The Concept and Features of Careless Infliction

  • Irina Yu. Yanina Mordovian State University
Keywords: careless infliction, complicity, careless complicity, participation, infliction, compatibility

Abstract

The article discusses the problem of careless criminal activities carried out by several people, from the position of a special kind of criminal law infliction. The article determines the legal nature of multipersonal careless crimes. The analysis of existing scientific categories of negligent infliction may help to form an idea about its features. The author proposes to change the name of reckless criminal activity of two or more persons — instead of the traditional concept of careless co-infliction you can use the name of the negligent infliction. The terms infliction, participation and consistency are relevant only to intentional crimes committed in complicity. It marked contiguous nature of the crimes carried out by negligence, the infliction, and crimes committed in complicity. The study of the concept of negligent infliction showed that in theory the authors of this form of criminal behavior in general understood it in the same way. Author disagrees with the position of forensic scientists who consider reckless and deliberate forms of criminal activity as a number of subjects that are identical to penal phenomenon. He has formulated definition (doctrinal and legislative) of negligent infliction. Also author gives an exhaustive list of characteristics of reckless criminal activity of two or more persons, — careless form of guilt; interconnected and interdependent nature of the offense committed by the causer; careless criminal result, was the result of careless or negligent acts of a few individuals. Particular lexical interpretation is given to two signs of negligent infliction, such as the interrelatedness and interdependence. Present-day academic point of view of the need to secure the careless infliction at the legislative level is confirmed. The study demonstrates that often when making careless actions convicted by a few persons, criminal liability comes only to one of these entities. In order to be able to prosecute all the participants of careless infliction it should be consolidated in the text of the Criminal Code. The place of imprudence in the structure of the General Part of the Criminal Law — Chapter 71 of the Criminal Code, «Special forms of inflicting» in Art. 363 «Negligent infliction».

Author Biography

Irina Yu. Yanina, Mordovian State University

Postgraduate Student, Department of Criminal Law, Criminalistics and Criminology, Mordovian State University. Address: 20 Polezhaeva Str., Saransk, 430005, Russian Federation. E-mail: yanina_i@bk.ru

References

Babiy N. A. (2013) Mnozhestvennost' lits v prestupleniiiproblemyucheniya o souchasti [The Multiplicity of Persons in a Crime and Problems of the Complicity Doctrine]. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 720 p. (in Russian)

Danelyan R.S. (2012) Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy, sovershennykh v souchastii: uchebnoe posobie [Qualification of Crimes Committed in Complicity]. Moscow: MGPU, 108 p. (in Russian)

Gladkova A.D. (2014) Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' soprichiniteley vreda po neostorozhnosti [Criminal Liability of a Tort Feasor by Negligence]. Science Time, no 5, pp. 50-55.

Grinberg M.S. (1990) Souchastie v neostorozhnykh prestupleniyakh [Complicity in Crimes of Negligence]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo I pravo, no 8, pp. 53-60.

Kanashina O.A. (2012) Vzaimnaya vina v ugolovnom prave: neobhodimost' ustanovleniya [Mutual Guilt in Criminal Law: Need for Establishment]. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 280 p. (in Russian)

Kozaev N.Sh. (2013) Sovremennye proizvodstvennye tekhnologii I kontseptsiya neostorozhnogo so-prichineniya v ugolovnom prave [Modern Production Technology and Concept of a Careless Infliction in Criminal Law]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel, no 16, pp. 33-38.

Kozlov A.P. (2001) Souchastie: traditsii I real'nost' [Complicity: tradition and reality]. Saint Petersburg: Yuridisheskiy tsentr Press, 362 p. (in Russian)

Korableva S.Yu. (2013) Voprosy kvalifikatsii deyaniy neostorozhnykh soprichiniteley [Issues in Qualification of Careless Acts of Infliction]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel’, no 24, pp. 18-21.

Kursaev A.V. (2015) Neostorozhnoe soprichinenie v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: monografiya [Careless Infliction in Russian Criminal Law]. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 280 p. (in Russian)

Lopashenko N.A. (ed.). (2014) Voprosy Obshchey chaste ugolovnogo prava v teorii i pravoprimenitel’noy deyatel’nosti Respublike Mordoviya [Questions of the General Part of Criminal Law in Theory and Law Enforcement in Republic of Mordovia]. Saransk: Mordovsky universitet, 256 p. (in Russian)

Namnyasev V.V. (2014) Osobennosti ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti lits, upravlyayushchikh transportnymi sredstvami, pri oboyudnom narushenii pravil dorozhnogo dvizheniya [Criminal Liability of Persons Driving Vehicles by Mutual Violation of Traffic Rules]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya, no 20, pp. 111-113.

Naumov A.V. (2011) Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo: kurs lektsiy v 3 t. T. 1: Obshchay chast’ [Russian Criminal Law: Course of Lectures]. Moscow: Volters Kluver, 768 p. (in Russian)

Nersesyan V.A. (2006) Otvetstvennost’ za neostorozhnye prestupleniya: (Diss. dokt. yurid. nauk.) [Responsibility for Careless Crimes (Doctor of Juridical Sciences Dissertation)]. Moscow, 334 p.

Nikiforov B.S. (1959) Osnovy ugolovnogo zakonodatel’stva Soyuza SSR isoyuznykh respublik [Fundamentals of Criminal Legislation of the USSR and Union Republics]. Moscow: Gosyurizdat, 712 p. (in Russian)

Poznyshev S.V. (1912) Osnovnye nachala nauki ugolovnogo prava. [The Principles of Science of Criminal Law]. Moscow: Kartsev, 653 p. (in Russian)

Vladimirov L.E. (1889) Uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo prava [Textbook of Russian Criminal Law]. Kharkov, 253 p. (in Russian)

Published
2016-02-23
How to Cite
YaninaI. Y. (2016). The Concept and Features of Careless Infliction. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (2), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2016.2.65.73
Section
Russian Law: Condition, Perspectives, Commentaries