Soft Law Concept in a Globalized World: Issues and Prospects
Abstract
The article is devoted to the soft law concept and its evolution in the modern world. Soft law reduces the degree of uncertainty in the law and at times is the only alternative to abandoning any regulation of people’s interactions. It is pointed out that the norms addressed to particular agents may have different degrees of being mandatory. If we depict the whole system of rules as a continuum and place each rule along it according to how binding it is, then soft law would be placed in the “grey zone” between law and non-law. It is not yet the law, but it is not merely politics, morality, traditions and the like. It is something intermediate between the two. Soft law instruments create uniform “rules of the game” for actors in cross-border relations. The purpose of the soft law concept is to decrease the “zones of uncertainty” in the law. Because of this, soft law, whether it is employed in global law-making systems or not, may be viewed as a source of effective instruments that decrease the level of uncertainty within systems of law. At the same time, the alternative to soft law is not hard law but the absence of any purposeful regulation at all. It is my considered opinion that in the prevailing condition of fragmentation in the official sources of international law, where common approaches are not supported by universal acts and are more typically regulated by bilateral agreements, soft law can offer all interested parties steady, uniform guidelines arrived at through compromise for law-abiding and mutually beneficial behaviour, thus increasing the stability and certainty of cross-border interactions.
References
Abbott K., Snidal D. (2000) Hard and Soft Law in International Governance // International Organization, no 3, pp. 441-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280
Aspremont de J. (2008) Softness in International Law: A Self-Serving Quest for New Legal Materials. European Journal of International Law, no 5, pp. 1075-1093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn057
Barelli M. (2009) Role of Soft Law in the International Legal System: The Case of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2009, no 4, p. 964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589309001559
Blutman L. (2010) In the Trap of a Legal Metaphor: International Soft Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, no 3, pp. 606-624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589310000242
Brummer C. (2010) Why Soft Law Dominates International Finance — And Not Trade. Journal of International Economic Law, no 3, pp. 623-643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgq026
Christians A. (2007) Hard Law & Soft Law in International Taxation. Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Paper № 1049, pp. 7-9.
Cini M. (2001) The Soft Law Approach: Commission Rule-making in the EU's State Aid Regime. Journal of European Public Policy, no 2, pp. 192-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110041541
D'Amato A. (2009) Softness in International Law: A Self-Serving Quest for New Legal Materials: A Reply to Jean d'Aspremont. European Journal of International Law, no 3, pp. 897-910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chp067
Dragneva R. (2004) Is «Soft» Beautiful? Another Perspective on Law, Institutions, and Integration in the CIS. Review of Central and East European Law, no 3, pp. 279-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1573035042132969
Ellis J. (2012) Shades of Grey: Soft Law and the Validity of Public International Law. Leiden Journal of International Law, no 2, pp. 313-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156512000052
Footer M. (2010) The (Re-)turn to Soft Law in Reconciling the Antinomies in WTO Law. Melbourne Journal of International Law, no 2, pp. 241-276.
Gabriel H. (2009) The Advantages of Soft Law in International Commercial Law: the Role of UNIDROIT, UNCITRAl, and the Hague Conference. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, no 3, pp. 655-672.
Robilant A. (2006) Genealogies of Soft Law. American Journal of Comparative Law, no 3, pp. 504-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/54.3.499
Shelton D. (2006) Normative Hierarchy in International Law. American Journal of International Law, no 2, p. 319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002930000016675
Zerilli M. (2010) The Rule of Soft Law: an Introduction. Focaal-Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, no 56, p. 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2010.560101
Copyright (c) 2018 Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












