Interstate Economic Cooperation in Eurasia: Actual Options of Development (International Legal Aspect)
Аннотация
World economic power is becoming increasingly dispersed, a process accompanied by a greater role played by various international economic associations of states in regulating international economic relations. The article devoted to the fragmentation of international law demonstrates this kind of law can be grouped according to uncoordinated regulatory entities and proposes a solution to this issue. The factors in this fragmentation are analyzed through the prism of current processes in Eurasian regional economic integration. The approaches to coordinating the laws of regional economic associations with the regulations of the WTO are also reviewed. The new formats of regional intergovernmental economic cooperation in Eurasia, such as the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) and the Silk Road Economic Belt (SREB) are analyzed. The EEU and the SREB are presently the main drivers of the transformation of Eurasia into a zone of joint development. These projects share a common goal and can harmoniously complement each other, and their potential linkage makes possible the formation of a common economic space on the Eurasian continent. The Joint Statement on Cooperation on the Construction of Joint Eurasian Economic Union and Silk Road Projects (signed by Presidents Putin and Li Xin on May 8, 2015) raises some serious issues. The main one concerns the comparison and further development of the EEU and the SREB and possible ways to have them complement each other in practice. At the Astana Club in 2015 three potential options of co-existence of the projects were considered: bilateral connection (meaning that EEU countries would be free to decide on participation in SREB), linkage within an EEU-China format, and linkage within the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (the SCO). In this paper the author attempts to identify effective solutions to the problems surrounding this process. The conclusion is effective development of the new integration projects of Russia and China on the basis of the SCO is optimal. A mechanism for international legal regulation of economic cooperation entailing a gradual economic convergence of Eurasia is proposed.
Литература
Abdullin A.I. (2015) Fragmentatsiia mezhdunarodnogo prava: problemy i perspektivy. Aktual'nye problemy sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava: materialy XII ezhegodnoi mezhd. nauchno-praktich. konferentsii pamiati prof. I.P. Blishhenko. A.H. Abashidze (ed.). Moscow: RUDN, 564 pp. (in Russian)
Bordachjov T.V. (2015) Novoe evraziistvo. Rossiia v global'noi politike, no 5. Available at: //www.glo-balaffairs.ru/number/Novoe-evraziistvo-17754 (accessed: 10.09.2016)
Davletgil'deev R.S. (2013) K voprosu o podkhodakh k fragmentatsii mezhdunarodnogo prava. Rossiiskii juridicheskii zhurnal, no 3. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/57741390/ (accessed: 10.09.2016)
Doklad Mezhdunarodnogo diskussionnogo kluba “Valdai” (2015)“K Velikomu Okeanu. 3 ekonomicheskii poias Shelkovogo putii. Prioritety sovmestnogo razvitiia evrazijskikh gosudarstv”... Moscow, 25 pp.
Drezner D. (2009) Regime Proliferation and the Tragedy of the Global Institutional Commons. 32 pp. Available at: http://fletcher.tufts.edu/~/media/Fletcher/Microsites/Fila/PDFs/FILA Discussion Paper No 0109.pdf (accessed: 10.09.2016)
Dupuy P. (2007) A Doctrinal Debate in the Globalization Era: On the “Fragmentation” of International Law. European Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 1, pp. 25-41. Available at: http://www.ejls.eu/1/4UK.pdf (accessed: 10.09.2016)
Gusejnov O.R. (2015) Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomicheskaia integratsiia v sfere mezhdunarodnogo prava. Evraziiskii juridicheskii zhurnal, no 1. Available at: http://weurasialaw.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7080:2015-02-26-09-22-04&catid=109:2010-06-17-09-48-32 (accessed: 10.09.2016)
Hafner G. (2000) Riski fragmentatsii mezhdunarodnogo prava // Ezhegodnik Komissii mezhdunarodnogo prava, vol. II, 369 pp.
Lavranos N. (2009). The Brazilian Tyres Case: Trade Supersedes Health. Trade, Law and Development, vol. 1, no 2, pp. 191-230.
Leben C. (2010) The Advancement of International Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 339 pp.
Lomakin V.K. (2007) Mirovaia ekonomika. Uchebnik [The Global Economics. Textbook]. Moscow: Unity-Dana, 672 pp. (in Russian)
Pauwelyn J. (2004) Bridging Fragmentation and Unity: International Law as a Universe of Inter-Connected Islands, Michigan Journal of International Law, no 25, pp. 905-915.
Pauwelyn J. (2007) Legal Avenues to “Multilateralizing Regionalism”: Beyond Article XX (2012). Geneva, 35 pp. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/con_sep07_e/pauwelyn_e.pdf (accessed: 10.09.2016).
Platsas A. (2012) The Idea of Legal Convergence and Electronic Law. Values and Freedoms in Modern Information Law & Ethics, pp. 679-688.
Plotnikov A.V. (2013) Evolutsiia doktrinal'nykh podhodov k ponimaniju i otsenke fragmentatsii mezhdunarodnogo prava. Rossiiskii juridicheskii zhurnal, no 3, pp. 15-19.
Slaughter A.M. (2004) A New World Order. Oxford: University Press, 341 pp.
Smbatjan A.S. (2011) WTO i regional'nye integratsionnye ob”edineniia: so otnoshenie “pravovykh sil” v uregulirovanii torgovykh sporov. Rossiiskii vneshnii ekonomicheskii vestnik, 8th edition.
Vinokurov E.J., Libman A.M. (2012) Evraziiskaia kontinental'naia integratsiia. [Eurasian Economic Integration]. Saint Petersburg: Vesti, 224 pp. (in Russian)
Copyright (c) 2017 Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-ShareAlike» («Атрибуция — На тех же условиях») 4.0 Всемирная.












