Structure of the Legal Liability System
Abstract
In this article the author relying mainly on the systematic method tried to solve the problem of the structure of the legal liability system. As a result, the author managed to formulate the concept of the structure of functional system in general, and the concept of the structure of the legal liability system in particular. The structure of the functional system was presented as a certain architecture of system created under the mechanism providing system communication between its structural elements (components) by means of the targeted useful result. This definition was projected on the definition of the structure of the legal liability system. The structure of the legal liability system appeared as a certain architecture of the legal liability system created under the mechanism providing system relations between the types of legal liability by means of the focused useful result formulated according to the state legal policy, for example, ensuring the level of offences corresponding to the optimum performance of the democratic constitutional social state. Secondly, the author specified the features of functional system, having designed them on the specific features of the structure of legal liability system. The basis of these specific features is made by the central organizing influence of the focused useful result of both functional system, and legal liability system respectively. Thirdly, proceeding from the concept of functional system structure in general, and structures of system of legal liability, in particular, and their specific features, the author specified structural elements (components) of the legal liability system. Giving preference to a branch criterion, as structural elements (components) of legal liability system, the following types of legal liability were specified: constitutional; criminal; administrative; civil legal; labor; financial; family and legal (as a forming type of legal liability); criminal and executive; constitutional and procedural (as a forming type of legal liability); criminal procedure; civil and procedural. Besides, an obligatory element of structure of the legal liability system is the focused useful result formulated according to the state legal policy — ensuring the level of offences corresponding to the optimum performance of the democratic constitutional social state.
References
Agapov A.B. (2001) Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' [Administrative Liability]. Moscow, Statut, 558 p.
Anokhin P.K. (1975) Ocherki po fiziologii funktsional'nykh sistem [Essays on the Physiology of Functional Systems]. Moscow, Meditsina, pp. 17-59.
Bertalanffy L. (1960) Problems of Life. N.Y., Harper&Row.
Blauberg I.V., Yudin E.G. (1973) Stanovlenie i sushchnost' sistemnogo podkhoda [Development and Essence of System Approach]. Moscow, Nauka, 271 p.
Bogdanov A.A. (1989) Tektologiya (Vseobshchaya organizatsionnaya nauka). V 2-kh kn.: kn. 1 [Tectology (General Science on Organizing) in Two Books. Book 1]. Moscow, Ekonomika.
Bytko Yu.I. (2004) Ugolovno-pravovaya otvetstvennost' [Criminal Law Liability]. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii: kurs lektsiy. V 6 t. / pod red. B.T. Razgil'dieva [Crininal Law of Russia. Course of Lectures in 6 Volumes. B.T. Razgil'diev (ed.)]. Saratov, Izd. GOU VPO «Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya akademiya prava», pp. 215-242.
Chervonyuk V.I. (2007) Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of State and Law]. Moscow, INFRA-M, 256 p.
Dukhno N.A., Ivakin V.I. (2000) Ponyatie i vidy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti [Concept and Types of Legal Liability]. Gosudarstvo i Pravo, no 6. pp. 12-18.
El'chaninov A.P., El'chaninova O.Yu. (2010) Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya otvetstvennost' kak vid yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti: k postanovke problemy [Penal Liability as a type of Legal Liability]. Vektor nauki Tol'yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki [Vector of Science of the Togliatti State University. Series: Legal Sciences], no 3 (3), pp. 69-71.
Emel'yanov A.S. (2001) Mery finansovo-pravovogo prinuzhdeniya [Measures of Financial Law Enforcement]. Pravovedenie, no 6. pp. 42-56.
Frolov I.T. (Ed.) (1991) Filosofskiy slovar' [Philosophic Dictionary]. Moscow, Politizdat, 719 p.
Karaseva M.V. (1999) Finansovoe pravo. Obshchaya chast' [Financial Law. General Part]. Moscow, Yurist, 304 p.
Khimicheva N.I. (Ed.) (2000) Finansovoe pravo [Financial Law]. Moscow, Yurist, 749 p.
Khasnutdinov R.R. (2012) Problemy metodologii sistemnogo podkhoda k yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti: monografiya [Issues of Methodology of System Approach to Legal Liability: Monograph]. Samara, Samarskiy yuridicheskiy institut FSIN Rossii, 110 p.
Khachaturov P.L., Lipinskiy D.A. (2007) Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti: monografiya [General Theory of Legal Liability. Monograph]. Saint Petersburg, Izdatel'stvo R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 950 p.
Knyazev S.D. (2005) Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost' v munitsipal'nom prave: voprosy teorii i praktiki [Constitutional Liability in Municipal Law: Questions of Theory and Practice]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava, no 6, pp. 81-88.
Korel'skii V.M., Perevalov V.D. (Eds.) (1998) Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of Law and State]. Moscow, Izdatel'skaya gruppa NORMA-INFRA, 616 p.
Kovalyunas D.A. (1998) O nekotorykh problemakh poryadka primeneniya administrativno-pravovykh sanktsiy [On some Problems of Applying Administrative Law Sanctions]. Vestnik VUiT. Ser. «Yurisprudentsiya», Vyp. 1. [Bulletin of VUiT. Series Law, issue 1]. Togliatti, pp. 33-39.
Kuzmicheva G.A., Kalinina L.A. (2000) Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' [Administrative Liability]. Moscow, Yurisprudentsiya, 464 p.
Lipinskiy D.A. (2012) Vidy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti i osobennosti ikh funktsionirovaniya [Types of Legal Liability and their Functioning]. Antologiya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti: v pyati tomakh [Anthology of Legal Liability in Five Volumes. R.L. Khachaturov (ed.)]. Volume 1. Samara, OOO «Izd. As. Gard», pp. 220-311.
Lipinskiy D.A. (2004) Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya otvetstvennost' — samostoyatel'nyy vid yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti? [Penal Liability — a new Legal Liability?]. Proceedings of International Conference: Problemy rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva: Istoriya i sovremennost'. Samara, Izd. Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii, pp. 22-23. (in Russian)
Pinigin V.A. (1998) Otvetstvennost' nalogoplatel'shchikov [Liability of Taxpayers]. Bukhgalterskiy Uchet, no 8. pp. 40-47.
Prokhorov A.M. (Ed.) (1982) Sovetskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' [Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1600 p.
Sadovskiy V.N. (1965) Metodologicheskie problemy issledovaniya ob”ektov, predstavlyayushchikh soboy sistemy [Methodological Issues of Research for Objects Representing Systems]. Sotsiologiya v SSSR [Sociology in the USSR]. Vol. 1. Moscow, Mysl', pp. 164-192.
Sadovskiy V.N. (1974) Osnovaniya obshchey teorii sistem [Fundamentals of the General Theory of Systems]. Moscow, Nauka, 279.
Sitdikov V.T. (2010) Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost': problemy teorii i praktiki [Constitutional Liability: Issues of Theory and Practice]. Proceedings of Russian Research Conference: Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' v publichno-pravovoy i chastnopravovoy sfere. November 20, 2009, Ufa, VEGU Academy, pp. 106-111.
Sviderskiy VI. (1962) O dialektike elementov i struktury v ob”ektivnom mire ipoznanii [On the Dialectics of Elements and Structure in Objective World and Cognition]. Moscow, Izd sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoy literatury.
Surmin Yu.P. (2003) Teoriya sistem i sistemnyy analiz [Theory of Systems and System Analysis]. Kiev: MAUP, 363 p.
Uemov A.I. (2004) L. Von Bertalanfi i parametricheskaya obshchaya teoriya sistem [von Bertalanffy and Parametric General Theory of Systems]. Sistemnyy podkhod v sovremennoy nauke [System Approach in Modern Science]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya, pp. 37-52.
Vitruk N.V. (2001) Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost': voprosy teorii i praktiki [Constitutional Liability: Questions of Theory and Practice]. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost': problemy Rossii, opyt zarubezhnykh stran. Nauchnoe izdanie / pod red. S.A. Avak'yana [Constitutional Law Liability: Issues of Russia, Foreign Experience. S.A. Avak'yan (ed.)]. Moscow, MSU, pp. 33-42.
Vitruk N.V. (2009) Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti [General Theory of Legal Liability]. Moscow, Norma, 432 p.
Yustus O.I. (1997) Finansovo-pravovaya otvetstvennosť nalogoplatel’shchikov-organizatsiy: dis.... kand. yurid. nauk [Fianancial Law Liability of Entities as Taxpayers (Summary of Doctoral Dissertation)]. Saratov.
Zimin A.V. (2001) Spetsifika nalogovoy otvetstvennosti rossiyskikh organizatsiy [Specifics of Tax Liability in Russian Organizations]. Pravovedenie, no 6. pp. 33-41.
Copyright (c) 2014 Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
