Genesis of Term “Private International Law” in the Russian Doctrine of the 19th Century: from Legal Heritage to Modernity

Keywords: private international law, history, doctrine, term, Russian pre-revolutionary literature, priority, well-known fact

Abstract

The article is the result of the authors' study of the texts of Russian pre-revolutionary scholars in order to establish when exactly and by whom the term “Private International Law” was introduced into legal content by publishing in a publicly available printed publication. The purpose of the study is to search for new data and facts to introduce them into scientific circulation, to try to eliminate gaps and close the “blank spots” in the history of the science of Private International Law. The methodology of the study is historical and dogmatic methods, deduction and induction, methods of comparative analysis and comparative law. The article emphasizes that any “well-known facts” in legal science (especially those related to its history) should be approached with great caution, not allowing them to transform into cliches that hinder the search for and perception of new information. The authors analyze how the “well-known fact” that the first to introduce the term “Private International Law” belongs to prof. N.P. Ivanov has become established in the Russian doctrine. The focus is also on the works of modern Russian experts who have refuted this “fact”, but whose discoveries are still practically not in demand in educational and scientific literature. In the course of studying the prerevolutionary legal heritage, the authors were able to establish that the term “Private International Law” was first published in print in 1856, and its authorship belongs to prof. D.I. Kachenovsky. The second author to publish this term in print was V.I. Perogovsky (1859), the third was N.S. de Galet (1860), and the fourth was prof. A.N. Stoyanov (1862). It is concluded that to date, the merit of introducing the term “Private International Law” into scholar circulation in Russia belongs to prof. D.I. Kachenovsky. Of course, these data are relevant only until new information is found. Contrary to popular belief, Russian pre-revolutionary literature on Private International Law is extremely rich and has not been fully studied; its careful study is always necessary from both a theoretical and a practical point of view.

Author Biographies

Natalia Erpyleva, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Doctor of Sciences (Law), Professor

Irina Getman-Pavlova, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor

References

Abdullin A.I. (2004) Essays on History of the Science of Private International Law in Russia (Understanding Nature of Private International Law by Domestic Law Scholars of the19th — Early 20th centuries). Kazan: University, 72 p. (in Russ.)

Bakhin S.V. (2022) Origins of Private International Law Studies in Russia. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, no. 4, pp. 56-66 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2022.040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2022.040

Boguslavsky M.M. (a) (1994) Private International Law. Moscow: Miezhdunarodnye otnoshenia, 416 p. (in Russ.)

Boguslavsky M.M. (b) (ed.) (1994) Private International Law: Modern Issues. Moscow: TEIS, 507 p. (in Russ.)

Boguslavsky M.M., Lisitsyn-Svetlanov A.G., Trunk A. (eds.) (2013) Modern Private International Law in Russia and the European Union. Book 1. Moscow: Norma, 655 p. (in Russ.)

Danevsky V.P. (1876) Essay on the Latest Literature on International Law. Saint Petersburg: 2nd Department of His Majesty's Chancellery, 274 p. (in Russ.)

Dmitrieva G.K. (2015) History of the Science of Private International Law. Vestnik universiteta O.E. Kutafina=Bulletin of the Kutafin University, no. 2, pp. 22-41 (in Russ.)

Feldman D.I. (1956) History of the Science of International Law at Kazan University (1804-1917). Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta=Scholar Works of Kazan University, vol. 116, book 13, pp. 42-43 (in Russ.)

Galet N.S. (1860) International Law. Saint Petersburg: E. Prats, 139 p. (in Russ.)

Grabar V.E. (2005) Materials for the History of the Literature of International Law in Russia (1647-1917). Moscow: Zertsalo, 888 p. (in Russ.)

Ivanov N.P. (1865) Grounds for Private International Jurisdiction. Kazan: University, 56 p. (in Russ.)

Kachenovsky D.I. (a) (1863) International Law. Outlined by De Galet. A review. Zhurnal ministerstva yustitcii=Journal of Justice Ministry, vol. 16, pp. 207-228 (in Russ.)

Kachenovsky D.I. (b) (1863) Course of International Law. Kharkov: University, 120 p. (in Russ.)

Kachenovsky D.I. (1856) International law of the Ancient Greeks. Laurent's article, translated by D.I. Kachenovsky. Propylaea: Collection of Articles on Classical Antiquity. Book V. Moscow: University, pp. 225-247 (in Russ.)

Kapustin M.N. (1873) International Law. Lecture notes. Yaroslavl: Provincial Zemstvo Council, 86 p. (in Russ.)

Kamarovsky L.A. (1892) Main Issues of the Science of International Law. Moscow: University, 92 p. (in Russ.)

Kanashevsky V.A. (2024) Private International Law. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenia, 1180 p. (in Russ.)

Kazansky P.E. (1902) Textbook of Public and Civil International Law. Odessa: Economic Printing House, 532 p. (in Russ.)

Khrabskov V.G. (1979) The Relationship between Public International and Private International Law in the Russian Pre-revolutionary Doctrine. Pravovedenie=Jurisprudence, no. 5, pp. 9-96 (in Russ.)

Komnatnaya Yu.A. (2012) On Introducing the Term “International Private Law” into Scholar Circulation in the Domestic Pre-revolutionary Legal Doctrine. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal chastnogo i publichnogo prava=International Public and Private Law, no. 4, pp. 14-16 (in Russ.)

Komnatnaya Yu.A. (2011) Evolution of the Domestic Doctrine on Conflict of Laws in the mid-19th-early 20th Centuries. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Stavropol, 29 p. (in Russ.)

Krivenkiy A.I. (2019) Doctrine of Private International Law of N.P. Ivanov. Vestnik MGPU. Pravo=Bulletin of Moscow Pedagogical University. Law, no. 3, pp. 52-59 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9113.2019.35.3.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9113.2019.35.3.06

Krylov S.B. (1930) Private International Law: a manual. Leningrad: Priboy, 328 p. (in Russ.)

Lunts L.A. (2002) Course of Private International Law. Moscow: Spark, 1007 p. (in Russ.)

Merezhko A.A. (2006) Science of Private International Law: History and Modernity. Kiev: Takson, 356 p. (in Russ.)

Nolde B.E. (1923) History of Russian Conflict Law. Trudy Russkih uchynykh za rubezhom=Works of Russian scholars abroad, vol. II, pp. 126-148 (in Russ.)

Nolde B.E. (1899) Conflict of Laws on Inheritance. Vestnik prava=Bulletin of Law, September, pp. 1-42 (in Russ.)

Nolde B.E. (1917) M.I. Brun (1860-1916) and the Science of Private International Law in Russia. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava=Bulletin of Civil Law, no. 3, pp. 5-25 (in Russ.)

Peretersky I.S. (1925) Essays on Private International Law of the RSFSR. Moscow: Gosizdat, 141 p. (in Russ.)

Peretersky I.S., Krylov S.B. (1940) Private International Law: a manual. Moscow: Yurizdat, 208 p. (in Russ.)

Perogovsky V.I. (1859) Beginnings of International Law on Foreigners among Peoples of the Ancient World. Kiev: University, 51 p. (in Russ.)

Sadovsky F. (1903) Grounds of Private International Law and its Application in the Field of Inheritance by Law. Warsaw: Academic Print, 98 p. (in Russ.)

Shalland L.A. (1901) On the Application of Foreign Laws by Russian Courts. Pravo=Law, no. 27, pp. 1304-1309 (in Russ.)

Starodubtsev G.S. (2000) International Legal Science of Russian Emigration (1918-1939). Moscow: Kniga i Biznes, 292 p. (in Russ.)

Stoyanov A.N. (1862) Methods of Developing Positive Law and the Social Significance of Lawyers from the Glossators to the End of the 18th Century. Kharkov: Chekhovsky and Zarin Printing House, 277 p. (in Russ.)

Published
2025-04-01
How to Cite
ErpylevaN., & Getman-PavlovaI. (2025). Genesis of Term “Private International Law” in the Russian Doctrine of the 19th Century: from Legal Heritage to Modernity. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 18(1), 27-57. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2025.1.27.57
Section
Legal Thought: History and Modernity