Cryptovalues in the Russian Law: Surrogates, «Other Property» and Digital Money
Abstract
The article describes the key issues of legal regulation of cryptocurrency, which emerged in Russian doctrine and jurisprudence in 2015-2020. The article considers nature of “ownership” of cryptocurrency, status of cryptocurrency as an object of property rights, legal ratio of “cryptocurrency”, “money” and “money surrogate” in Russian law. Author describes the chronology of legislative activity concerning cryptocurrency and related issues, marks the main milestones. The author compares the problems arising in practice with the solutions proposed by the Russian law. The structure of the article fits the purpose of the research — to determine the problems of cryptocurrency' legal regime and to evaluate how Russian Law coped with arising tasks. The first two parts of the article are devoted to civil and financial issues of the legal regime of the cryptocurrency and to the proposed legal options. The third part of the article is devoted to the bills and adopted laws on the legal regime of the cryptocurrency. The work of the legislator has been reviewed and evaluated from various perspectives. As a result, the conclusion was made that the Russian regulator gravitates towards a prohibitive cryptocurrency policy. Such policy is determined both by the traditions of the Russian market regulation and by Russia's international obligations as a member of FATF. The author states that during the development of Russian laws on cryptocurrency, a full analysis of the consequences of the regulatory ban was not carried out, the volume of the cryptocurrency market was not estimated, and alternative bills were not considered by officials. The courts, which could, to a certain extent, assume the role of filling the legal gap, failed to take on this role and have only noted the legal uncertainties regarding the cryptocurrency. It is expected that soon the Russian legislator will establish sanctions for violations of cryptocurrency laws and define obligations and prohibitions in the area of crypto asset issuance and trading. After that discussion about the nature of cryptocurrency rights and the civil law regime of cryptocurrency will be closed.
References
Aldoshkina A.D. (2020) Numerus Clausus of property rights: genesis and rationale of dogma. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava, no 4, pp. 45-93 (in Russian)
Bashkatov M.L. (2018) Contemporary theory of money from classical German civil law point. In: Civil Law. Modern aspects of doctrine, law and jurisprudence. Moscow: Statute, pp. 42-81 (in Russian)
Bashkatov M.L. (2006) Dogmatic construction of legal tender. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava, no 2, pp. 42-64 (in Russian)
Dabrowski M., Janikowski L. (2018) Virtual currencies and central banks monetary policy: challenges ahead. Brussels: European Parliament, 33 p.
DuPont Q. (2018) Experiments in algorithmic governance: A history and ethnography of the DAO. In: Bitcoin and Beyond: Cryptocurrencies, Blockchains, and Global Governance. M. Campbell-Verduyn, ed. L.: Routledge, pp. 157-177.
Efimova L.G. (2001) Banking contracts: law and practice. Moscow: NIMP, 654 p. (in Russian)
Efimova L.G. (2019) Cryptocurrencies as an object of civil law. Hozyaistvo i pravo, no 4, pp. 17-25 (in Russian)
Enikolopov R., Zhuravskaya E., Guriev S. (2002) Budgetary federalism in Russia: Development scenarios. Moscow: CEFIR press, 34 p. (in Russian)
Experience of Free Banking (2002) K. Dowd, ed. L.: Routledge, pp. 7-47.
Fedorov D.V. (2018) Tokens, cryptocurrency and smart contracts in national bills in comparison with foreign experience. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava, no 2, pp. 30-74 (in Russian)
Galperin M.L. (2018) Enforcement actions as penalties. Lex russica, no 3, pp. 9-22 (in Russian)
Genkin A.S. (2002) Private money: history and state-of-art. Moscow: Alpina, 518 p. (in Russian)
Gleeson S. (2018) Legal concept of money. Oxford: OUP, 256 p.
Hayek F. (1990) Denationalization of Money. L.: Institute of Economic Affairs, 144 p.
Ivanov A.A. (2019) Shades of grey: absolute and relative rights. Zakon, no 5, pp. 103-109 (in Russian)
Lessig L. (2006) Code. N.Y.: Basic Books, 410 p.
Lives of the eminent philosophers (1986). Diogenes Laertius. Moscow: Mysl, 572 p. (in Russian)
Lunts L.A. (2004) Money and monetary obligations in civil law. Moscow: Statut, 350 p. (in Russian)
Lunts L.A. (1948) Monetary obligation in civil law and conflict law of capitalist countries. Legal Studies, vol. 14, pp. 3-215 (in Russian)
Merrill T., Smith H. (2000) Optimal standardization in the law of property: The numerus clausus principle. Yale Law Journal, issue 1, pp. 1-70.
Mertvischev A.V. (2012) Natural obligation in Russian civil law. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Ekaterinburg, 25 p. (in Russian)
Nemova M.I. (2020) Cryptocurrency an object of property crimes. Zakon, no 8, pp. 145154 (in Russian)
Nersesov N.O. (1889) On bearer securities: view of civil law. Moscow: University, 187 p. (in Russian)
Novoselova L.O. (2017) On the legal nature of bitcoin. Hozyaistvo ipravo, no 9, pp. 3-16 (in Russian)
Proctor C. (2012) Mann on the Legal Aspect of Money. Oxford: OUP, 1035 p.
Roshkova M.A. (2020) Property rights for new intangible assets in the system of absolute rights. Law of Digital Economy-2020: yearbook. Moscow: Statut, pp. 5-79 (in Russian)
Rubalov A.O. (2018) Lura in re: numerus clausus vs. numerus apertus. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava, no 7, pp. 144-162 (in Russian)
Sannikova L.V. (2019) Digital experiments of Russian legislator. Imuschestvennye otnoshenia, no 12, pp. 80-89 (in Russian)
Sannikova L.V., Kharitonova Yu.S. (2020) Digital Assets. Moscow: Print, 304 p. (in Russian)
Saveliev A.I. (2016) Contract law 2.0: “Smart” contracts as the beginning of the end of classical contract law. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava, no 3, pp. 32-59 (in Russian)
Saveliev A.I. (2017) Cryptocurrencies in the system of civil rights objects. Zakon, no 8, pp. 136-153 (in Russian)
Saveliev A.I. (2018) On risks of tokenization and blockchainizaition of private law. Zakon, no 2, pp. 36-52 (in Russian)
Sazhenov A.V. (2018a) Cryptocurrencies and monetary surrogates: contacts and separation between concepts. Predprinimatelskoye pravo, no 1, pp. 57-60 (in Russian)
Sazhenov A.V. (2018b) Cryptocurrencies: dematerialization of property category in civil law. Zakon, no 9, pp. 106-121 (in Russian)
Sklovskiy K.I., Kostko V.S. (2018) On the concept of things. Money. Real estate. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudia, no 7, pp. 115-143 (in Russian)
Skryabin S.V. (2004) Thing as an object of civil rights: theoretical issues. Jurist, 2004, no 6, pp. 34-39 (in Russian)
Sukhanov E.A. (2017) The Property Law. Moscow: Statut, 560 p. (in Russian)
Tolkachev A.Yu., Zhuzhzhalov M.B. (2018) Cryptocurrency as property: analysis of status. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudia, no 9, pp. 91-135 (in Russian)
Uspenskiy M. (2017) Legitimized Bitcoin. Available at: URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2017/12/13/legitimnyj_bitkoin (accessed: 12.04.2020)
Zhuzhzhalov M.B. (2019) Blockchain and international legal regime of cyberspace activity. Pravovedenie, no 1, pp. 62-96 (in Russian)
Copyright (c) 2020 Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
