Realizing Constitutional Citizens Right for Participation in Economic Justice
Abstract
The paper studies constitutional grounds for the involvement of citizens in state affairs and administering justice considered as the fundamental principles of relations between a democratic state and its citizens, with an emphasis that court cannot be separated from society as courts will not become efficient bodies of social control without response from society. The author develops the idea that the institutes involving citizens to administering justice are an efficient tool to fight corruption in judicial system, to promote a truly independent justice and may influence the formation of civil society, the development of civil responsibility and civil consciousness. The paper scrutinizes the objects and objectives of applying this institute, identifies their differences and features in terms of various types of justice. The instances of involving citizens in administering justice are presented on the examples of arbitrazh jurors in economic trials. The case practice is based on arbitrazh courts. The paper considers the changes in the arbitrazh procedural legislation and the resulting changes in administering justice which lead to adverse consequences represented in curtailing this institute and thus impossibility to compose the group of judges and jurors of people with economic background. The paper revealed the causes of this tendency on the basis of statistics, arbitrazh practice and sociological research. In particular, the author examines the process of composing the group of arbitrazh jurors in court to identify positive and negative processes and their causes, influence of Russian business community. The paper analyzes the corps of a particular arbitrazh court considering an economic dispute. Besides, general issues and their causes are studied in the paper.
References
Dobrovol'skiy V.I. (2009) Aktual'nye voprosy arbitrazhnogo protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva: o chem molchit Arbitrazhnyy protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Topical issues of Arbitrazh Legislation: What Arbitrazh Procedure Code Conceals]. Moscow, SPS Konsul'tantPlyus
Foynitskiy I.Ya. (1996) Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Course on Criminal Process]. Saint-Petersburg: AL'FA, 552 p. (in Russian)
Khodykin M. Arbitrazhnye zasedateli: priznak zrelosti obshchestva ili chuzherodnyy element v rossiyskom arbitrazhnom protsesse? [Arbitrazh Jurors: Sign of Mature Society or an Alien Feature of Russian Arbitrazh] SPS Konsul'tantPlyus
Kleandrov M.I. (2000) Status arbitrazhnykh, narodnykh, prisyazhnykh zasedateley [Status of Arbitrazh, People's and Court Jurors]. Moscow: APU IGiP RAN, 106 p. (in Russian)
Kleandrov M.I. (2006) Ekonomicheskoe pravosudie v Rossii: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee monografiya [Economic Justice in Russia: Past, Present, Future. Monograph]. Moscow: Wolters Kluver, 600 p. (in Russian)
Kozhukharova N.I. Osobennosti rassmotreniya del s uchastiem arbitrazhnykh zasedateley RF [Cases Involving Arbitrazh jurors in RF] SPS Konsul'tantPlyus
Krasnokutskiy V.A. (1915) Russkiy torgovyy protsess [Russian Trade Process]. M.K. Treushnikov (ed.) (2005) Grazhdanskiy protsess. Khrestomatiya: Uchebnoe posobie [Civil Process. Texts. Manual]. Moscow: OAO «ID «Gorodets», 986 p. (in Russian)
Lebedev V.M., Khabrieva T.Ya (eds) (2012) Pravosudie v sovremennom mire: monografiya [Justice in Modern World]. Moscow: Norma, 704 p. (in Russian)
Lyadnova E.V. Deyatel'nost' arbitrazhnykh zasedateley kak sposob obespecheniya publichnosti arbitrazhnogo sudoproizvodstva [Arbitrazh Jurors as a Means of Ensuring Publicity of Arbitrazh]. SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Mazan'ko N.A. Institut arbitrazhnykh zasedateley i poslednie izmeneniya v APK RF [Arbitrazh Jurors and the Latest Changes in the RF Arbitration Procedure Court]. SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Narutto S.V., Smirnov V.A. (2008) Prisyazhnye i arbitrazhnye zasedateli: teoriya i praktika: monografiya [Jurors and Arbitrazh Jurors: Theory and Practice. Monograph]. Moscow: Prospekt, 208 p. (in Russian)
Petrukhin I.L. (ed.) (2003) Sudebnaya vlast': kollektivnaya monografiya [Judiciary. Collective Monograph]. Moscow: Velbi, 703 p.
Rashchevskiy E. (2005) Privlechenie arbitrazhnykh zasedateley kak bezuslovnoe pravo storony v protsesse [Attracting Arbitrazh Jurors as an Absolute Right of a Party in a Process]. Korporativnyy yurist, no 4, SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Smola A.A. Arbitrazhnye zasedateli: veter peremen [Arbitrazh Jurors: Wind of Changes]. Gazeta EZh-Yurist, SPS Konsul'tant Plyus (in Russian)
Vas'kovskiy E.V. (2003) Uchebnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Textbook on Civil Process]. Moscow: Zertsalo, 530 p.
Voskobitova L.A. (2003) Sushchnostnye kharakteristiki sudebnoy vlasti. Monografiya [Features of Judiciary]. Stavropol': Stavropol'servisshkola, 160 p. (in Russian)
Copyright (c) 2015 Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.













