Public Interest and Genesis of Administrative Law
Abstract
The origin and development of administrative law is a long process. His study requires the establishment of basic prerequisites, as well as circumstances leading to the transition from generation to emergence, from emergence to formation, from one stage of development to the next. It is fair to recognize the public awareness of public interests as the basic prerequisite for the emergence of administrative law. Not the interests of an individual or their group, but the interests of the state and society as a whole. The subsequent complication of the system of public interests, expressed in various integrative-differential processes, determined, among other things, the progressive development of administrative law. This study aims to establish patterns that reflect the interdependence that exists between the development of the public interest system and the genesis of administrative law. An analysis of these patterns allowed us to conclude that there is a functional dependence between the system of public interests and administrative law, which is expressed in the fact that public awareness of public interests was the basic prerequisite for the emergence of administrative law. The subsequent genesis of administrative law was due to the development of the system of public interests, its complication, expressed in deepening integrative-differential processes within it. The methodology of this study is based on a complex of various means and methods of scientific knowledge. Its foundation is formed by general means, such as observation, abstraction, induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, ascent from the abstract to the concrete. Due to the fact that the system of public interests and administrative law are considered in their development, the philosophical basis of this study is the dialectical approach. At the special-industry level of knowledge, formal-legal, historical, comparative methods are used. The specificity of the chosen subject of research also requires the use of logical, structural-functional and factor analysis. If necessary, the reliability of the results of the study is ensured by bringing verified empirical data, as well as a description of specific historical events. The structure of this article is determined by the goal of establishing the relationship that exists between the system of public interests and the genesis of administrative law, which involves the consideration of the following issues: the concept of public interest, the subject and method of administrative law in the context of the history of their comprehension, the impact of foreign legal doctrines on the scope of administrative regulation in Russia, the features of the formation and development of the science of administrative law, the main definitions of public administration and its meaning in public life.
References
Andrievsky I. (1874) Police law. Saint Petersburg: Pratz, 666 p. (In Russ.).
Antonovich A. (1883) Police law and political economy. Kiev: No publisher, 256 p. (In Russ.).
Arzhanov M. (1940) Subject and method of legal regulation in connection with the question of the system of Soviet law. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo = Soviet State and Law, no. 8-9, pp. 16-24. (In Russ.).
Bergbohm K. (1892) Jurisprudence and legal philosophy: critical treatises. Leipzig: Duncker, 566 p.
Bertsinsky S.M. (1931) Administrative law. In: Small Soviet encyclopedia. Moscow: Encyclopedia, p. 165. (In Russ.).
Boden J. (1999) Six books about the state. In: Anthology of world political thought. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl, pp. 689-695. (In Russ.).
Bunge N. (1869) Police law. Moscow: University, 334 p. (In Russ.).
Chapman B. (1972) The Police State. Munich: List, 193 p.
Deryuzhinsky V.F. (1911) Police Law. Saint Petersburg: Senate press, 562 p. (in Russ.).
Desnitskiy S.E. (1952): The concept of the establishment of legislative, judicial and punitive power in the Russian Empire. In: Selected works of Russian thinkers of the second half of the 18th century. Moscow: Politizdat, pp. 78-93. (In Russ.).
Detterbeck S. (2011) General administrative law with administrative procedural law. Munich: Beck, 680 p.
Elistratov A.I. (1911) Administrative Law. Moscow: Sytin, 235 p. (In Russ.).
Elistratov A.I. (1922) Sketch of administrative law. Moscow: Gosizdat, 236 p. (In Russ.).
Gambarov Y.S. (1911) Civil law course. Saint Petersburg: Stasulevich, 502 p. (In Russ.).
Garcia Garrido M.H. (2005) Roman private law: incidents, claims, institutions. Moscow: Statut, 812 p. (In Russ.).
Gedeman Y.V. (1924) Main features of commercial law: transformation of ownership concept. Kharkov: Jurizdat, 32 p. (In Russ.).
Gershkovich B. (1999) Economic interests and their implementation. Pyatigorsk: University, 589 p. (In Russ.).
Iering R. (2003) Purpose in law. Selected works. Saint Petersburg: Juridicheskiy Center, pp. 87-436. (In Russ.).
Ilyin I.A. (1994) General doctrine of law and state. Works. Vol. 4. Moscow: Russkaya kniga, pp. 151-392. (In Russ.).
Karadzhe-Iskrov N.P. (1927) The latest evolution of administrative law. Irkutsk: Gosizdat, 39 p. (In Russ.).
Kildyushov O. (2013) Police as science and politics: birth of modern order from philosophy and political practice. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie = Sociological Review, no. 3, pp. 9-40. (In Russ.).
Kobalevsky V.L. (1924) Essays on Soviet administrative law. Kharkov: Gosizdat, 258 p. (In Russ.).
Leontiev A.N. (1977) Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow: Politizdat, 282 p. (In Russ.).
Locke J. (1988) Two tracts on government. Works. Vol. 3. Moscow: Mysl, pp. 137405. (In Russ.).
Malinovskaya V.M. (2017) Development of administrative law science in Germany. Pravo i upravlenie = Law and management, no. 1, pp. 51-58. (In Russ.).
Marx K. (2013) The Capital. Moscow: Eksmo, 800 p. (In Russ.).
Marx K., Engels F. (1955) The Holy Family. Works. Vol. 2. Moscow: Politizdat, pp. 3-230. (In Russ.).
Maslow A.H. (1970) Motivation and Personality. N.Y.: Harper & Row, 386 p.
Mayer O. (1895) German administrative law. Vol. 1. Leipzig: Duncker, 482 p.
Meyer D.I. (1997) Russian civil law. Moscow: Statut, 307 p. (In Russ.).
Mole R. (1868) Encyclopedia of state sciences. Saint Petersburg: Wolf, 591 p. (In Russ.).
Montesquieu S.L. (2018) About the spirit of laws. Moscow: Eksmo, 690 p.
Muromtsev S.A. (1879) Definition and basic division of law. Moscow: Mamontov, 198 p. (In Russ.).
Novgorodtsev P.I. (1896) Historical school of lawyers. Its origin and destiny. Moscow: University, 225 p. (In Russ.).
Petrazhitskiy L.I. (1910) Theory of law and state in connection with theory of morality. Vol. 2. Saint Petersburg: Merkushov, 800 p. (In Russ.).
Pokrovsky I.A. (2003) Main issues of civil law. Moscow: Statut, 618 p. (In Russ.).
Roman private law (2014) I.B. Novitsky, I.S. Peretersky (eds.). Moscow: Zertsalo, 607 p. (In Russ.).
Rozhdestvensky N.F. (1840) State welfare system as applied to Russian laws. Saint Petersburg: Grech, 465 p. (In Russ.).
Savigny F.C. (2012) On the vocation of our time to legislation and jurisprudence. System of modern Roman law. Moscow: Statut, pp. 18-36. (In Russ.).
Shaikenov N.A. (1990) Legal support of individual interests. Sverdlovsk: University, 200 p. (In Russ.).
Shershenevich G.F. (1995) Russian civil law. Moscow: Spark, 422 p. (In Russ.).
Stein L. (1874) Doctrine of management and the law of management. Saint Petersburg: Gieroglifov, 594 p. (In Russ.).
Studenikin S.S. (1939) Subject and system of Soviet administrative law. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo = Soviet state and law, no. 3, pp. 42-55. (In Russ.).
Studenikin S.S. (1938) Questions of Soviet administrative law. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo = Soviet state and Law, no. 1, pp. 24-36. (In Russ.).
Subochev V.V. (2008) Legitimate interests. Moscow: Norma, 496 p. (In Russ.).
Tikhomirov Y.A. (1995) Public law. Moscow: BEK, 422 p. (In Russ.).
Vitoria F. (2013) Lecture on civil power. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie = Sociological Review, no. 3, pp. 52-75. (In Russ.).
Vlasov V.A., Evtikhiev I.I., Studenikin S.S. (1950) Soviet administrative law. Moscow: Gosjurizdat, 439 p. (In Russ.).
Wedel J. (1973) Administrative law of France. Moscow: Progress, 512 p. (In Russ.).
World history: in 6 vols. M., 2011. Vol. 1. 900 p.
Yakovlev V.F., Talapina E.V. (2012) The role of public and private law in the regulation of the economy. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava = Journal of Russian law, no. 2, pp. 5-16. (In Russ.).
Zhuchkov V.A. (1996) From the history of German philosophy of 18th century: pre-classical period. Moscow: Nauka, 387 p. (In Russ.).
Zorkin V.D. (1978) Positivist theory of law in Russia. Moscow: University, 270 p. (In Russ.).
Copyright (c) 2021 Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
