Essence and Hypostases of Law: Development of Integrative Understanding Law

Keywords: legal understanding, essence of law, hypostasis, integrative legal understanding, social regulator, conflict resolution instrument, legal freedom

Abstract

The article is an attempt to develop and justify the author’s concept of an integrative understanding of law. According to the authors, integrative legal understanding becomes especially necessary and relevant in the context of postclassical scholar rationality, striving to overcome contradictions between the main classical approaches to the concept and essence of law. The paper shows these approaches are not ideologically views of law that are antagonistic to each other, since they are inevitably united in their ideas about the essence of law as a social regulator, bringing to the fore various aspects (hypostases) of the unified essence of law, which creates theoretical prerequisites for the creation of a unified (integrative) legal understanding. The purpose of this work is to study the relationship between the essence of law and its hypostases, which are interconnected and mutually complementary manifestations of the essence that are subject to philosophical understanding and theoretical knowledge. The following tasks are addressed: to examine the main hypostases of law as a means of constructing legal reality, a social regulator, a method of conflict resolution, a means of social communication, etc., to demonstrate the relationship between the hypostases and features of law, to reveal the significance of legal freedom as an essential dimension of law, and to explore the implementation of the definition of law in various modes of legal existence. The article concludes the category of the essence of law, that serves as a worldview prerequisite for its theoretical knowledge, is not explicable by rational-discursive means. According to the authors, the essence of law is revealed through a set of hypostases that form the basis of the formal-logical and theoretical definition of law. The features of the definition are related to the hypostases of law, which are specific to different modes of legal existence. In practical activities, various features of law can be taken as a basis, which leads to pluralism and multiple definitions of law used by lawyers for practical or didactic purposes. As demonstrated in the work, this pluralism does not indicate the incompatibility of the main approaches to defining law and may be overcome at a higher level of theoretical understanding, namely, at the level of understanding the aspects of law that manifest different aspects of its essence.

Author Biographies

Igor V. Levakin, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Doctor of Sciences (Law), Professor, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow 101000, Russia, levakin@yandex.ru

Nikolay V. Razuvaev, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Doctor of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor, North-Western Institute of Management, the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 57/43 Sredny Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 119178, Russia, razuvaev-nv@ranepa.ru

References

Berman G. (1998) The Western Legal Tradition: Era of Formation. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 624 p. (in Russ.)

Canan R., Mize G. et al. (eds.) (2018) Tough Cases: Judges Tell the Stories of some of the Hardest Decisions they’ve ever Made. N.Y.: New Press, 320 p.

Castells M. (2000) The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Moscow: Higher School of Economics, 608 p. (in Russ.)

Chestnov I.L. (2012) Postclassical theory of law. Saint Petersburg: Alef-Press, 650 p. (in Russ.)

Chetvernin V.A. (2010) Issues of Legal Theory. Moscow: Higher School of Economics, 155 p. (in Russ.)

Chirkin V.E. (1993) Three Hypostases of the State. Gosudarstvo i pravo=State and Law, no. 8, pp. 107–116 (in Russ.)

Erlich O. (2011) Basics of the Sociology of Law. Saint Petersburg: University, 704 p. (in Russ.)

Hall J. (1947) Integrative Jurisprudence. Interpretation of Modern Legal Philo­sophies. New York: Oxford University Press, 807 p.

Hegel G.V.F. (1990) Philosophy of Law. Moscow: Mysl’, 524 p. (in Russ.)

Jacobs L., McManus M. (2023) Against Post-Liberal Courts and Justice: Rescuing Ronald Dworkin’s Legacy. Palgrave: Springer International, 191 p.

Jellineck G. (1905) System der subjektiven öffentlichen Rechte. Tübingen: Mohr und Siebeck, 366 S.

Ihering R. (1874) The Struggle for Law. Moscow: K.P. Soldatenkov, 77 p. (in Russ.)

Kennedy D. (2006) The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought. Washington: Beard Books, 320 p.

Lazarev V.V. (2023) Integrative Understanding Constitutionalism. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, no. 5, pp. 39–53 (in Russ.)

Leist O. E. (2002) The Essence of Law. Issues of Theory and Philosophy of Law. Moscow: Zertsalo-M, 288 p. (in Russ.)

Nazarenko A.F. (2019) Plato’s Logos as the Logos of his Ideas. Kant=Kant, no. 2, pp. 251–254 (in Russ.)

Nersesyants V.S. (1997) Philosophy of Law. Moscow: Norma, 652 p. (in Russ.)

Olkhovikov B.A. (1985) Theory of Language and Type of Grammatical Description in the History of Linguistics. Formation and Evolution of Grammatical Description Canon in Europe. Moscow: Nauka, 280 p. (in Russ.)

Pashentsev D.A. (2016) Main Issue of Jurisprudence in Context of the Typology of Understanding Law. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki=Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Legal Sciences, no. 4, pp. 37–43 (in Russ.)

Polyakov A.V. (2003) In Search of an Integral Type of Understanding Law. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava=History of State and Law, no. 6, pp. 3–8 (in Russ.)

Polyakov A.V. (2023) General Theory of Law. Moscow: Prospekt, 832 p. (in Russ.)

Popondopulo V.F. (2020) Understanding Law: Critical Review of Main Concepts. Rossijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal=Russian Law Journal, no. 3, pp. 15–29 (in Russ.)

Reinach A. (2001) A Priori Foundations of Civil Law. Collected Works. Moscow: Dom intellektualnoi knigi, pp. 153–326 (in Russ.)

Searle J. (1986) What is a Speech Act. New in Foreign Linguistics. Vol. 17, pp. 151–169 (in Russ.)

Shafirov V.M. (2017) Integrative Legal Understanding and Hard Positivism. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, no. 7, p. 24–33 (in Russ.)

Skvoznikov A.N. (2025) Evolution of Legal Understanding in the General Theory of Law. Yuridicheskij vestnik Samarskogo universiteta=Juridical Journal of Samara University, no. 4, pp. 20–30 (in Russ.)

Van Hook M. (2012) Law as Communication. Saint Petersburg: University, 288 p. (in Russ.)

Wittgenstein L. (1994) A logical and philosophical treatise. Philosophical works. Moscow: Gnosis, pp. 1–73 (in Russ.)

Published
2026-06-16
How to Cite
LevakinI. V., & RazuvaevN. V. (2026). Essence and Hypostases of Law: Development of Integrative Understanding Law. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 19(2), 4-30. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2026.2.4.30
Section
Legal Thought: History and Modernity