Big Data and Legislation on Competition
Abstract
Global accessibility to the Internet and the exponential growth of compute capacity have caused the spread of business models collecting and generating big data. Reliable intellectual analysis of data and computer-assisted teaching allows companies to offer tailor-made special solutions. The current algorithms of self-education enable to find accurate information online within seconds. However, the advantages may be neutralized by serious disadvantages. The recent high-profile M&A transactions in digital Internet markets raised the question on the potential influence on the competition merger and acquiring control over big data. Indeed, companies can involve advanced computer technologies to coordinate business practices, impose abusive conditions for consumers, applying compelling market power to set higher prices or even possible closing the market for new market-players. Net effects based on the data tend to become stable promoting to the efficiency of the current market-players allowing them to strengthen their positions as soon as the critical mass of users is reached. Compensating the advantages of big data by potential costs for society depends on the ability of antimonopoly bodies and regulators respond to the new challenges of digital economy. It is possible to shape new more competitive adversary and dynamically developing markets with efficient and permanent innovations or a sharp growth of economic concentration leading to the abuse of market power and stagnation. The paper proposes the definition of big data and describes the main types of the influential factors and topology of market big data ecosystem. The paper reveals possible problems for competition due to big data and examines their potential influence on the efficiency of the current instruments of competition and the main activities of antimonopoly bodies, struggling against cartels, evaluation of abuse by domination and control of mergers.
References
Acquisti A., Taylor C., Wagman L. (2016) The Economics of Privacy. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 52, no 2. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580411 (accessed: 25.07.2016)
Balto D. and Lane M. (2016) Monopolizing Water in a Tsunami: Finding Sensible Antitrust Rules for Big Data. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2753249 (accessed: 4.10.2016)
Bauer M. (2016) Big Data: New Frontier for Competition Law. EU Competition Law Conference. Available at: https://shorturl.at/x6Dh1 (accessed: 7.08.2016)
Crofts L. (2016) Antitrust Watchdogs are Realizing Power of ‘Big Data'. EU data chief says. Mlex Global Antitrust. Available at: http://www.mlex.com/GlobalAntitrust/DetailView.aspx?cid=783261&siteid=190&rdir=1 (accessed: 30.09.2016)
De Mauro A., Greco M., Grimaldi M. (2016) Formal Definition of Big Data Based on its Essential Features. Library Review, vol. 65, no 3, pp. 122-135.
Engels B. (2016) Data Portability among Online Platforms. Internet Policy Review, vol. 5, no 2. Available at: http://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/data-portability-among-online-platforms (accessed 27.09.2016).
Gal M.S., Rubinfeld D.L. (2016) The Hidden Costs of Free Goods: Implications for Antitrust Enforcement. Antitrust Law Journal. Available at: http://awards.concurrences.com/IMG/pdf/galrubinfeld_final2.pdf (accessed: 16.08.2016)
Guniganti P. (2016) Laitenberger: DG Comp May Enforce in E-Commerce. Global Competition Review. Available at: http://globalcompetitionreview.com/news/article/41886/laitenberger-dg-comp-may-enforce-ecommerce/ (accessed: 22.09.2016)
Lahart J. (2016) How Wal-Mart's Store Closings Paint Wider Retail Picture: Shift to Online Sales Shows Difference between Retailing's Haves and Have-Nots. Wall Street Journal. January 15. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/how-wal-marts-store-closings-paint-wider-retail-picture-1452871692 (accessed: 3.11.2016)
MacLennan M. (2016) Netherlands Starts Big Data Probe. Global Competition Review. Available at: http://globalcompetitionreview.com/news/article/41893/netherlands-starts-big-data-probe (accessed: 12.08.2016)
Marmer V., Shneyerov A., Kaplan U. (2016) Identifying Collusion in English Auctions. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2738789 (accessed: 17.11.2016)
Schepp N.P., Wambach A. (2016) On Big Data and its Relevance for Market Power Assessment. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol. 7, no 2, pp. 120-124.
Sokol D., Comerford R. (2016) Does Antitrust Have a Role to Play in Regulating Big Data? Cambridge Handbook of Antitrust, Intellectual Property and High Tech. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2723693 (accessed: 6.10.2016)
Stucke M., Ezrachi A. (2016) Virtual Competition. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 368 p.
Stucke M., Grunes A. (2016) Big Data and Competition Policy. Oxford: University Press. Available at: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/big-data-and-competition-policy9780198788133?cc=fr&lang=en& (accessed: 10.10.2016)
Copyright (c) 2017 Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.













