The Genesis of Private International Law in the Ancient World
Abstract
The problems of private international law genesis do not receive some special attention in the Russian doctrine. This situation is regrettable, since a study of history is the basis of the society’s legal culture. The article is aimed at partially filling this gap. It is devoted to the origin of conflicts of different national laws in Ancient Israel and Judea, Ancient Greece, Ancient Egypt. The main attention is paid to the nature of such collisions and the formation of ways to solve them. Attention is drawn to the difference in the nature of conflicts of laws in Israel and Egypt (interpersonal), on the one hand, and in Greece (interpolis), on the other. By writing the study, the author used the methods of comparative analysis and reconstruction, formal-logical, dialectical, natural science and historical methods. The states of the Ancient World were mostly theocratic despotisms characterized by xenophobia and a policy of militant isolationism. However, the objective needs of the economy dictate the need for international trade and recognition of the rights of foreigners. The attitude towards foreigners evolves from their complete lack of rights to the provision of national treatment to them, and this takes place in all states. In local courts, foreign personal law is recognized and applied, which makes it possible to assert the formation the connecting factor “lex personalis”. For foreigners, special courts are created, which in the process take into account the language of the contract, the origin of the parties and the place of conclusion of the contract. The main source of rules for choice of law is jurisprudence in all states; interpolis agreements play an important role in ancient Greece; the necessary regulation is derived through the interpretation of the Torah in Ancient Israel; conflict norms are fixed in the royal edict in Hellenistic Egypt. In conclusion, it is concluded that the PIL of the Ancient World is a collection of individual cases, this is “episodic private international law”. The limited amount of data does not allow drawing general theoretical conclusions, building a general line of evolution of the rules for applicable law. However, it is precisely the ancient and biblical approaches will subsequently become the intellectual foundation for the creation of scientific doctrines of PIL and its legislative regulation.
References
Ancel B. (2008) Histoire du droit international privé. Paris: Université Panthéon-Assas (Paris II), 196 p.
Bakhin S.V. (2022) At the sources of studies in international private law in Russia. Zhurnalrossiyskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, no 4, pp. 56-66 (in Russ.)
Berthelot K., Dohrmann N., Nemo-Pekelman C. (eds.) (2021) Legal engagement. The reception of Roman law and tribunals by Jews and other inhabitants of the Empire. Rome: École française, 535 p.
Bibikov P.S. (1852) An outline of international law in Greece. Moscow: Gauthier, 121 p. (in Russ.)
Brun M.I. (1911) International private law: course of lectures delivered at the Moscow Commercial Institute in 1910/1911. Moscow: L.M. Prokhorov and N.A. Yashkin Printing House, 313 p. (in Russ.)
Caré N. La conception du pluralisme juridique pendant l'antiquité grecque. Available at: URL: https://all-andorra.com/fr/la-conception-du-pluralisme-juridique-pendant-lantiquite-grecque/ (accessed: 25.06.2023)
Castro L. (2000) Derecho internacional privado. Parte general. Mexico: University Press, 780 p.
Dozhdev D.V. (2023) The Roman private law. Textbook. Moscow: Norma, 784 p. (in Russ.)
Grafskiy V.G. (2007) A general history of law and state. Textbook. Moscow: Norma, 738 p. (in Russ.)
Gutzwiller M. (1977) Geschichte des International Privatrechts. Basel-Stuttgart: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 326 S.
Hamza G. (2008) ¿Existió el Derecho Internacional Privado en el Imperio Romano? Revista Internacional de Derecho Romano, Octubre, pp. 78-90.
Hamza G. (1992) Some reflections on the history of private international law. Acta Juridica Hungarica, vol. 34, pp. 195-200.
Juenger F. (1993) Choice of law and multistate justice. Dordrecht — Boston — London: Martinus Nijhoff, 265 p.
Kovler A.I. (2002) Anthropology of law. Textbook. Moscow: Norma, 480 p. (in Russ.)
Kuhn A. (1937) Comparative commentaries on private international law, or conflict of laws. New York: Macmillan, 381 p.
Levi-Stross K. (1985) Structure of anthropology. Moscow: Nauka, 536 p. (in Russ.)
Lipstein K. (1981) Principles of the conflict of laws, national and international. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 144 p.
Lifshitz B. (1982) The rules concerning conflict of laws between a Jew and a Gentile according to Maimonides. In: Mélanges a la Mémoire de Marcel-Henri Prévost. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, pp. 179-189.
Mádl F. (2003) Milestones on the road of private international law developments. Delivered at the Celebration of the 110th Anniversary of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, 31 October 2003. The Hague, pp. 1-4.
Mandel'shtam A.N. (1900) The Hague conventions on codification of international private law. Saint Petersburg: Benke, 279 p. (in Russ.)
Merezhko A.A. (2006) Science of international private law: history and modernity. Kiev: Takson, 356 p. (in Russ.)
Meron Y. (1989) The choice of law in tort in Israel. Anglo-American Law Review, vol. 18, pp. 37-74.
Mills A. (2006) The private history of international law. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 1-49.
Nefedov B.I. (2016) The emergence of international private law. Part one. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava=Moscow Journal of International Law, no 1, pp. 3-18 (in Russ.)
Perogovskiy V. (1859) On the emergence of international law norms about aliens in the ancient world. Kiev: University, 51 p. (in Russ.)
Schwind F. (1959) Geistige und historische Grundlagen des internationalen Privatrechtes. Wien: Wien Rohrer, 113 S.
Sorokin P.A. (1992) Human being. Civilization. Society. Moscow: Politizdat, 543 p. (in Russ.)
Starodubtsev G.S. (2000) The Russian emigration scholar researches in international law in the period of 1918-1939. Moscow: Kniga i biznes, 294 p. (in Russ.)
Tolstykh V.L. (2004) International private law: regulating collisions. Saint Petersburg: Yuridical Tsentr Press, 526 p. (in Russ.)
Tsimmerman M. (1924) A history of international law since ancient times to 1918. Praha: Russian Faculty, 382 p. (in Russ.)
Vrellis S. (2009) Historical evolution of private international law in Greece. Dordrecht: Wolters Kluwer, pp. 19-23.
Wolff H. (1979) Das Problem der Konkurrenz von Rechtsordnungen in der Antike. Heidelberg: Winter, 78 S.
Yntema H. (1966) The comity doctrine. Michigan Law Review, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 9-32.
Yntema H. (1953) The historic bases of private international law. American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 2, pp. 297-317.
Copyright (c) 2023 Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.