Expanding Boundaries of Antimonopoly Liability in Russian and European Law: Effective Market Regulation or Creating Legal Uncertainty?
Abstract
Today, the trends in the development of antimonopoly legislation are such that the industry is formed not only within the framework of the national legal regime of states, it is also built through the implementation of existing international legal institutions into the domestic legislation of a particular state. In this context, the Russian legal order is also making appropriate attempts to adapt some of the institutions of European law, in particular on the issues of imputing liability for violations of cartel prohibitions. In the presented article, the author made an attempt to assess the most striking trend in antimonopoly regulation — the prospects for introducing the institution of antimonopoly liability in relation to a corporate group into the Russian legal order (through the prism of analyzing the antimonopoly legislation of the countries of the European Union). The author pays special attention to the grounds for imputing liability to a legal entity for violation of antitrust laws committed by another legal entity within the same corporate group. Special attention is paid to corporate structures of the conglomerate type in the context of the applicability of Art. 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to these groups of companies. In a recent judgment in the Sumal case, the European Court of Justice ruled that the injured parties of a cartel could, under certain circumstances, bring a claim for damages against a subsidiary when the parent company was found guilty of this violation. While some authors argue that the court actually redefined the concept of an economic entity, the author refers to the case law of the European Court of Justice and proves the existence of a similar practice of imputing liability in the Russian legal order. The article draws conclusions regarding the contradiction between objectives of antimonopoly regulatory policy and the general principles of limited corporate liability. Also, the author emphasizes that the use of a formal approach, in which real violators of cartel prohibitions can refer to the limitations of their responsibility, while economically or administratively controlling the behavior of other economic entities within the group, is unacceptable in the conditions of the dominance of transnational and digital corporations.
References
Alekseeva E.A. (2020) An economic entity in competition law. Problemy nauki = Issues of Science, no. 1, pp. 67-71 (in Russ.)
Aleshin D.A. (2007) Modern world trends in the development of state regulation of competition. In: Modernization of the economy and the state. Vol. 3. Moscow: Higher School of Economics, 691 p. (in Russ.)
Alison J. (2012) The Boundaries of an Undertaking in EU Competition Law. European Competition Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 301-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5235/ECJ.8.2.301
Bailey D. (2018) Competition Law. Oxford: University Press, 1152 p.
Barennes M., Braeken B., Versteeg J. (2021) ECJ Redefines the «Economic Entity» Doctrine and Rules that a Subsidiary May be Liable for Behavior of Its Parent Company. Available at: URL: https://inlnk.ru/yO0adP (accessed: 10.11.2022)
Belikova K.M., Bezbakh V.V. (2006) Prohibited business practice and its qualifying features under the law of the EU and MERCOSUR countries: Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia, Peru and Chile. Pravo i politika = Law and Politics, no. 8, pp. 122-133 (in Russ.)
Boulba M., Potapova K. (2022) Cartels and Leniency Review: Russia. In: The Cartels and Leniency Review. J. Buretta, J. Terzaken (eds.). London: Law Business Research Ltd., pp. 234-242.
Boyd M. (2021) Of undertakings, legal entities and groups of companies. The CJEU's judgment in Sumal. Available at: URL: https://inlnk.ru/ZZM9L8 (accessed: 10.11.2022)
Cauffman C. (2020) Beyond Skanska. The Court of Appeal of Leeuwarden's Latest Decision in Tenne T. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3512364 (accessed: 10.11.2022) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3512364
Chirita A. (2014) A legal-historical review of the EU competition rules. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 281-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589314000037
Egorova M.A. (2018) Competitive law: textbook. M.: Justicinform, 628 p. (in Russ.)
Frank H., Fischel D. (1985) Limited Liability and the Corporation. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol52/iss1/3 (accessed: 10.11.2022) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1599572
Freund B. (2021) Reshaping Liability: Concept of Undertaking Applied to Private Enforcement of EU Competition Law. GRUR International, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 731-743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikab002
Ghetti R. (2018) Unification, Harmonization and Competition in European Company Forms. European Business Law Review, issue 5, pp. 813-842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/EULR2018031
Ibáñez Colombo A. (2021) Of undertakings, legal entities and groups of companies. Available at: https://chillingcompetition.com/2021/10/07/of-undertakings-legal-entities-and-groups-of-companies-the-cjeus-judgment-in-sumal-c-882-19/ (accessed: 10.11.2022)
Kalintiri A. (2018) Revisiting parental liability in EU competition law. European Law Review, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 145-166.
Karahan I. (2020) The Single Economic Entity Doctrine: Is There a Common. Concept of Undertaking in EU Competition Law? Available at: https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=9019824&fileOId=9019827 (accessed: 10.11.2022)
Klotz M. (2016) Wirtschaftliche Einheit und Konzernhaftung im Kartellzivilrecht. Köln: Heymanns, 336 p. (in German)
Koenig C. (2017) An Economic Analysis of the Single Economic Entity Doctrine in EU Competition Law. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, vol. 13, pp. 281-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhx009
Koskinen K. (2000) Institutional Illusions Translating in the EU Commission. The Translator, vol. 1, pp. 49-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2000.10799055
Marcos F. (2021) The Uneven and Unsure Playing Field for Competition Damages Claims in the EU: Shortcomings and Failures of Directive 2014/104/EU and Its Implementation. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, no. 52, pp. 468-476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-021-01046-w
Sauter W., Schepel H. (2009) State and Markets in the European Union Law. Cambridge: University Press, 246 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626647
Semeusov V.A., Kulish A.V. (2008) About economic entities and business entities. Izvestiya BSU = Bulletin of BSU, no. 3, pp. 116-119 (in Russ.)
Usatorre A. (2021) Red pill or blue pill? The European Court of Justice makes its choice: subsidiaries can be held liable for the infringements of their parent companies (Case C-882/19 Sumal). Available at: URL: https://inlnk.ru/YAMakK (accessed: 10.11.2022)
Vogel L. (2018) European Competition Law. Paris: Bruylant, 840 p.
Wagener M. (2019) Follow-Up to Skanska — The «Implementation» by National Courts So Far. European Papers, vol. 6, pp. 1323-1337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3455993
Whelan P. (2022) Private Enforcement and the Imputation of Antitrust Liability. In: B. Rodger, F. Marcos, M. Ferro (eds.). Research Handbook on Competition Law Private Enforcement in the EU. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 562 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800377523.00014
Wils W. (2000) The undertaking as subject of EC competition law and the imputation of infringements to natural or legal persons. European Law Review, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 99-116.
Copyright (c) 2022 Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.