Digital Assets in Personal Bankruptcy: Experience of the Commonwealth of Australia

Keywords: personal bankruptcy, insolvency, digital assets, cryptocurrency, crypto-wallet, custodian, NFT, Australian legislation

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the issues that arise in process of working with digital assets in personal bankruptcy procedures based on the example of the Australian Union. The legal and practical aspects of identifying and establishing control over the digital assets of an individual debtor are being investigated in order to include them in the bankruptcy estate for sale in the interests of creditors. The dialectical method, formal legal and legal dogmatic methods, as well as methods of system analysis and legal modeling are implemented in the research. The key results of the study demonstrate that digital assets significantly complicate the bankruptcy procedure due to their decentralized nature, anonymity and cross-border nature. The authors identified the main problematic issues related to the identification of asset owners, tracking transactions, gaining control over the debtor’s crypto wallets, including and returning digital assets to the bankruptcy estate, as well as assessing their value in order to implement bankruptcy procedures applied to individuals. It has been established that in the Australian Union, digital assets are considered property in the context of bankruptcy, but there are no special rules for their regulation in bankruptcy procedures. From the point of view of Australian competition law, the legal regime of digital assets is governed by legal norms relating to the debtor’s property as a whole, which have to be adapted due to the unique intangible and decentralized nature of digital assets. The practical recommendations developed by the regulator for persons managing the debtor’s assets and administering the relevant personal bankruptcy procedures, which include various methods for identifying digital assets, recommendations for analyzing transaction evidence, and mechanisms for interacting with the debtor, do not cover the full range of potential problems that may arise in practice. The main conclusions of the study emphasize the need to create a balanced regulatory approach that would encourage voluntary disclosure of information about digital assets and discourage unfair behavior by debtors. For unscrupulous debtors, a set of existing measures should be developed to force the discovery of digital assets and their inclusion or return to the bankruptcy estate.

Author Biographies

Stanislav Odintsov, Peoples’ Friendship Lumumba University

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor. Address: 6 Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow 117198, Russia. E-mail: odintsov_sv@pfur.ru

Maria Gribanovskaya, Peoples’ Friendship Lumumba University

Postgraduate Student. Address: 6 Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow 117198, Russia. E-mail: gracefulmind@yandex.ru

References

Allen J.G., Rauchs M., Blandin A. et al. (2020) Legal and Regulatory Considerations for Digital Assets. CCAF Publications, pp. 1–55. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3712888

Bogdanovskaya I. Y. (2010) The evolution of judicial precedent in «common law». Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki=Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 75–87 (in Russ.)

Burkaltseva D.D. et al. (2017) Financial and economic security of business as a primary element in the economic system. Revista Espacios, vol. 38, no. 33, pp. 3–23.

Edwards F.R. et al. (2019) Crypto Assets Require Better Regulation: Statement of the Financial Economists Roundtable on Crypto Assets. Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 14–19.

Ermakova E.P., Frolova E.E. (2019) Legal Regulation of Digital Banking in Russia and Foreign Countries (European Union, USA, PRC). Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki=Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, Issue 46, pp. 606–625. (in Russ.).

Fang F., Ventre C., Basios M. et al. (2022) Cryptocurrency trading: a comprehensive survey. Financial Innovation, vol. 8. no. 13, pp. 1–59.

Fox D. (2018) Cryptocurrencies in the Common Law of Property. SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 1–42. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3232501

Hill J. (2018) Chapter 3, Money: A Medium of Exchange, Unit of Account, and Store of Wealth. FinTech and the Remaking of Financial Institutions, pp. 41–68.

Jokić S., Cvetković A.S. et al. (2019) Comparative analysis of cryptocurrency wallets vs traditional wallets. Ekonomika, vol. 65. no. 3, pp. 65–75.

Kiselyov A.A. (2025) The significance of judicial decisions in England, Germany and France. Novyy yuridicheskiy vestnik=New Legal Bulletin, no. 2, pp. 36–39 (in Russ.)

Knoll-Csete E. et al. (2024) Regulating cryptocurrencies — legal challenges and risks. Cambridge Open Engage, pp. 1–19. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/673ce7725a82cea2fac1ac96

Korshunova P.V. (2020) Legal Means of Ensuring the Unity of Judicial Practice in Common Law Countries. Elektronnyy zhurnal «Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosu­darstvo»=Electronic journal «Science. Society. State», no. 3, pp. 187–197 (in Russ.)

Reeves P., O’Grady R., Shen E. (2024) Australia. In: J. N. Dewey (ed.) Global Legal Insights Blockchain & Cryptocurrency Regulation. London: Global Legal Group, pp. 210–223. Available at: https://www.acc.com/sites/default/files/resources/upload/Blockchain%20and%20Cryptocurrency%20Regulation%202024.pdf

Remolina N., Gurrea-Martínez A., Liu D. et al. (2024) The Treatment of Digital Assets in Insolvency. In: J. G. Allen et al. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Digital Assets and the Law. Oxford: University Press, pp. 1–25. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4915592

Rozhkova M. A. (2009) Judicial precedent and judicial practice. In: Lawsuits and court decisions: Collection of articles. Moscow: Statut, pp. 320–353 (in Russ.)

Sarra J., Madaus S., Mevorach I. (2023) Chasing assets abroad: Ideas for more effective asset tracing and recovery in cross-border insolvency. International Insolvency Review, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 253–288.

Shahzad M.F. et al. (2024) Crypto currency awareness, acceptance, and adoption: the role of trust as a cornerstone. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1–15.

Subramanian R., Chino T. (2015) The State of Cryptocurrencies, Their Issues and Policy Interactions. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, vol. 24, issue 3, article 2, pp. 24–40. Available at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/jitim/vol24/iss3/2

Published
2025-09-14
How to Cite
OdintsovS., & GribanovskayaM. (2025). Digital Assets in Personal Bankruptcy: Experience of the Commonwealth of Australia. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 18(3), 226-251. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2025.3.226.251
Section
Law in the Modern World