Unilateral Extraterritorial Sanctions: Issues of Jurisdictional Justification in International Law

Keywords: extraterritorial sanctions, unilateral restrictive measures, jurisdiction, sovereign equality principle, secondary sanctions, territorial principle of jurisdiction, nationality principle, protective principle

Abstract

The contemporary international legal system is undergoing serious transformation related to expanding practice of coercive measures applied by individual states beyond of national territory. The author analyzes legal foundations and limitations of modern approaches to justifying state competence in the sphere of restrictive measures. The evolution of terminological system from classical concepts of «countermeasures» and «retorsions» by the International Law Commission to modern politically motivated terms «sanctions», «restrictive measures», and «autonomous sanctions» is studied. Based on analysis of restrictive measures practice by various states, main types of extraterritorial measures are identified by subject composition, nature of impact, scope of objectives, and mechanism of action. Traditional principles of jurisdiction are examined: territoriality, nationality, and protective principle. Legal aspects of their application to extraterritorial measures are explored in detail, including extensive interpretation of territorial principle through «correspondent jurisdiction» and «effects doctrine» concepts, application of nationality principle to controlled companies and exported goods, unjustified extension of protective principle to foreign policy interests. Special attention is paid to legal analysis of secondary sanctions as the most problematic form of extraterritorial coercion. Through practical cases (Helms-Burton Act, BNP Paribas case, sanctions against Russia and Iran), key legal problems are analyzed: non-compliance with requirements of significant jurisdictional nexus, violation of proportionality principle, conflict with sovereign equality principle. The influence of geographic asymmetry in extraterritorial measures application on impossibility of customary international law norm formation is demonstrated. Systemic deficiencies of the «anti-avoidance» concept are revealed. The fundamental conflict between sovereignty principle and effectiveness of restrictive measures under institutional crisis of collective security system is analyzed. Directions for international legal regulation development are proposed, including strengthening multilateral mechanisms, improving judicial procedures, and creating procedural guarantees against abuse of coercive measures.

Author Biography

Peter I. Chuvakhin, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)

Сandidate of Sciences (Law), Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University), 76 Vernadsky Avenue, Moscow, 119454, Russia, chuvakhin.petr@yandex.ru

References

Bennouna M. (2002) Les Sanctions économiques des Nations Unies. Courses of The Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 300, pp. 9–158.

Biersteker T.J., Eckert S.E., Tourinho M. (eds.) (2016) Targeted Sanctions: The Impact and Effectiveness of United Nations Action. Cambridge: University Press, 405 p.

Bismuth R. (2016) Pour une appréhension nuancée de l’extraterritorialité du droit américain. Annuaire français de droit international, vol. LXI, pp. 785–807.

Bogdanova I. (2022) The Legality of Unilateral Economic Sanctions under Public International Law. In: van den Herik L. ed. Unilateral Sanctions in International Law and the Enforcement of Human Rights. Leiden: Brill, pp. 59–158.

Boklan D.S., Koval V.V. (2024) Unilateral sanctions under international law and blocking effectiveness. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava=Moscow Journal of International Law, no. 1, pp. 6–23 (in Russ.)

Bowman G.W. (2014) A Prescription for Curing U.S. Export Controls. Marquette Law Review, vol. 97, pp. 600–693.

Crawford J. (2013) State Responsibility: The General Part. Cambridge: University Press, 808 p.

Crawford J. (2019) Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law. 9th ed. Oxford: University Press, 1084 p.

Damas A.P. (2023) The Legality of Third-Party Countermeasures in Response to Violations of Obligations erga omnes: The Case Studies of Myanmar and Russia. LL.M Thesis. University of Amsterdam.

Early B.R., Schulzke M. (2019) Still Unjust, Just in Different Ways: How Targeted Sanctions Fall Short of Just War Theory’s Principles. International Studies Review, vol. 21, pp. 57–80.

Heller K.J. (2018) Specially-Affected States and the Formation of Custom. American Journal of International Law, vol. 112, pp. 191–243.

Hofer A. (2020) Creating and contesting hierarchy: the punitive effect of sanctions in a horizontal system. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, no. 125, pp. 15–37.

Jaeger M. (2021) Circumventing Sovereignty: Extraterritorial Sanctions Leveraging the Technologies of the Financial System. Swiss Political Science Review, vol. 27, pp. 180–192.

Nagel A.S. (2023) Unilateral Extraterritorial Sanctions: The Search for a Jurisdictional Justification under International Law. LSE Law Review, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 368–395.

Nollkaemper A. (2012) International Adjudication of Public Goods: The Intersection of Substance and Procedure. European Journal of International Law, vol. 23, pp. 769–791.

Rathbone J.P., Jeydel P., Lentz A. (2013) Sanctions, Sanctions Everywhere. Georgetown Journal of International Law, vol. 44, pp. 1055–1178.

Ruys T., Ryngaert C. (2020) Secondary Sanctions: A Weapon out of Control? The International Legality of, and European Responses to, US Secondary Sanctions. British Yearbook of International Law, pp. 1–116.

Shaw M.N. (2021) International Law. Cambridge: University Press, 1308 p.

Simma B., Müller T. (2012) Exercise and limits of jurisdiction. In: Crawford J., Koskenniemi M. (eds.) Cambridge Companion to International Law. Cambridge: University Press, pp. 134–157.

Sokolshchik L.M., Sokolshchik Y.S., Teremetskiy K.S. (2024) US Sanctions Policy towards Latin America: Cases of Official Narratives on Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. Vestnik VolGU. Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya=Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations, no. 1, pp. 214–224.

Subedi S.P. (2019) The Status of Unilateral Sanctions in International Law. In: Economic Sanctions under International Law. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 1–24.

Thouvenin J.-M. (2021) Articulating UN sanctions with unilateral restrictive measures. In: Beaucillon C. ed. Research Handbook on Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 149164.

Timofeev I.N. (2022) Sanctions on Russia: A New Chapter. Russia in Global Affairs, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 103–119.

White N.D. (2017) Autonomous and Collective Sanctions in the International Legal Order. The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online, no. 1, pp. 3–16.

Published
2026-06-16
How to Cite
ChuvakhinP. I. (2026). Unilateral Extraterritorial Sanctions: Issues of Jurisdictional Justification in International Law. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 19(2), 246-272. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2026.2.246.272
Section
Law in the Modern World