Legal Acts of Manchukuo and Mengjiang: Comparative Analysis
Abstract
The article based of archival and previously unpublished research material is an attempt to restore the legal regulations system of Manchukuo and Mengjiang that had been created as independent states in Manchuria, Inner Mongolia, and North-East China in the 1930s. The internal and external policies of both political entities were controlled by the Japanese occupation forces. Manchukuo was created as a model state, the standard one, including the matters of public administration and law, and the Mongol-Go was a resource (economic) base of the occupants. The example of Manchukuo serves as a model to show the mechanism of pushing the local authorities to adopt the new legislation, the hierarchy of acts is built at both the initial and later stages of national development. The article provides the characteristics, features and attributes differentiating normative and individual legal acts. The legal nature of law and its place in the system of normative legal acts of both countries are analyzed; the detailed description of the legal acts originating from the various agencies of state power is given. The state system and the public authorities involved in the rule making process are studied; the bodies that participated in the development and adoption of the legislation are marked, as well as the agencies responsible for the administrative ordinance and administrative enactment. The case of Mengjiang facilitated to study the law technique, its features and drawbacks, as well as the reasons for those drawbacks. The authors conclude that in spite of the spiritual, cultural and religious closeness of the two peoples, the building of the state system in terms of rule-making bodies, and the system of normative legal acts differed much in Manchukuo and Mengjiang due to the goals that the Japanese occupation forces sought and that were largely encouraged by the local leadership of the occupied territories. Manchukuo and Mengjiang were eliminated on the 18th and 19th of August, 1945 respectively by the troops of the Soviet Union and Mongolia.
References
Dudin P.N. (2016) Pravo i pravovaya sistema Mentszyana [Law and Legal System of Mengjiang]. Gosudarstvo i pravo, no 8, pp. 72-79.
Dudin P.N. (2015) Pravovaya osnova deyatel'nosti organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti Man'chzhou-Go (na materialakh nauchnykh trudov russkogo yuridicheskogo fakul'teta v Kharbine) [Legal Pattern of State Bodies in Manchukuo (Materials of Harbin Russian Law Faculty)]. Vlast', no 11, pp. 176-180.
Jackson R. (1990) Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 225 p.
Jackson R., Rosberg C. (1982) Why Africa's Weak States Persist: The Empirical and the Juridical in Statehood. World Politics, vol. 35, no 1, pp. 1-24.
Karaeva K.A. (2005) Man'chzhou-Go (1931-1945): «marionetochnoe» gosudarstvo v sisteme mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy na Dal'nem Vostoke [Manchukuo 1931-1945: Marionette State in International Relations in the Far East]. Ural'skoe vostokovedenie, issue 1, pp. 75-89.
Keydun I.B., Eliseeva Ya.A. (2010) Obshchaya kharakteristika sistemy vysshikh gosudarstvennykh organov Manch'zhou-Go [General Characteristics of the System of Manchukuo Higher State Bodies]. Vestnik Amurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, issue 48, pp. 33-36.
Nehru J. (1981) Vzglyad na vsemirnuyu istoriyu [Look at World History]. Vol. 3. Moscow: Progress, 453 p. (in Russian)
Onon U., Pritchart D. (1989) Asia First Modern Revolution: Mongolia Proclaims Its Independence in 1911. Leyden: Brill, 203 p.
Oppenheim L. (1948) Mezhdunarodnoe pravo [International Law]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo inostrannoi literatury, 408 p. (in Russian)
Owen L. (1955) Nationalism and Revolution in Mongolia. New York: Oxford University Press, 186 p.
Ryazanovskiy V.A. (1927) Sovremennoe grazhdanskoe pravo Kitaya: Vyp. 1: Ocherk deystvuyushchego kitayskogo grazhdanskogo prava [Modern Civil Law of China: Issue 1. Outline of China Applicable Civil Law]. Harbin: Zarya, 198 p.
Sun Tsun”e (2010) Osobennosti pravovoy sistemy psevdo-rezhima v Mentszyane [Legal Systems of Pseudo Regime in Mengjiang]. In'shan: akademicheskiy zhurnal. Sotsial'nye nauki, May, pp. 78-84. (宋从越, 伪蒙疆政权立法的特点, 包头师范学院, 政治与法律学院, 内蒙古, 包头, 阴山学刊 (社会科学版), 2010年05期23 (5)).
Tilov T.K. (2015) Mezhdunarodnye svyazi gosudarstvopodobnykh obrazovaniy [International Relations of Statelike Establishments]. Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, no 1, pp. 282-285.
Tszin' Khay (1986) Politicheskaya vlast' v Mentszyane [Political Power in Mengjiang]. Sobranie kommentariev k novoy istorii Vnutrenney Mongolii. [Comments to Modern History of Inner Mongolia]. Khukh-Khoto: Vnutrenney Mongolii Press, 246 p. (金海, 白拉都格其. 蒙疆政权. 内蒙古近代史译丛 (第一辑). 呼和浩特: 内蒙古人民出版社).
Zakhchid S. (2005) Moi vospominaniya o De Vane i Vnutrenney Mongolii [My Memoirs on De Wan and Inner Mongolia]. Pekin: Izdatelstvo kitayskoy istorii i literatury, 613 p. (札奇斯钦: 《我所知道的德王和当时的内蒙古, 中国文史出版社, 2005年版).
Copyright (c) 2017 Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.













