Nature of Disposal of Property from Possession at the Institute for Protection of bona fide Acquirer

  • Dmitry Malbin All-Russian State University of Justice, 2/1 Azovskaya Street, Moscow 117638, Russia
Keywords: civil law, will, ownership, vindication claim, bona fide acquirer, possession, thing

Abstract

One of the conditions for the protection of a bona fide acquirer is the nature of the disposal of property from the possession of the owner or the person to whom the thing was transferred into the possession of the owner. To date, the categories of will and possession remain controversial in the context of such a condition, which creates uncertainty in law enforcement. Possession in this condition should be understood as the actual domination of a person over the object of possession. At the same time, the theory of legal ownership is not applicable to the institution of protection of a bona fide acquirer. The will in that condition cannot be understood solely as a desire to transfer a thing and arise at the time of such transfer. The will to dispose of a thing from possession is formed before the transfer and is enclosed in the basis of the transfer of the thing. If the basis for the disposal of property from possession arose against the will and, thus, diverges from the will of the owner, then the transfer of property to them, even if committed voluntarily, indicates the disposal of property from possession against the will. If there are several persons authorized to alienate a thing, the will of the person who owns and alienates the property matters. At the same time, despite the fact that in the text of Article 302 of the Russian Civil Code of the it is indicated that the owner has the right to claim the property when it has left the possession of the owner and the person to whom the owner transferred the thing, against his will, the nature of the disposal of the thing from the possession of the person to whom it was transferred to those to whom the owner himself transferred it also matters the thing. Despite the fact that in art. 302 of the Civil Code, among the cases when the owner has the right to claim property, theft is called, such a term nevertheless has no criminal content, since there is no relationship between civil and criminal law in this matter. The Institute for the Protection of a bona fide acquirer contains regulatory legal norms and is applied regardless of the criminal legal qualification and the existence of a verdict in a criminal case.

References

Alekseev V.A. (2019) On possession of real estate. Zakon=Law, no. 9, pp. 146-156 (in Russ.)

Chelyshev M.Yu. (2008) The system of intersectoral relations of civil law: a civilian study. Doctor of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Kazan', 501 p. (in Russ.)

Cherepakhin B.B. (2001) Works on civil law. Moscow: Statut, 476 p. (in Russ.)

Chuchaev A.I. (2019) Commentary on the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Prospect, 1536 p. (in Russ.)

Erohova M.A. (2018) On the disposal of a thing from the possession of the owner at his will when sold at auction. Comment on the Definition of the Judicial Board for Civil Cases of the Armed Forces of the Russia of 12.12.2017 No. 5-KG17-214. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii=Bulletin of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation, no. 5, pp. 10-17 (in Russ.)

Korotkova M.V. (2015) Ensuring a balance between interests of the owner and a bona fide acquirer in the application of Article 302 of the Civil Code. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika=The Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice, no. 11, pp. 41-45 (in Russ.)

Latyev A.N. (2005) The scope of the concept of ownership in modern civil law. Arbitrazhnye spory=Arbitration Disputes, no. 2, pp. 153-157 (in Russ.)

Lorents D.V. (2020) The will of the owner to dispose of real estate from his possession: in the context of vindication. Rossiiskii sud'ya=Russian Judge, no. 7, pp. 9-15 (in Russ.)

Oigenzikht V.A. (1983) Will and Expression of Will: Essays on the theory, philosophy and psychology of law. Dushanbe: Donish, 256 p. (in Russ.)

Rudokvas A.D. (2011) Controversial issues of doctrine of the acquisition prescription. Moscow: Zakon, 304 p. (in Russ.)

Russo J.-J. (1998) On the social contract. Moscow: Kanon, 414 p. (in Russ.)

Shirvindt A.M. (2015) On the issue of the disposal of a thing from the possession of the owner against his will in the context of the restriction of vindication. In: About the property: collection of papers. Moscow: Statut, pp. 334-361 (in Russ.)

Sergeev A.P. (2020) Civil law. Vol. 1. Moscow: Prospect, 1040 p. (in Russ.)

Sklovskii K.I. (2014) The application of property law. Comment on Resolutions of Plenum of Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 10 and No. 22, April 29, 2010; July 11, 2011, No. 54; Presidium of Supreme Court of Russian Federation Letter, January 15, 2013, No.153. Moscow: Statut, 205 p. (in Russ.)

Strel'nikov P.A. (2021) Vindication suit as a legal measure to protect the property rights of legal entities. Yurist=Lawyer, no. 5, pp. 49-55 (in Russ.)

Yakovlev V.F. (2012) Selected works. Vol. 2: Civil Law: history and modernity. Moscow: Statut, 351 p. (in Russ.)

Published
2024-03-30
How to Cite
Malbin D. (2024). Nature of Disposal of Property from Possession at the Institute for Protection of bona fide Acquirer. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (1), 68-92. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2024.1.68.92
Section
Russian Law: Condition, Perspectives, Commentaries