Soviet Family and Demographic Policy in Landmarks of Law in Great Patriotic War Period

Keywords: demographic policy, large families, fatherlessness, cognitive history, glorification; vital and biosocial needs, glorification, vital and biosocial needs, need for self-development

Abstract

The appeal to the experience of the Soviet Union in solving the demographic problem that arose during the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945 due to the latest decisions of the Russian state: the approving the Fundamentals of State Policy for the Preservation and Strengthening of Traditional Russian Spiritual and Moral Values, the restoration of the title “Mother Heroine” in the award system, the announcement of the Year of the Family. The purpose of the work is to assess the impact on society of legislative decisions taken to improve the demographic situation during the Great Patriotic War, from the standpoint of modern academic ideas about human needs. The objectives of the study are: description and characterization of new legal measures in the field of demography, establishing the impact of legislative decisions on family values in order to determine the prospects for their use at the present stage. The authors implement historical-legal, formal-dogmatic, statistical and comparative research methods. The measures taken to stimulate the birth rate are analyzed: a tax on childlessness; financial material support for families with many children and single mothers, the abolition of the right to claim to establish paternity; complicating the divorce procedure; moral encouragement of motherhood. It is concluded that the demographic policy was aimed at stimulating reproductive behavior by playing on the vital and role needs of a person. The issue of illegitimate pregnancy and the birth of an illegitimate child has become a problem for women and society as a whole, but not for the biological father. The developed legal strategy was an alternative to the legalization of polygamy and stimulated the plurality of actual family relationships. The need for self-development, the value of personal transfer of father’s experience to children within the framework of the chosen strategy turned out to be almost impossible to take into account. Soviet procreation policies can hardly be called familial one: the prohibition of paternity suit and other legal measures encouraged reproductive behavior, leading to an increase in the number of single-parent families and the placement of children in child care institutions. The change in public morality — the manifestation of tolerance towards men who are indifferent to the fate of their offspring, which led to the aggravation of the question of fatherlessness — was a “side effect” of the radical novelization of family law and changes in the norms on the social security of citizens.

Author Biographies

Vladimir Boldyrev, Russian State University of Justice, North-Western Branch

Doctor of Sciences (Law), Professor

Denis Karkhalev, Siberian Federal University

Doctor of Sciences (Law), Professor

References

Asadova O.H. (2023) The Second World War in the Uzbekistan SSR: Changes in Tax over the Years. Frontline social sciences and history journal, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 44–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/social-fsshj-03-04-07

Bebneva T.N., Raevskaya O.A., Konstantinova B.S. (2020) Contraceptive Policy in Solving Demographic Problems. Status Praesens. Ginekologiya, akusherstvo, besplodnyj brak=Status Praesens. Gynecology, Obstetrics, Infertile Marriage, no. 6, pp. 24–33 (in Russ.)

Bernhardt P., Holtzblatt J. (2008) Low-income Childless Individuals and the Tax and Transfer Systems. In: 101st Annual conference on taxation papers. Washington: National Tax Association Proceedings, pp. 1111–1116.

Dubynin V.A. (2022) The Brain and its Needs: From Nutrition to Acknowledgment. Moscow: Alpina, 572 p. (in Russ.)

Ikuta M., Pushkareva N.L. (2019) Soviet Women and Japanese Internees: an Analysis of Everyday Practices in the Perspective of Gender History (1945-1956). Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Istoriya=Bulletin of Perm University. History, no. 3, pp. 51–66 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2019-3-51-66

Isupov V.A. (2015) The Birth Rate in Russia in 1939–1945. Rossijskaya istoriya= Russian History, no. 1, pp. 3–18 (in Russ.)

Karner S. (2021) On the Issue of Soviet Citizens’ Rationale Behind the Decision to Remain in Austria after World War II. Istoricheskij kur’er=Historical Courier, no. 3, pp. 173–179 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31518/2618-9100-2021-3-19

Komissarova E.G. (2021) Relations on Actual Upbringing of a Child: Familyand Legal Institutionalization. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki=Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 130–153 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2021.1.130.153

Kornilov G.E. (2021) The Impact of the Great Patriotic War on Population Reproduction (On the materials of the Molotov Region). Novejshaya istoriya Rossii=Contemporary History of Russia, no. 2, pp. 339–355 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu24.2021.203

Krinko E.F., Suschiy S.Ya. (2020) The Demographic Processes in the South of the RSFSR during the Great Patriotic War. Novejshaya istoriya Rossii=Contemporary History of Russia, no. 4, pp. 844–863 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu24.2020.402

Liang H. (2019) Demographic Crisis in Russia: Historical Aspect. Mir russko govoryashchih stran=World of Russian-speaking Countries, no. 2, pp. 33–43 (in Russ.)

Medushevskaya O.M. (2004) Comparative Studies in Sources and Educational Model of Humanitarian Knowledge. Novyi istoricheskii vestnik=New Historical Bulletin, no. 1, pp. 5–8 (in Russ.)

Pathak M. (2021) Warrior’s Mothers: Narratives of Women from the United Liberation Front of Assam. Journal of International Women’s Studies, no. 9, pp. 271–282.

Romanov R.E. (2019) Passive Protest of Working Youth of Novosibirsk Region during the Great Patriotic War (“letters to the powers”). Istoricheskij kur’er=Historical Courier, no. 5, pp. 138–146 (in Russ.)

Rossman E. (2022) Mobilizing Single Mothers: Demographic Policy in the Postwar USSR. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review, no. 2, pp. 119–122 (in Russ.)

Rostovskaya T.K., Vasilieva E.N. et al. (2021) The Family Demographic Policy in the Context of Population Reproduction: the Country-specific Review. Problemy socialnoi gigieny, zdravookhranenia i istorii meditcini=Issues of Social Hygiene, Health Care and History of Medicine, no. 5, pp. 1111–1116 (in Russ.)

Sarkar S. (2020) «Working for/from Home»: an Interdisciplinary Understanding of Mothers in India. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, no. 5, pp. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n5.rioc1s26n6

Schulz M. (2021) German Family Policy in the Context of Solving Demographic Issues. Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya=Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Management, no. 1, pp. 4–11 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/1682-2358-2021-1-4-11

Simonov P.V. (2023) Motivated Brain. Higher Nervous Activity and Natural Academic Foundations of General Psychology. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 288 p. (in Russ.)

Somov V.A., Volkova E.S. (2022) Soviet Mentality: Markers of Socio-Historical Identity. Novejshaya istoriya Rossii=Modern History of Russia, no. 4, pp. 339–355 (in Russ.)

Tarusina N.N. (2022) Single Motherhood as a Social and Legal Phenomenon. Zhurnal rossyjskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, no. 7, pp. 68–84 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2022.073

Tsvetanova M. (2022) Tax for Unmarried and Childless Persons (Bachelor Tax) in Historical Perspective and Possibilities for its Establishment in Modern Times. Yuridichesko spisanie na NBU=Legal Magazine of the NBU, no. 2, pp. 104–120 (in Bulgarian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.33919/ljnbu.22.2.8

Ulianova M.V. (2022) Limits of the Exercise of Family Rights. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta, Juridicheskie nauki=Bulletin of Perm University. Legal Sciences, no. 5, pp. 658–682 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-658-682

Wudarski A., Ulianova M.V. (2022) The Legal Status of the Biological Father in the Case of Multiple Paternity: A European Comparative Analysis. Russkiy zakon=Lex Russica, no. 1, pp. 147–163 (in Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.182.1.147–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.182.1.147-163

Zamaraeva Z.P., Novoselov V.M. (2012) Specifics of Fatherhood Transformation during the Soviet Period. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya=Theory and Practice of Social Development, no. 6, pp. 53–56 (in Russ.)

Zhuravleva O.O. (2021) Tax and Legal Measures to Support Families. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, no. 5, pp. 92–105 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2021.063

Zykov S.V. (2020) Implementing Rights of Fatherhood in Modern Russia. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki=Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, no. 3, pp. 44–71 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2020.3.44.71

Published
2024-09-04
How to Cite
BoldyrevV., & KarkhalevD. (2024). Soviet Family and Demographic Policy in Landmarks of Law in Great Patriotic War Period. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 17(3), 162-179. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2024.3.162.179
Section
Russian law: conditions, perspectives, commentaries