On Concretization of Law in Conditions of Digitalization of Public Practice

  • Oleg A. Stepanov Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Keywords: digitalization, the specification of law, terrorism using telecommunications networks, normative programming, the concept of “minimum contacts”, a risk-oriented approach, monitoring, artificial intelligence

Abstract

The article analyzes the phenomenon of concretization of law in the conditions of digitalization. An example of the problem of countering terrorism with the use of telecommunications networks shows the significance of concretization in modern conditions. The author considers concretization as a tool for improving legal regulation in conditions of digitalization. Attention is drawn to the fact that the need for concretization of legal norms in modern conditions is conditioned by their specialization, which takes into account the technological features of digitalization, and the level and nature of the theoretical comprehension of this phenomenon lags behind the existing needs of legal practice, the processes of updating legal matter. The article points out that the problem of specifying the law with regard to the sphere of digitalization of networks and technologies related to counteracting terrorism has not been adequately studied at either the theoretical or the practical level, although the transition to electronic management of technological processes in production, according to Russian and foreign experts, are a prerequisite for the implementation of terrorist activities using information and telecommunications networks. At the same time, a significant part of Internet services are now interdependent, because “cloud” technologies allow the availability of distributed computing powers between different jurisdictions, i.e. the modern Internet service represents the system of legal relations, architecturally distributed across several jurisdictions, within the framework of which the users of such Internet service belong to different jurisdictions. Regulatory programming is considered as a promising tool for specifying. It is noted that the specification is intended to give the law maximum certainty in the process of law enforcement activities on the basis of the methodology of the concept of “minimum contacts” and a risk-oriented approach and monitoring of legislation using artificial intelligence.

Author Biography

Oleg A. Stepanov, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

Professor, Chief Researcher, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Juridical Sciences. Address: 34 Bol'shaya Cheremushkinskaya Str., Moscow 117218, Russian Federation. E-mail: o_stepanov@hotbox.ru

References

Barnashev A. (2000) Eksterritorial'naya yurisdiktsiya v SShA: doktrina «minimal'nykh kontaktov» [Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in the US: the Doctrine of “Minimal Contacts”]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, no 5, pp. 46-47.

Cherdantsev A.F. (1974) Pravovoe regulirovanie i konkretizatsiya prava [Legal Regulation and Specification of Law]. Primenenie sovetskogo prava [Application of Soviet Law], vol. 30, pp. 21-22, 35 (in Russian)

Ershov V.V. (2015) Konkretizatsiya prava [Concretization of Law]. Konkretizatsiya prava: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy. Materialy IX Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii [Concretization of Law: Theoretical and Practical Issues. Papers of the IX International Conference] Moscow: RPMU Press, p. 47 (in Russian)

Goyman V.I. (1992) Deystvie prava [Action of Law]. Moscow: Academy of Internal Ministry, 182 p. (in Russian)

Gredeskul N.A. (1906) Sovremennye voprosy prava [Modern Issues of Law]. Kharkov: Braitygam, pp. 15-16 (in Russian)

Kudryavtsev Yu.V. (1981) Normy prava kak sotsial'naya informatsiya [Norms of Law as Social Information]. Moscow: Juridicheskaya literatura, 125 p. (in Russian)

Lazarev V.V. (1982) Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie aspekty primeneniya prava [Socio-Psychological Aspects of the Application of Law]. Kazan: University, 144 p. (in Russian)

Marx K., Engels F. (2014) Debaty v shestom reinskom landtage. Soch. T. 1. [The Debates at 6th Rhine Landtag. Collection of Essays. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Direct-Media, p. 136 (in Russian)

Nozdrachev A.F. (1968) Normativnye akty ministerstv i vedomstv SSSR: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Normative Acts of the Ministries and Departments of the USSR. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis Summary]. Moscow, p. 14.

Pigolkin A.S. (1962) Tolkovanie normativnykh aktov v SSSR [Interpretation of Normative Acts in the USSR]. Moscow: Gosyurizdat, 120 p. (in Russian)

Vlasenko N.A. (2007) Neopredelennost' kak pozitivnoe svoystvo prava [Uncertainty as a Positive Property of Law]. Sudebnoe pravoprimenenie: problemy teorii i praktiki: Sbornik statey [Judicial Enforcement: Issues of Theory and Practice. Collection of Essays]. Moscow: RGUP Press, p. 43 (in Russian)

Vlasenko N.A. (2015) Metodologicheskie osnovy issledovaniya konkretizatsii v prave [Methodological Bases of Study in Concretization in Law]. Konkretizatsiya prava: teoreticheskie iprakticheskie problémy... [Concretization of Law: Theoretical and Practical Issues...]. Ivanovo: University, pp. 71-72.

Voplenko N.N. (1976) Ofitsial'noe tolkovanie norm prava [Official Interpretation of Legal Norms]. Moscow: Juridicheskaya literatura, pp. 20-21 (in Russian)

Zaloilo M.V. (2011) Razvitie otechestvennoy yuridicheskoy mysli o konkretizatsii v prave [Development of National Legal Thought about Specification in Law]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no 6, pp. 41-49.

Zeyder N.B. (1966) Sudebnoe reshenie po grazhdanskomu delu [Judgment in Civil Matters]. Moscow: Juridicheskaya literatura, 92 p. (in Russian)

Published
2018-03-05
How to Cite
StepanovO. A. (2018). On Concretization of Law in Conditions of Digitalization of Public Practice. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (3), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2018.3.4.23
Section
Legal Thought: History and Modernity