The Influence of Fundamental Human Rights upon Implementation of European Union Internal Market Freedoms

  • Elena V. Postnikova National Research University Higher School of Economics
Keywords: internal market, European Union, peremptory requirements of common interest, EU general principles of law, human rights, EU law, non-discrimination principle, freedom of movement of goods, EU Court, economic freedoms of EU internal market

Abstract

A single internal market is one of the main achievements of the European Union in the epoch of globalization. The EU includes not only a single market of goods and services but shares the values fixed in the EU founding treaties including The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. In particular, respecting fundamental rights is part of the common EU principles of law. The aim of the paper is to specify the balance of the principle of protecting human rights and economic freedoms of the EU internal market. The author identifies two aspects of the balance. The first aspect is that observing human rights promotes to the increase of effective functioning of the internal market. The second aspect is the aim of protecting human rights may be a ground to limit economic freedoms on the internal market. The research is based on the provisions of the following international law acts: European Union Treaty, Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union, EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, European Convention on Human Rights, European social charter, and the case practice of the EU Court. The first aspect overviews the principle of the prohibition of discrimination, protection of consumer rights, right to protecting private information, freedom of professional activity and right to labour. The second aspect deals with the EU law which provides for the possibility to limit the freedom of the internal market by member states to achieve some goals. In particular, the protection of human rights is one of the grounds for limiting economic freedoms of the EU internal market. The paper stresses the decision of the EU Court on C-112/00 Schmidberger (2003) on the freedom of movement of goods. The case showed that the primate of freedom of opinions and gatherings is a justification for limiting the freedom of movement of goods. Overall, it is impossible to state if the Court consider either human rights or economic freedoms of internal market more. National courts are given disposal in trying a case to seek a fairer balance between economic freedoms and human rights.

Author Biography

Elena V. Postnikova, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Associate Professor, International Public and Private Law, Law Faculty, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Candidate of Juridical Sciences. Address: 20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation. E-mail: epostnikova@hse.ru

References

Chetverikov A.O. (2010) Normativnaya model' liberalizatsii transgranichnykh otnosheniy v prave Evropeyskogo Soyuza: pravovye formy i obshchie printsipy sozdaniya prostranstva bez vnutrennikh granits v ramkakh ES [Normative model of Liberalizing Transborder Relations in EU Law: Legal Forms and Common Principles to Shape the Space without Internal Borders within the EU]. Moscow: Elit, 232 p. (in Russian)

Chalmers D. et al. (2014) European Union Law. Text and Materials. Cambridge, 1220 p.

Craig P., de Búrca G. (2015) EU Law, Text, Cases and Materials. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1198 p.

Dony M. (2008) Droit de l'Union européenne. Troisième édition revue et augmentée. Bruxelles : Editions de l'Université, 762 p.

Douglas-Scott S. (2006) A Tale of two Courts: Luxembourg, Strasbourg and the Growing European Human Rights Acquis. Common Market Law Review, vol. 34, pp. 629-665.

Douglas-Scott S. (2011) The European Union and Human Rights after the Treaty of Lisbon. Human Rights Law Review, vol. 11, issue 4, pp. 645-682.

Ispolinov A.S. (2012) Poisk balansa mezhdu svobodami vnutrennego rynka i pravami cheloveka v sudebnoy praktike ES [In Search of Balance between the Freedoms of Internal Market and Human Rights in EU Judicial Practice]. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya, no 6, pp. 38-49.

Kashkin S.Yu. (ed.) (2001) Khartiya Evropeyskogo Soyuza ob osnovnykh pravakh: kommentarii [European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights: Commentaries]. Moscow: Yurisprudentsiya, 208 p. (in Russian)

Meshcheryakova O.M. (2013) Khartiya Evropeyskogo Soyuza ob osnovnykh pravakh i problema rasshireniya kompetentsii institutov ES [EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Issue of Broadening the Competence in EU Institutions]. Pravovaya initsiativa, no 6. Available at: http://www.49e.ru (accessed: 17.04.2016)

Meshcheryakova O.M. (2014) Osnovnye printsipy zashchity prav cheloveka v prave Evropeyskogo Soyuza [The Main Principles of Protecting Human Rights in EU Law]. Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, no 4, pp. 139-142.

Myuller-Graff P.-K. (2008) Lissabonskiy dogovor v sisteme pervichnogo prava Evropeyskogo Soyuza [Lisbon Treaty in the System of Primary Law of the European Union]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, no 1, pp. 80-99.

Postnikova E.V. (2013) Scope of Freedom to Provide Services: Prohibited Restrictions. Higher School of Economics. Working Paper. Series “Law”, no 19, 20 p.

Skouris V. (2006) Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: The Challenge of Striking a Delicate Balance. European Business Law Review, no 17, pp. 225-239.

Westermark H. (2008) The Balance between Fundamental Freedoms and Fundamental Rights in the European Community. MA thesis. Lund. Available at: https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=1562978&fileOId=1566135 (accessed: 25.09.2016)

Yumashev Yu.M., Postnikova E.V. (2015) Ekonomicheskoe pravo Evropeyskogo Soyuza [European Union Economic Law]. Moscow: Norma, 384 p. (in Russian)

Published
2016-02-25
How to Cite
PostnikovaE. V. (2016). The Influence of Fundamental Human Rights upon Implementation of European Union Internal Market Freedoms. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (4), 167-183. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2016.4.167.183
Section
Law in the Modern World