Procedural Requirements of Terminating Employees Contract by Employer without Employee’s Fault in Foreign Countries

  • Ekaterina S. Batusova National Research University Higher School of Economics
Keywords: employment contract, termination of employment contract, employee, employer, guarantees

Abstract

Globalization in the economy affects the legal regulation, in particular the legal regulation of labour as one of the main business costs are the costs associated with employees, in particular wages, salary, other payments. Besides, investors are attracted by the ability to respond quickly to the changing situation in the economy. It depends in particular on the possibility to dismiss those employees abundant for enterprise development. At the current stage of world economic development, lawmakers have faced the challenge to maintain the attractiveness of local labour law for employers and at the same time strengthen the protection of labour rights, in particular termination the employment contract without employee's fault. Foreign lawmakers solve this issue in different ways. The purpose of the legal regulation is balancing the interests of employer and employee. The means of ensuring that balance differ. In particular, it depends on the specific legal regulations in each country. The criteria for the comparison were as follows: the form of preventing the termination of the employment contract; criteria for determining the notice period; the presence or absence of state authority notice of the employees; the need for coordination dismissal of employees with the state body. The main provisions of the procedural requirements for individual dismissals in Austria, France, Germany, Spain, Canada, Romania, France, Switzerland were analyzed. The legal regulation of the termination of the employment contract by the employer without the employee's fault in foreign countries is characterized by the following common features: the right of an employer to dismiss an employee on the grounds stipulated by the legislation in compliance with a specific procedural requirements; the lack of a disciplinary offense as a reason to disciplinary action, under which an employer may take such kind of disciplinary action as dismissal; the presence of notice to the employee to be dismissed. The analysis of legal regulation of terminating the employment contract allows selecting three models: the country with prevailing regulatory flexibility over rigidity; countries with dominating regulatory rigidity over flexibility; the country with a mixed approach.

Author Biography

Ekaterina S. Batusova, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Senior Lecturer, Department of Labor Law and Law of Social Security, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Candidate of Juridical Sciences. Address: 20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation. E-mail: ebatusova@hse.ru, batusovs@gmail.com

References

Blanpain R. (2001) Labour Law, Human Rights and Social Justice: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Prof. Dr. Ruth Ben Israel. Kluwer Law International. 300 p.

Creighton B., Stewart A. (2005) Labour Law. Sydney: The Federation Press, 684 p.

Feichtinger J., Klinger B. (2007) Austria. Getting the Deal Through — Labour & Employment. London: CerhaHempelSpiegelfeldHlawati, 34 p.

Hardy S. (2011) Labour Law in Great Britain. Wolters Kluwer, 340 p.

Khabrieva T.Ya. (2014) Osnovnye vektory i problemy razvitiya sotsial'nogo zakonodatel'stva [Vectors and Issues of development of Social Legislation]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no 8, pp. 5-15.

Kiselev I.Ya. (2005) Trudovoe pravo Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran. Mezhdunarodnye normy truda [Labour Law in Russia and Abroad. International Labour Norms]. Moscow: Eksmo, 608 p. (in Russian)

Kiselev I.Ya. (1997) Trudovoy dogovor: voprosy regulirovaniya nayma i uvol'neniya [Labour Contract: Regulating Recruitment and Dismissal]. Moscow: Ministerstvo truda i sotsial'nogo razvitiya, 102 p. (in Russian)

Kurennoy A.M. (2015) Sotsial'noe gosudarstvo i sotsial'noe partnerstvo: kak soedinit' usiliya? [Social State and Social Partnership: Joining Forces]. Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom, no 4, pp. 3-7.

Lyutov N.L. (2016) Sotsial'nye i trudovye otnosheniya v usloviyakh ekonomicheskogo krizisa: soblyudenie balansa interesov [Social and Labour Relations in Economic Crisis: Balance of Interests]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no 1, pp. 30-38.

Lucassen K., Sluter S., Shul M., Wang M. (2014) Corporate Law. Employment Law in Switzerland. Journal of the International Institute for Law and Medicine, pp. 165-173.

Sklyarova D.V., Lipskaya E.I. (2013) Trudovoe zakonodatel'stvo Shveytsarii [Swiss Employment Law]. Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom, no 2, pp. 45-50.

Swiss Employment Law. CMS von Erlach Henrici. Zurich: CMS, 2012, 24 p.

Vasil'eva V.I. (2006) Osobennosti prekrashcheniya trudovogo dogovora po zakonodatel'stvu Avstrii i Frantsii [Terminating Employment Contract in Austria and France]. Yurist, no 3, pp. 39-42.

Waas B. Employee Representation at the Enterprise in Germany. Available at: http://www.jil.go.jp/eng-lish/reports/documents/jilpt-reports/no.11_germany.pdf (accessed 24 June 2016).

Wendler M., Tremml B., Buecker B.J. (2013) Key Aspects of German Business Law: A Practical Manual. Springer Science & Business Media, 334 p.

Published
2016-02-24
How to Cite
BatusovaE. S. (2016). Procedural Requirements of Terminating Employees Contract by Employer without Employee’s Fault in Foreign Countries. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (3), 159-171. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2016.3.159.171
Section
Law in the Modern World