Instruments of Public Domain in Modern Information Society
Abstract
Broadening the list of the protected results of intellectual property should not cause the deprivation of the possibility to have an access to a scientific and cultural domain and use it in society. Acquisition by using intellectual property of global nature means the necessity to obtain permission to use the result of intellectual activity in some jurisdictions and probably from different copyright holders. This raises the price of using intellectual property and hence the price of access of society to the existing achievements of the human mind in both cultural and technological areas. To solve these issues, the mechanism of public domain can play a significant role. It is deserves noting that a simple withdrawal of objects from copyright protection may cause new challenges: weaker exclusive rights can cause not only broadening the sphere of free use of works by society but monopolization of the emerging sphere by people supervising databases. The public domain regime allows averting this challenge setting rules and conditions of using third party's results of intellectual activity. At that, this regime may be lucrative to both users and copyright holders which in turn use borrowed results of intellectual activity in the commercial activity including the creation of new objects. The paper features the fundamental functions of public domain. These functions are various and they go beyond the limits of the internal regulation of intellectual property. However, the regime of public domain lacks efficiency in terms of stimulating initiative in innovations and creating new results as the mechanism of exclusive rights works better. Thus, complex regulation of issues of intellectual property taking into account the potential of every available instrument may become the most efficient. In this case, the regime of public domain may be a crucial tool for regulating intellectual property and using information in general.
References
Dozortsev V.A. (2005) Kommentariy k sheme «Sistema isklyuchitel'nykh prav» [Commentary to the Table: System of Exclusive Rights]. Dozortsev V.A. Intellektual'nye prava [Intellectual Rights]. Moscow: Statut, pp. 32-51 (in Russian).
Kalyatin V.O., Voynikanis E.A. (2007) Soderzhanie bazy dannykh kak novyy ob”ekt pravovogo regulirovaniya [Database Content as a New Object of Legal Regulation]. Zakonodatel'stvo, no 2, pp. 28-38 (in Russian).
Aplin T. (2010) A Global Digital Register for the Preservation and Access to Cultural Heritage: Problems, Challenges and Possibilities. Copyright and Cultural Heritage. Preservation and Access to Works in a Digital World. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, p. 3-27.
Boyle J. (2010) The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. Greenwich: Yale University Press, 336 p.
Colin C. (2010) Registers, Databases and Orphan Works / Copyright and Cultural Heritage. Preservation and Access to Works in a Digital World. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, p. 28-50.
Cornish W., Llewelyn D., Aplin T. (2010) Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trademarks and Allied Rights. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 974 p.
Davies W., Withers K. (2006) Public Innovation. Intellectual Property in a Digital Age. Montreal: Institute for Research in Public Policy, 104 p. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/30_10_06_public.pdf (accessed: November 29, 2015).
Gilchrist J. (2005) Copyright Deposit, Legal Deposit or Library Deposit? The Government's Role as Preserver of Copyright Material. Queensland University Technical Law and Justice Journal, no 5, p. 177-194.
Hugenholtz P.B. (1999) Code as Code. Or the End of Intellectual Property as We Know It. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, no 6 (3), p. 308-318.
Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy. London, 2002. Available at: http://www.iprcommission.org/papers/pdfs/final_report/CIPRfullfinal.pdf (accessed: November 25, 2015).
Koelman K.J. (2000) A Hard Nut to Crack: The Protection of Technological Measures. European Intellectual Property Review, no 6, p. 272-288.
MacQueen H., Waelde C., Laurie G., Brown A. (2008) Contemporary Intellectual Property: Law and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1058 p.
Netanel N.W. (2008) Copyright's Paradox. New York: Oxford University Press, 254 p.
Open Access and the Public Domain in Digital Data and Information for Science. Proceedings of an International Symposium. Washington: The National Academies Press, 2004, 196 p.
Phillips J. (1996-8) The Diminishing Domain. European Intellectual Property Review, p. 429.
Samuelson P. (2003) Digital Information. Digital Networks and the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems, no 66, pp. 80-107.
Copyright (c) 2015 Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.













