The Future of Human Rights Law

  • T.A.O. Endicott Law Oxford University
Keywords: human rights, human rights adjudication, proportionality, European Convention on Human Rights, United Kingdom Human Rights Act 1998

Abstract

Justiciable charters of rights give courts a dynamic and controversial role in governance, which is in tension with the roles of the executive and the legislature. In this essay I comment, from the British point of view, on the way in which these tensions work out in the law of the European Convention on Human Rights. I argue that politicians need to accept that the tension between the role of the courts and the roles of the executive and the legislature will be permanent, and is not a reason for withdrawing from the Convention, or for ignoring the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights.

Author Biography

T.A.O. Endicott, Law Oxford University

Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Law Oxford University

Published
2012-02-08
How to Cite
EndicottT. (2012). The Future of Human Rights Law. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (5), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2012.5.4.11
Section
British and Russian Constitutional Law