Definitions of Concepts in the Acts of the Russian Legislation — Pro et Contra

Keywords: legal terminology, definition, regulation, rules of the definition, law-enforcement, application of legal norms

Abstract

The article presented review the practice of using definitions of concepts in the texts of legal acts. The author analysis of the popular, but unreasonable practice when are drawn up the lists definitions and included in the acts of Russian legislation as special — often very voluminous — inclusions fully dedicated to the definitions used in one legal act (federal law or other regulatory legal act). These inclusions most often time represent a separate article, and lists of concepts can be supplied with explanations that the proposed concepts are defined for the purposes of this act only (but not all acts which regulate a similar subject), or that the lexical meaning proposed in this article of the law concepts should be considered unless otherwise specified in the text of the act. Meanwhile, the absolute requirement for the formation of legislative regulation in the domestic practice of law-making is that concepts introduced into legislation should serve its entire array, regardless of the branch or thematic affiliation of an act. If the definitions refer to one single act only, then the legislation gets archaic attributes. The author notes that in almost all cases the definitions are very unfortunate: concepts are not logically complete; there are no indications of those of the signs of the concept being defined that are of significant importance; definitions are characterized by the coincidence of the word being defined and the defining one. The analysis of the federal acts leads to the conclusion that the definitions have a purpose other than the purpose of normative regulation: it is do not formulate rules of behavior, do not create models of legitimate activities. The author questions the correctness of the construction of the regulatory framework with an arbitrary interpretation of the words features. The inclusion of elements of interpretation in the texts of federal laws is blurring the difference between academic knowledge and practical activities in matters of legislation. If the practice of including arbitrary definitions in the texts of federal laws continues, this will have a negative impact on the law-enforcement situation.

Author Biography

Evgeniya Yurtaeva, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

Сandidate of Sciences (Law), Assistant Professor

References

Alekseev S.S. (1981) General theory of law. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 360 p. (in Russ.)

Alekseev S.S. (1994) Theory of law. Moscow: BEK, 224 p. (in Russ.)

Apt L.F., Vetrov A.G. (2018) The conceptual framework of information legislation. Pravovaia informatika=Legal Informatics, no. 2, pp. 65–73 (in Russ.)

Avrutin Yu.E. (2013) Concepts and definitions in administrative law doctrine and practice. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess=Administrative Law and Process, no. 9, pp. 4–8 (in Russ.)

Blinova O.V., Belov S.A. (2020). Linguistic ambiguity and uncertainty in Russian legal texts. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo=Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Law, no. 4, pp. 774–812 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.401

Braude I.L. (2010) Essays on legislative technology. Issues of the Soviet law system. Moscow: Norma, 159 p. (in Russ.)

Chinnova M.V. (2004) Definitions and their use in legal acts: Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Moscow, 24 p. (in Russ.)

Fomin V.Yu. (2023) Unification of terminology as a direction of legislative improvement of interim measures. Juridicheskaya tekhnika=Legal Technology, no. 17, pp. 388–391 (in Russ.)

Gurskiy R.A. (2015) Legal definition of land in context of land and property relations. Vestnik Samarskoi gumanitarnoi akademii=Bulletin of Samara Humanitarian Academy, no. 1–2, pp. 24-29 (in Russ.)

Halfina R.O. (1988) Law as a means of social management. Moscow: Nauka, 256 p. (in Russ.)

Höfler S., Nussbaumer M., Xanthaki H. (2017) Legislative drafting. In: U. Karpen, H. Xanthaki (eds.) Legislation of Europe. London: Bloomsbury, 320 p.

Isakov V.B. (2007) Receptions of legal technology at initial stages of legislative process. Juridicheskaya technika=Legal Technology, no. 1, pp. 172–178 (in Russ.)

Isakov V.B. (2000) Stages of drafting. In: The Legislative Technology. Moscow: Gorodets, pp. 59–77 (in Russ.)

Kalachov N.V. (1859) Review of legal dictionary. In: Archive of historical and practical information relating to Russia. Saint Petersburg: University, pp. 40–56 (in Russ.)

Khairetdinova M.D. (2008) The legal definition: theory and practice. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Nizhnii Novgorod, 189 p. (In Russian)

Krasnov M. (2003) Legislative definitions are not always useful. Rossiiskaia iustitsiia=Russian Justice, no. 2, pp. 51–52 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023975210459

Kroz V.M., Kolesova O.N. (2015) Earth and land as an object of relationship. Voprosy ekonomiki i prava=Issues of Economy and Law, no. 1, pp. 31–36 (in Russ.)

Kruss V.I. (2007) Constitutional topology and definitive transgression of legal meanings: theory and practice. Legislative definition: logical-epistemological, political-legal, moral-psychological and practical aspects: papers of international round table. Nizhnii Novgorod: Juridicheskaya tekhnika, pp. 199–223 (in Russ.)

Lomonosov M.V. (1957) New location and establishment of the Saint Petersburg Imperial Academy of Sciences. In: Complete works. Vol. 10. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR, pp. 138–160 (in Russ.)

Luneva E.V. (2019) Synonyms in legal texts, their semantic load and significance in law enforcement. Juridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka=Legal Education and Science, no. 4, pp. 39–44 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1190-2019-4-39-44

Moskalenko I.V. (2003) Civil legal definitions (methodological aspect): Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Moscow, 25 p. (in Russ.)

Moskalkova T.N., Chernikov V.V. (2022) Lawmaking: a manual. Moscow: Prospect, 448 p. (in Russ.)

Pigolkin A.S. (1981) Legislative technique and legal creation. Theory foundations of Soviet lawmaking. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 254–315 (in Russ.)

Pigolkin A.S. (1990) Formalization of bills (lawmaking technique). How to prepare laws: a manual. Moscow: Izvestia, pp. 31–59 (in Russ.)

Puryaeva A.S. (2011) Forming concept of forest in the Russian Federation legislation. Rossijskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal=Russian Law Journal, no. 5, pp. 179–185 (in Russ.)

Sinaiskii V.I. (1911) Do we need to hurry with the publication of the Civil Code and can we create it now? Warsaw: University, 29 p. (in Russ.)

Thornton G.C. (1996) Legislative drafting. 4th ed. London: Bloomsbury, 447 p.

Tikhomirov Yu.A. (1982) Theory of law. Moscow: Nauka, 257 p. (in Russ.)

Turanin V.Ju. (2006) Essence and meaning of definition in the modern legal text. Sovremennoe pravo=Modern Law, no. 5, pp. 43–48 (in Russ.)

Ushakova L.N. (2009) Definition as an atypical means of legislative techniques: Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Saint Petersburg, 196 p. (in Russ.)

Zatonskiy V.A., Mal’ko A.V. (2006) Legal life and legal system: correlation of concepts. Pravovaia politika i pravovaia zhizn’=Law Politics and Life, no. 2, pp. 6–20 (in Russ.)

Published
2024-09-04
How to Cite
YurtaevaE. (2024). Definitions of Concepts in the Acts of the Russian Legislation — Pro et Contra. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 17(3), 4-31. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2024.3.4.31
Section
Legal thought: history and contemporarity