Mutual Impacts of International Investment Law and Law of the Sea under the BITs and ISDS cases: a Fundamental Analysis of EEZ, Contiguous Zone, and Continental Shelf
Аннотация
The opportunities and resources contained in the Exclusive Economic Zone, the Contiguous Zone, and the continental shelf attract foreign investors to invest in the waters, living and non-living resources separately. Investment in these zones is admissible to be regarded as an interdisciplinary issue, given its capacity to establish a nexus between three distinct branches of international law: namely, investment law, the law of the sea, and environmental law. The coexistence of these three branches of government engenders a complex environment for investment in these zones. The fundamental question posed in this study is: what are the key considerations in relation to successful investment in the Exclusive Economic Zone, contiguous zone and continental shelf, which should be taken into account at the outset? A comprehensive analysis of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Bilateral Investment Treaties, Investor-State Dispute Settlement cases and pertinent environmental regulations was conducted to ascertain the factors that contribute to a successful investment in these regions. The analysis concluded that a successful investor must consider four key aspects when contemplating investment in these zones. Firstly, the nature of the relevant zones must be taken into account. Secondly, investment permits must be based on the nature of the zones. Thirdly, the Exclusive Economic Zone, Contiguous Zone and continental shelf under Bilateral Investment Treaties must be considered. Finally, the establishment of peaceful coexistence is paramount. It is evident that an absence of consideration for each of the four aspects results in a challenge for the investment.
Литература
Chrysochou G. (2019) Offshore Energy Exploration Activities and the Exclusive Economic Zone Regime: A Case Study of the Eastern Mediterranean Basin. Malmo: World Maritime University, 142 p.
Chrysochou G., Siousiouras P. (2014) South-Eastern Mediterranean: The Case-Study of Geopolitics and Maritime Delimitation Issues. Global Journal of Human-Social Sciences, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 17–27.
Elferink A.G.O. (2013) Artificial Islands, Installations and Structures. In: Max Planck Encyclopaedia of International Law. Oxford: University Press, pp. 2–7.
Footer M. (2009) BITs and Pieces: Social and Environmental Protection in the Regulation of Foreign Investment. Michigan State International Law Review, vol. 18, p. 43.
Friedman S. (2020) The Concept of Entitlement to an Exclusive Economic Zone as Reflected in International Judicial Decisions. Israel Law Review, vol. 53, issue 1, pp. 101–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223719000190
Gill P., Stewart K. et al. (2008) Methods of Data Collection in Qualitative Research:. Interviews and Focus Groups, vol. 204, no. 6, p. 291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192
Gianopolos N. (2020) International Law and Offshore Energy Production. Utrecht University Paper, p. 52.
Hannesson R. (2008) The Exclusive Economic Zone and Economic Development in the Pacific Island Countries. Marine Policy, vol. 32, issue 6, pp. 886–897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.01.002
Hossein E. (2022) The Conflict Between the Establishment and Operation of Offshore Installations, Navigation and other Uses of the Sea in International Law. International Energy Law and Taxation Review, January, p. 296.
Karavias M. (2018) Submarine Cables and Pipelines: The Protection of Investors Under International Law. Journal of World Investment and Trade, vol. 19, pp. 860–889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340113
Kum S.N. (2020) Maritime Zones (Contiguous Zone) Regulations. International Maritime Law Institute. PhD Thesis. Msida (Malta), pp. 6, 19–20.
Patuzi P. (2015) The Concept of the Economic Exclusive Zone. Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 150.
Scheiber H.N., Kraska J. et al. (2015) Offshore Energy: Troubled Waters in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. In: Science, Technology and New Challenges to Ocean Law. Leiden: Brill, p. 254.
Tanaka Y. (2015) The International Law of the Sea. Cambridge: University Press, p. 123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139946261
Trevisanut S. (2014) Foreign Investments in the Offshore Energy Industry: Investment Protection v. Energy Security v. Protection of the Marine Environment. London: Routledge, pp. 247–248.
Trevisanut S., Giannopoulos N. (2018) Investment Protection in Offshore Energy Production: Bright Sides of Regime Interaction. Journal of World Investment & Trade, vol. 19, p. 806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340111
Vadi V. (2023) Cultural Heritage and International Economic Law. Leiden: Brill, p. 156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004347823
Ziskind J. (1973) International Law and Ancient Sources: Grotius and Selden. The Review of Politics, vol. 35, issue 4, pp. 537–559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500033313
Copyright (c) 2025 Abadikhan M.

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-ShareAlike» («Атрибуция — На тех же условиях») 4.0 Всемирная.












