Administrative Prejudice as a Special Legal Tool and Expanding its Use in the Criminal Code of Russia

  • Sergey A. Markuntsov National Research University Higher School of Economics
Keywords: administrative prejudice, criminal law prohibition, legal technique, corpus delicti, criminal law, administrative law

Abstract

The paper analyzes the increase in the number of criminal law prohibitions, constructed using administrative prejudice as a trend in the Russian Federation Criminal Code. Currently, the Special part of the Code contains nine articles with such prohibitions. According to the author, all the introduced criminal law prohibitions with administrative prejudice differ in their design features. The implementation of some of them causes serious difficulties in law enforcement practice. It is concluded that the use of administrative prejudice in the design of criminal law prohibitions should be scientifically substantiated. Besides, along with the practical problems of applying the relevant criminal law prohibitions, there is a problem of the administrative prejudice interpretation. In the doctrine of criminal law, some scholars in determining administrative prejudice attempt to create only the concepts of criminal law (sectoral) concepts, other scholars use mostly theoretical constructs. Defining administrative prejudice, scientists also interpret differently its legal nature and essence. Some of them see it as a phenomenon exclusively of law enforcement practice, others tract it primarily as a phenomenon of legal (legislative) techniques. Administrative prejudice is defined by the concept of prejudicially (legal) relationship, specific relationship, part of the process of proof, legal rule, a special way of verifying facts, a legal technique etc. From the point of view of author, the best solution is considering this legal phenomenon as a special means of legal techniques along with legal axioms, presumptions and fictions. This interpretation of administrative prejudice reflects its specificity in a narrow sectoral sense. Besides, this legal phenomenon can be defined in a broader sense, reflecting primarily its cross-sectoral nature of the position legal (criminal) policy. From the position of the approach, the scholars point out that administrative prejudice is a special relationship of criminal and administrative law, means of criminalization and decriminalization, means of preventing crimes, means of combating criminality, etc.

Author Biography

Sergey A. Markuntsov, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Associate Professor, Criminal Law and Criminalistics Department, Law Faculty, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Doctor of Juridical Sciences. Address: 20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow 101000, Russian Federation. E-mail: smarkuntsov@hse.ru

References

Alekseev S.S. (2010) Sobranie sochineniy. V 10 t. Tom 3: Problemy teorii prava: Kurs lektsiy [Collection of Works in 10 vols. Vol. 3. Problems of Legal Theory. Course of Lectures]. Moscow: Statut, 781 p. (in Russian)

Bezverhov A.G. (2012) «Administrativnaya preyuditsia» v ugolovnom zakonodatelstve Rossii: istoriko-pravovoianaliz [Administrative prejudice in Criminal Law of Russia: Historical and Legal Analysis]. Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: materialy IX Mezdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Moscow: Prospekt, pp. 140-147.

Boldyrev S.N. (2014) Yuridicheskaya tehnika: teoretiko-pravovoy analiz (Diss. Doktor Jurid. Nauk) [Legal Technique: Theoretical and Legal Analysis. Doctor of Juridical Sciences Dissertation]. Rostov-na-Donu, 468 p.

Gruntov I.O. (1985) Ugolovno-pravovye normy s administrativnoy preyuditsiey (Avtoref. diss. ...kand. jurid. nauk) [Norms of Criminal Law with Administrative Prejudice. Summary of Candidate of Juridical Sciences Dissertation]. Minsk, 22 p.

Esakov G.A. (2013) Ot administrativnyh pravonarusheniy k ugolovnym prostupkam, ili o suschestvovanii ugolovnogo prava v «shirokom» smysle [From Administrative Violations to Criminal Offenses, or Existence of Criminal Law in the Broad Sense]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal, no 1(6), pp. 37-45.

Kardanets A.V (2002) Preyuditsii v rossiiyskom prave. Problemy teorii i praktiki. (Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk) [Prejudice in Russian Law. Issues of Theory and Practice. Dissertation of Candidate of Juridical Sciences]. Nizhniy Novgorod, 181 p. (in Russian)

Kaufman M.A. (2015) Prestuplenie I administrativnoe pravonarushenie: voprosy identifikatsii [The Crime and Administrative Violations: Issues of Identification]. Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: materialy XII Mezdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Moscow: RG-Press, pp. 174-177.

Kozlov A.V. (2012) O dopustimosti administrativno-pravovoi preyuditsii v ugolovnom zakonodatelstve Rossii [Admissibility of Administrative Legal Prejudice in Russian Criminal Law of Russia]. Vestnik Dalnevostochnogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii, no 1(22), pp. 42-50.

Kuznetsova N.F. (2003) Prestuplenie I prestupnost. Izbrannye trudy [Crime and Criminality. Selected Works]. Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, pp. 400-531.

Malkov V.P. (2008) Administrativnaya I distsiplinarnaya preyuditsia kak sredstva dekriminalizatsii I kriminalizatsii v ugolovnom prave [Administrative and Disciplinary Prejudice as Means of Decriminalization and Criminalization in Criminal Law]. Probely v rossiiyskom zakonodatelstve, no 2, pp. 195198.

Mamedov E.F. (2015) Terminy I definitsii kak sredstva yuridicheskoy tehniki pravotvorchestva. (Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk) [Terms and Definitions as a Means of Legal Technique of Lawmaking. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Dissertation]. Irkutsk, 215 p.

Markuntsov S.A. (2015) Teoriya ugolovno-pravovyh zapretov. Monografiya [Theory of Criminal Law Prohibition. Monograph]. Moscow: Yurisprudentsiya, 560 p. (in Russian)

Mustafaev C.F. (1986) Administrativnaya preyuditsia v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. (Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk) [Administrative Prejudice in Soviet Criminal Law. Summary of Candidate of Juridical Sciences Dissertation]. Moscow, 25 p.

Pikurov N.I. (2016) Otraslevaiy spetsifika sovremennogo ugolovnogo prava Rossii. Aktualnye problemy ugolovnogo prava [Branch Specifics in Modern Russian Criminal Law. Issues in Criminal Law]. Moscow: Prospekt, pp. 9-33.

Sidorenko E.L. (2016) Administrativnaya preyuditsia v ugolovnom prave: problema pravoprimeneniya [Administrative Prejudice in Criminal Law: the Issue of Enforcement]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no 6, pp. 125-133.

Naumov A.V. (ed.) (1997) Slovar po ugolovnomu pravu [Dictionary of Criminal Law]. Moscow: BEK, 686 p. (in Russian)

Yamasheva E.V. (2009) K voprosu o vosstanovlenii institute administrativnoy preyuditsii v ugolovnom zakone Rossii. [Re the question on the restoration of the institution of administrative prejudice in criminal law of Russia]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no 10, pp. 69-79.

Published
2016-02-25
How to Cite
MarkuntsovS. A. (2016). Administrative Prejudice as a Special Legal Tool and Expanding its Use in the Criminal Code of Russia. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (4), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2016.4.31.42
Section
Legal Thought: History and Modernity