Human Rights Defence Institution and Resuming Criminal Case Due to New and Revealed Facts
Abstract
The article analyzes the human rights defence potential and resuming investigation due to new or revealed circumstances. The paper studies the essence of judicial examination as the most efficient way of rectifying judicial mistakes. In particular, with the resumption of legal proceedings- due to new circumstances, the court ensures not the compensation of judicial activity but a possibility to study the facts relevant to determine grounds and limits of criminal law security but could not be part of the investigation on the criminal case. The author argues that this mechanism can and should be used by default to eliminate violations but not when the possibilities to rectify them this sort of cases had been spent, the mechanism should not be deemed optional. Legal potential of the institution of resuming a case due to new or revealed circumstances is considered rather high. It has been determined by the types of judicial mistakes. Unlike the common view in Russian literature on legal proceedings, the author thinks that the procedural mechanism does not have anything exceptional. It is applied not after the possibility to review the case runs out but independently, i.e. as soon as new circumstances were disclosed. The potential of human rights defence is seen in the successive and more efficient procedures of eliciting judicial mistakes and authorize parties concerned with the right to appeal to a court to review the sentence or another judgement.
References
Avrutin Yu.E. (2012) Konstitualizatsiya pravovogo regulirovaniya deyatel’nosti rossiisoy politsii: aksiologicheskie i formal’no-yuridicheskie [Constitualisation of Legal Regulation of Russian Police: Axiological and Formal Legal], Vestnik Sankt-Petersburgskogo universiteta MVD — Herald of the Saint Petersburg University of the Russian Federation Internal Ministry, no 2, pp. 52-53.
Barak A. (1999) Sudeiskoe usmotrenie [Judicial Disposal], Moscow: Norma, pp. 28-30.
Grachyova Yu. V (2011) Sudeiskoe usmotrenie pri primenenii ugolovno-pravovykh norm: problemy i puti ikh resheniya [Judicial Disposal at Applying Criminal Law Norms: Problems and Solutions], Moscow, Prospect, 376 p.
Guk PA. (2008) Nezavisimosť i sudeiskoe usmotrenie [Independence and Judicial Disposal], Rossiyskaya justitsiya, no 11, pp. 46-48.
Khaidarov A.A. (2010) Predely sudebnogo usmotreniya v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse [Limits of Judicial Disposal in Russian Judicial Process], Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo institute MVD Rossii — Herald of Kazan Legal Institute, no 1, pp. 93-94.
Konyaev S.A. (2011) Moratoriy na primenenie smertnoy kazni v Rossii: Konstitutsionno-pravovoy aspect [Moratorium on Capital Punishment in Russia], Vestnik VGU — Herald of VGU, no 1, pp. 72-73.
Lozovskaya S.V. (2012) Sootnoshenie sudeiskogo usmotreniya i sudeiskogo pravotvorchestva [Balance of Judicial Disposal and Judicial Lawmaking], Rossiyskiy Sudiya — Russian Judge, no 5, pp. 25-30.
Markov P.A. (2011) Pravovaya priroda i usloviya sudebnogo usmotreniya [Legal Nature and Conditions of Legal Disposal], Pravo i politika — Law and Politics, no 11, pp. 18-76.
Mityukov M.A. (2001) Kak ispolnyayutsya resheniya Konstititsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoy Federatsii i kostititsionykh (ustavnykh) sudov subyektov Federatsii. [Implementation of the Decisions of the Russian Federation Constitutional Court], Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava — Journal of Russian Law, no 7, pp. 9-11.
Papkova O.A. (2005) Usmotrenie Suda [Disposal of Court], Moscow: Statut, pp. 10-12.
Savyuk L.K. (2011) Konstitualizatsiya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoy Federatsii [Constitutionalization of the Russian Federation Criminal Legislation]. Proceedings of the International Conference Noveyshie IT-tekhnologii [Latest IT-technologies] (July 1-3), pp. 173-174.
Stepchenko V.V (2008) Resheniya Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoy Federatsii. (Avtoref. diss. kand. jurid.nauk). [Decisions of the Russian Federation Constitutional Court. (PhD Thesis)]. Moscow.
Copyright (c) 2013 Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.