Compulsory Enforcement of Arbitrary Award as a «Public» Element of Procedural Form of Arbitration
Abstract
Over extended periods attempts are made to apply alternative dispute resolution methods in general and arbitration legal proceedings among other things in the Russian legal system. Despite of the legal norms that have existed in this sphere for a long time, there are complex problems preventing subjects that are in a legal relationship from using arbitration proceeding for the defense of rights to the full. This refers to the necessity of creating a proper remedy device by means of arbitration and the following enforcement of the judgment rendered by arbitration court. In the article we validate the conclusion that broad interpretation of a procedural form grants an opportunity of forming holistic comprehension of the remedy device in the framework of implementation of the alternative form (arbitration). The research is aimed at the activity approach (allows to focus the law, legal institutions and norms on achieving practical results) within which justice as well as arbitration is analyzed in view of administration of law. Functioning of a state court is defined as public administration of law, while arbitration is referred to as private process of law realized in a procedural form. The main criteria for separation of these two processes of considering and resolving civil disputes is the legal nature of the organ that deals with the case. The application of activity approach for the analysis of the essence of arbitration contributes to characteristics of arbitration in context of the remedy device for subjects’ civil rights. The remedy device in the framework of an alternative form is not limited exclusively to arbitration proceeding; thus the procedural form being private in its nature is supplemented by an optional «public» element. We demonstrate the legal nature of compulsory enforcement of arbitrary award as an integral part of a uniform system aimed at practical restoration of rights of the subjects in case the dispute between them was resolved by means of arbitration. In the content of the «public» element of the procedural form we distinguish stages that are realized by appropriate state organs. Specific character of the «public» element that provides an opportunity of compulsory enforcement of arbitration award is implementation of activity in civil procedural form.
References
Abramov S.N. (1952) Soviet civil process. Moscow: Gosjurizdat, 420 p. (In Russ.).
Anufrieva L.P. (2001) International private law. Moscow: BEK, 768 p. (In Russ.).
Avdyukov M.G. (1959) Judicial decision. Moscow: Gosjurizdat, 192 p. (In Russ.).
Bazilevich A.I. (2001) Forms of protection of subjective civil rights. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Ulyanovsk, 29 p. (In Russ.).
Bolgova V.M. (2000) Forms of protection of subjective law: theoretical issues. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Samara, 38 p. (In Russ.).
Civil law (2006) E.A. Sukhanov (ed.). Moscow: Wolters Kluwer, 330 p. (In Russ.).
Civil procedure (2007) M.K. Treushnikov (ed.). Moscow: Gorodetz, 258 p. (in Russ.).
David R. (1953) Arbitrage en droit compare. Revue international de droit compare, no. 1, p. 15.
David R. (1985) Arbitration in international trade. Deventer: Kluwer, 482 p.
Degtyarev S.L. (2007) Implementation of judicial power in civil proceedings: theoretical and applied issues. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer, 364 p. (In Russ.).
Engelman I.E. (1912) Course of the Russian civil proceedings. Yuriev: Mattisen, 646 p. (In Russ.).
Gavrilenko V.A. (2006) Arbitration of disputes as a guarantee of protection of rights and interests of business entities. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Saint Petersburg, 26 p. (In Russ.).
Gromoshina N.A. (2010) Differentiation, unification and simplification in civil proceedings. Moscow: Prospect, 264 p. (In Russ.).
Himazova E.N. (2007) Arbitration protection of civil rights. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Kazan, 24 p. (In Russ.).
Kanyukaeva A.R. (2010) Procedural forms of protection in the Russian law. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Saratov, 23 p. (In Russ.).
Karimova R.R. (2008) Legal responsibilities: essence and implementation. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Ekaterinburg, 22 p. (In Russ.).
Kleinman A.F. (1967) Latest trends in Soviet civil procedural law. Moscow: MGU Press, 119 p. (In Russ.).
Krasnokutsky V.A. (1924) Essays on civil procedural law. Experience of systematization of legislation of the RSFSR and the USSR on legal and civil proceedings. Kineshma: Local union press, 172 p. (In Russ.).
Kurochkin S.A. (2004) Theoretical and legal bases of arbitration proceedings in the Russian Federation. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Ekaterinburg, 26 p. (in Russ.).
Kurochkin S.A. (2007) Arbitration of civil cases in the Russian Federation: theory and practice. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer, 253 p. (In Russ.).
Kurochkin S.A. (2017) Arbitration and international commercial arbitration as forms of private law enforcement. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement, no. 2, pp. 219-226. (In Russ.).
Lebedev M.Yu. (2005) Development of the jurisdiction institute and its manifestation in the arbitration court. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Saratov, 30 p. (In Russ.).
Letuta T.V. (2013) Legal nature of arbitration court's decision. Sovremennoye pravo = Modern law, no. 5, pp. 72-75. (In Russ.).
Maleshin D.Ya. (2011) Civil procedural system of Russia. Moscow: Statute, 495 p. (In Russ.).
Malyshev K.I. (1874) Course of civil proceedings. Saint Petersburg: Stasulevich, 449 p. (In Russ.).
Mikhailova E.V. (2014) Procedural forms of protecting subjective civil rights, freedoms and legitimate interests in Russia (judicial and non-judicial). Moscow: Prospect, 280 p. (In Russ.).
Muradyan E.M. (2003) Judicial law (in the context of three procedural codes). Moscow: Prospect, 128 p. (In Russ.).
Muranov A.I. (2014) In support of arbitration projects of the Justice Ministry. Arbirazhnyi sud = Arbitration court, no. 2/3, pp. 274-318. (In Russ.).
Popov M.A. (2002) The Russian model of regulating of arbitration courts activity: theory and practice. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Saint Petersburg, 23 p. (In Russ.).
Pronin M.P. (2010) Presumption in the modern Russian law. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Nizhny Novgorod, 29 p. (In Russ.).
Reshetnikova I.V., Yarkov V.V. (1999) Civil law and civil procedure in modern Russia. Ekaterinburg: Norma, 312 p. (In Russ.).
Rozhkova M.A. (2005) World transaction: use in commercial turnover. Moscow: Statute, 572 p. (In Russ.).
Rozhkova M.A. (2006) Means and methods of legal protection of the parties to a commercial dispute. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer, 392 p. (in Russ.)
Sakhnova T.V. (2014) Course of civil procedure. Moscow: Statute, 784 p. (In Russ.).
Skvortsov O. Yu. (2017) Arbitration (arbitration proceedings) in the Russian Federation. Moscow: Yurait, 239 p. (In Russ.).
Stremoukhov A.V. (2017) Human Right to protection and forms of its protection in Russia. Leningradskyi juridicheskyi zhurnal = Leningrad Legal Journal, no. 1, pp. 9-19. (In Russ.).
Vaneev A.S., Dyakin D.B. (2010) Validity of an arbitration clause in Russian and foreign practice. Vestnik mezhdunarodnogo commercheskogo arbitrazha = Bulletin of international commercial arbitration, no. 1, pp. 28-45.
Zaitsev A.I. (2004) Arbitration proceedings in Russia. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Saratov, 26 p. (In Russ.).
Zhilin G.A. (2000) Goals of civil proceedings and their implementation in the court of first instance. Moscow: Gorodetz, 320 p. (In Russ.).
Zhuikov V.M. (1997) Judicial protection of the rights of citizens and legal entities. Moscow: Gorodetz, 318 p. (In Russ.).
Copyright (c) 2021 Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
