International Cooperation Between Russia and the United States in Extradition of Persons for the Purposes of Prosecution: Challenges and Opportunities
Abstract
The article analyzes current state of Russian-American cooperation in legal matters, namely in extradition of persons for the purposes of criminal prosecution. Moreover, it examines factors, which negatively affect such cooperation. It demonstrates that one of the consequences of deteriorating relations between the two countries is a politically motivated virtual US refusal to cooperate with the Russian Federation in extradition and the focus of the United States on mechanisms to ensure Russian citizens’ stay in the US territory, which is justified by the KerFrisbie Doctrine. The article studies US legal regulation and sources of the US law regarding extradition. Special attention is paid to the implementation of treaties as a legal basis for the US international cooperation in extradition. It indicates the difference both in the status and in application of bilateral treaties of the United States on extradition and multilateral treaties on extradition and on combating certain crimes, to which the US is a party. The author concludes that it is possible to positively resolve a matter of extradition from the US territory for criminal prosecution only provided that a bilateral agreement with the requesting party exists. The article studies significance and distinguishing characteristics of judicial precedents as sources of legal regulation of extradition in the United States. Furthermore, the article provides an examination as to how judicial precedents deal with matters decided at the consideration of requests for extradition, as well as distinguishing characteristics of the US criminal procedure in this sphere. It analyzes legal regulation of the reciprocity principle in the US international cooperation in extradition. It shows the impossibility of its implementation in Russian-American cooperation. The author strongly recommends to take into consideration polysystemic nature of legal regulation of extradition in Russian-American cooperation. Furthermore, the author stresses that legal requests for extradition must contain data on those matters that are decided by American courts. It is emphasized that in Russian-American cooperation it is impossible to refer to the principle of reciprocity as a legal basis for extradition, and that a bilateral Russian-American agreement on extradition is much needed. The article also provides reasons for implementation of Convention for reciprocal extradition of criminals of 1887, as neither Russia nor the United States after it became effective took actions to terminate the treaty or to withdraw from it.
References
Bassiouni M.C. (2008) Extradition: law and practice of the United States. International Criminal Law. Vol. 2, pp. 269-341.
Boytsov A.I. (2004) Extradition of criminals. Saint Petersburg: Legal Center Press, 795 p. (In Russ.).
Ermolaeva N.V. (2014) Practice of the European Court of Human Rights in cases of extradition from Russia to the CIS states. Police international cooperation of the CIS states against crime: papers of international conference. Moscow: Academy of Internal Ministry, 2014, pp. 78-85. (In Russ.).
Extradition of individuals for criminal prosecution or execution (1997) G.V. Dashkov (ed.). Moscow: 1997. (In Russ.).
Jason S. (2013) A forgotten instrument: 1887 US.-Russia Extradition Treaty. Voprocy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava = Russian and International Law, no. 9-10, pp. 62-87.
Karpovich O.G. (2019) International legal problems of extradition of Russian citizens at the request of US law enforcement agencies. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yusticiya=International Criminal Law and International Justice, no. 5, pp. 19-24. (In Russ.)
Litvishko P.A. (2014) On the issue of some non-contractual forms of extraterritorial law enforcement. Vestnik Akademii Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossijskoj Federacii = Bulletin of Academy of Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, no. 2, pp. 101-106. (In Russ.).
Litvishko P.A. (2019) Protection of the rights of suspects and accused in international legal cooperation of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation. In: International cooperation of the Prosecutor's Office in the field of protecting human and civil rights and freedoms: papers of the round table. Moscow: University of Prosecutor's Office, pp. 50-83. (In Russ.).
Litvishko P.A. et al (2015) International cooperation in the field of combating crime: selected issues. Non-contractual forms of extraterritorial criminal procedure and other law enforcement activities. Papers on international cooperation. Moscow: Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, 304 p. (In Russ.)
Lukashuk I.I., Naumov A.V. (1998) Extradition of accused and convicted persons in international criminal law. Moscow: Jurait, 160 p. (In Russ.).
Lyakhov E.G. (2012) Extradition and the principle “aut dedere aut judicare”: formation and modern issues. Publichnoe i chastnoe pravo = Public and private law, no. 2, pp. 165172. (In Russ.).
O'Higgins P. (1964) The History of Extradition in British Practice. 1174-1794. In: Indian Yearbook of International Affairs, vol. XIII, pp. 75-115.
Parry J.T. (2002) The Lost History of International Extradition Litigation. Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 43, pp. 79-108.
Safarov N.A. (2005) Extradition in international criminal law: theory and practice. Moscow: Wolters Kluver, 416 p. (In Russ.).
Shcherba S.P. (2016) International cooperation of Russia in the field of extradition of persons for criminal prosecution on the basis of the principle of reciprocity. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yusticiya = International Criminal Law and International Justice, no. 4, pp. 3-8. (In Russ.).
Tatarinov M.K. (2019) Spatial action of criminal jurisdiction. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo=International Law, no. 2, pp. 1-13 (In Russ.).
Tomsinov V.A. (2011) The case of the memorial of Tsarevich Nikolai in Nice (Article 4). Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta=Moscow State University Bulletin, no. 4, pp. 16-35. (In Russ.)
Trenina D.V. (2015) Violations of Articles 3 and 5 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms found by the ECHR in Russian expulsion cases. Part I. Biblioteka kriminalista = Criminalist's Library, no. 6, pp. 298-315. (In Russ.).
Trenina D.V. (2016) Violations of Articles 3 and 5 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms found by the ECHR in Russian expulsion cases. Part II. Biblioteka kriminalista=Criminalist's Library, no. 1, pp. 305-317. (In Russ.).
Valeev R.M. (1976) Extradition of criminals in modern international law. Kazan: University, 126 p. (In Russ.).
Van den Wijngaert C. (1983) The Political Offence Exception to Extradition: Defining the Issues and Searching for a Feasible Alternative. Revue Belgie de Droit Internationale, pp. 745-746.
Copyright (c) 2021 Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.