Sources of Law in a Religious Legal System: Common Paradigm Behind External Differences
Аннотация
The article analyses the different sources of religious legal systems, principally the sources of the canon law of the Christian church, and it discovers a common paradigm shared by the seemingly different sources of different religious legal systems developed within the Judeo-Christian Biblical legal tradition. The author analyses, on the one hand, the decretal letters of the popes, which formed the main part of the medieval corpus of canon law in the Western Church; and, on the other hand, the writings of the Holy Fathers in conjunction with the imperial legislation and the canons of the Church Councils in the Eastern Church. This analysis elucidates a common paradigm for both traditions of canon law, which may be characterized as an ‘authoritative-instructive’ paradigm. The article shows that the instructive ‘pole’ within that paradigm is a distinctive feature of a religious legal system as such, and goes on to demonstrate its existence in the predecessor of the Christian legal tradition—Jewish law--and to outline similar features in such sources of Jewish law as rabbinic rulings, the King’s Law (the enactments of secular rulers in the context of the Halakha) and the responsa. The key point is that the common paradigm expresses itself in a seemingly different manner mostly in response to external factors—the political, social, and cultural differences between the societies in which each respective system of religious law operates—and not because of religious or theological differences in the actual teachings of the religious legal systems.
Литература
The Didache (1998) A Commentary by K. Niederwimmer. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 288 p.
Didascalia Apostolorum (1969) The Syriac version translated and accompanied by the Verona Latin fragments with an Introduction and Notes by H. Connolly. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 280 p.
Elon M. (1994) Jewish Law: History, Sources, Principles. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society. Vol. I, 474 p.
Eusebius Pamphilius (2007) Church History. Grand Rapids: Kregel Academic Press, 368 p.
Gallagher C. (2007) Church Law and Church Order in Rome and Byzantium: A Comparative Study. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 279 p.
Gratian (1993) The Treatise on Laws (Decretum DD. I-XX). Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 131 p.
Gurevich A.Ya. (2007) Katerorii srednevekovoi kul'tury. Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works]. Saint Petersburg: University, pp. 17-262 (in Russian)
Huxley A. (ed.) (2002) Religion, Law and Tradition: Comparative Studies in Religious Law. N.Y.: Routledge, 186 p.
Jasper D., Fuhrman H. (2001) Papal Letters in the Early Middle Ages. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 225 p.
Lebedev A.P. (2004) Istoiriia razdeleniia Tserkvei v IX, X i XI vekah [A History of Church Division in 9th, 10th and 11th Ages]. Saint Petersburg: Abyshko, 352 p. (in Russian)
Nikodim, Bishop of Dalmatia (1897). Pravoclavnoe tserkovnoe pravo [Orthodox Church Law]. Saint Petersburg: Komarov, 708 p. (in Russian)
Suvorov N.S. (2004) Uchebnik tserkovnogo prava [Textbook of Church Law]. Moscow: Zertzalo, 504 p. (in Russian)
Tsypin V. (2009) Kanonicheskoe pravo [The Canon Law]. Moscow: Sretenskyi monastyr, 864 p. (in Russian)
Van de Wiel C. (2005) History of Canon Law. Louvain: Peters Press, 192 p.
Winroth A. (2000) The Making of Gratian's Decretum. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 245 p.
Copyright (c) 2017 Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-ShareAlike» («Атрибуция — На тех же условиях») 4.0 Всемирная.












