New Code of Civil Proceedings: Outlook

  • Ekaterina Alekseevskaya Institute of Legal Regulation, National Research University Higher School of Economics
Keywords: civil process, arbitration, civil procedure, the principles of civil process, fair trial, court fine, awareness of the cases, exercise rights freely, access to free legal aid, respect for private and public interests, the principle of legal certainty

Abstract

As part of the legislative work of the common rules of civil procedure to be applied by the courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts, the author addresses the problem of unification and codification of principles. The thesis of the need for a broader approach: include major, cross-industry principles and institutions, and the principles of international law relating to the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of the person, including the judiciary ones in the new code. Based on the analysis of the main provisions and principles of international law, the author concludes that there is a need for consolidation in the new code of principles of a fair trial, to be informed with regard to matters affecting the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests; freely exercise procedural rights; access to free legal aid in cases stipulated by the federal law; compliance with private and public interests; compliance with the principle of legal certainty. In this case, the focus is on what part of the principles of the concept of a fair trial is already familiar in civil and arbitration process, and the other part is known only by the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Complaints against the Russian Federation. However, mechanical transfer of the principles already enshrining civil process in the new code will not be consistent with the objectives and purposes of civil proceedings. The principles of civil procedure are necessary to comprehend subject to the progressively developing legal, judicial practice, including the European Court of Human Rights. The author by the example of the openness and consideration of the case within a reasonable time demonstrates the objective necessity of updating the content of the principles of civil proceedings, taking into account the use of electronic public services. The article also draws attention to the need to establish a uniform level of legal safeguards that arise from the generally recognized principles of international law, the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests in judicial and non-judicial proceedings.

Author Biography

Ekaterina Alekseevskaya, Institute of Legal Regulation, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Senior Research Fellow, Candidate of Juridical Sciences

References

Alekseevskaya E.I. (2008) O soblyudenii printsipa pravovoy opredelennosti v proizvodstve v sude nadzornoy instantsii [On the Principle of Legal Certainty in Supervisory Court]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, no 4, pp. 45-50.

Anderson Dzh. (2006) Reforma sudebnoy sistemy v stranakh Evropy i Tsentral'noy Azii [Judicial Reform in Europe and Central Asia]. Proceedings of 7th Research Conference Modernizatsiya ekonomiki i gosudartsvo. State University Higher School of Economics. Moscow: HSE, p. 26 (in Russian)

Glushkova I.B. (2011) Realizatsiya prava na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel'stvo v arbitrazhnom protsesse (Avtoref. diss. Kand. Jurid. Nauk) [Implementing the Right to Fair Trial in Arbitration (Summary of candidate of juridical sciences dissertation)]. Saratov, 26 p. (in Russian)

Gom'en D., Zvaak L. (1998) Evropeyskaya konventsiya o pravakh cheloveka i Evropeyskaya sotsial'naya khartiya: pravo i praktika [European Convention on Human Rights and European Social Charter]. Moscow: MNIMP Publishing, 600 p. (in Russian)

Kalistratova R.F. (2001) Dostupnost' i effektivnost' pravosudiya v proektakh GPK i APK [Accessibility and Efficiency of Judgement in GPK and APK Projects]. Prikhod'ko I.A. (ed.) Problemy dostupnosti i effektivnosti arbitrazhnogo i grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Issues of Accessibility and Efficiency of Arbitration and Civil Proceedings]. Moscow: Legist, pp. 99-104 (in Russian)

Khabrieva T.Ya., Marku Zh. (eds.) (2011) Administrativnye protsedury i kontrol' v svete evropeyskogo opyta. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».

Kozhevnikova Yu.S., Alekseevskaya E.I. (2013) Informatsionnye tekhnologii kak tochka soprikosnoveniya organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti, osushchestvlyayushchikh nadzornye polnomochiya [IT as Contact Points for Supervisory Bodies of Executive Power]. Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie, no 9, pp. 35-38.

Morshchakova T.G. [ed.] (2012) Standarty spravedlivogo pravosudiya (mezhdunarodnye i natsional'nye praktiki) [Fair Justice Standards (International and Internal Practice)], Moscow: Mysl', 584 p. (in Russian)

Osokina G.L. (2004) Grazhdanskiy protsess. Obshchaya chast' [Civil Process. General Part]. Moscow: Yurist, 669 p. (in Russian)

Rabtsevich O.I. (2003) Pravo na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel'stvo: mezhdunarodnoe i vnutrigosudarstvennoe pravovoe regulirovanie (Avtoref. diss. Kand. Jurid. Nauk) [Right to Fair Trial: International and Internal Legal Regulation (Summary of candidate of juridical sciences dissertation)]. Kazan, 25 p. (in Russian)

Rakhmanina T.N. (2005) Kodifikatsiya zakonodatel'stva [Codification of Legislation]. Moscow: Yurist, 141 p. (in Russian)

Rekhtina I.V. (2010) Nadzornoe proizvodstvo v grazhdanskom protsesse: voprosy teorii i praktiki: monografiya [Review Proceedings in Civil Process: Theory and Practice: Monograph]. Moscow: Yurlitinform, pp. 133-171 (in Russian)

Ryazanovskiy V.A. (2005) Edinstvo protsessa: uchebnoe posobie [Uniformity of Process. Manual]. Moscow: Gorodets, 80 p. (in Russian)

Sakhnova T.V. (2004) Novye GPK i APK RF: edinstvo protsessa? [New GPK and APK RF: a Uniform Process?]. Proceedings of Research Conference Comparative Analysis and Topical Problems of Law Enforcement. Moscow: Russian Academy of Justice, pp. 25-34.

Zhuykov V.M. (2006) Sudebnaya reforma: problemy dostupa k pravosudiyu [Judicial Reform: Issues of Accessibility to Judgement]. Moscow: Statut, 283 p. (in Russian)

Zimnenko B.L. (2003) Normy mezhdunarodnogo prava v sudeyskoy praktike Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Posobie dlya sudey [International Law Norms in Russian Federation Judicial Practice. Manual for Judges]. Moscow: RAP Publishing, 198 p. (in Russian)

Published
2015-02-19
How to Cite
AlekseevskayaE. (2015). New Code of Civil Proceedings: Outlook. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (2), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2015.2.4.16
Section
Legal Thought: History and Modernity