Splitting of Contractual Statute In Standard Master Agreements in the Over-the-Counter Derivatives Market

Keywords: derivative, conflict of laws, standard documentation, single agreement, splitting of the statute, depecage, governing law, financial collateral

Abstract

The article considers the splitting of the law governing clause as a phenomenon to a certain extent spread in international private law based on the example of standard documentation for derivatives (derivative financial instruments) elaborated by International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) and other industry organizations including the European Banking Federation (EBF) and Foreign Exchange Committee (FXC). The said documentation is complex in character and is comprised of various elements including the master agreement, schedule thereto, confirmations and credit support annexes (deeds) addressing the transfers of financial collateral. These elements of documentation comprise the single contractual arrangement between the parties by virtue of the single agreement principle. The law applicable to the master agreement and therefore to the single agreement as a whole is determined in the While using the standard documentation two basic scenarios are possible. However, whenever the credit support annexes (deeds) are used the parties may invoke depecage as the law applicable to these instruments may be different from the law chosen with respect to the single agreement. In line with the prevailing approach to the said phenomenon in the legal doctrine and the main sources of private international law, depecage is acceptable on the condition that no discrepancies arise, especially in case when two distinct legal systems are applied to the same issue. At first glance, payments under derivative transactions and credit support instrument are separated from one another, although in the presence of an event of default and subsequent early termination of transactions under a master agreement contradictions may theoretically arise. To overcome the contradictions the parties to those contracts are recommended to advise legal opinions on the issues of netting and collateral available to the members of ISDA, EBF and FXC.

Author Biographies

Aleksey Klementyev, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Assistant Professor

Aleksandra Kasatkina, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Assistant Professor

References

Asoskov A.V. (2017) Conflict of Laws Regulation of Contractual Obligations. Moscow: M-Logos, 640 p. (in Russ.)

Aubart A. (2013) Die Behandlung der dépeçage im europäischen Internationalen Privatrecht. Berlin: Mohr Siebeck, 248 S.

Azoulay K. (2021) Lex contractus or lex arbitri? The UK Supreme Court sets the rules on the law applicable to the arbitration agreement: Enka v Chubb [2020] UKSC 38. Civil Justice Quarterly, no. 3, pp. 176-188.

Basedow J. (2009) Handworterbuch des Europaischen Privatrechts: Bd.1: Abschlussprufer-Kartellverfahrensrecht (A-Kar). Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck, 964 S.

Benjamin J. (2007) Financial Law. Oxford: University Press, 654 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199282937.001.0001

Benzler M. (1999) Nettingvereinbarungen im Auserborglichen derivatehandel Nomosverlagsgesellschaft. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 409 S.

D' Hollander J. (1996) L'émergence des produits dérivés: le cas du Québec. Les Cahiers de droit, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 377-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/043391ar

Fuchs F. (2013) Close-out Netting, Collateral und systemisches Risiko: Rechtsansätze zur Minderung der Systemgefahr im außerbörslichen Derivatehandel. Berlin: Mohr Siebeck. 437 S.

Gullifer L. (2021) Interpretation of Market Standard Form Contracts. Journal of Business Law, no. 3, pp. 227-245.

Hook M. (2016) The Choice of Law Contract. Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing, 255 p.

Lutkova O.V. (2016) The Splitting of Statute in International Private Law. Zhurnal rossyiskogo prava=Russian Law Journal, no. 4, pp. 133-142 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/18701

Majorina M.V. (2012) The Choice of Law with Respect to Mixed and Innominate Contracts. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, no. 10, pp. 72-81 (in Russ.)

Novikova T.V. (2020) The Formulation of the Agreement on the Applicable Law in Context of Depecage Admissability. Jurist=The Lawyer, no. 5, pp. 18-22 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3929-2020-5-18-22

Paech Ph. (2014) Close-Out Netting, Insolvency Law and Conflict-of-Laws. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 419-452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5235/14735970.14.2.419

Parker E., McGarry A. (2009) The ISDA Master Agreement and CSA: close-out weaknesses exposed in the banking crisis and suggestions for change. Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Finance Law, no. 1, pp. 16-19.

Rogerson P., Collier J. (2013) Collier's Conflict of Laws. Cambridge: University Press, 514 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139048798

Van Galster G. (2016) European Private International Law. Portland: Hart, 576 p.

Werner P. (2012) Close-out Netting and the World of Derivatives in Central and Eastern Europe and beyond — ISDA's Perspective. In: Law in Transition. Developing Capital Markets. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, pp. 48-55.

Wood Ph. (1995) Title Finance, Derivatives, Securitizations and Netting. Law and Practice of International Finance. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 251 p.

Published
2025-04-01
How to Cite
KlementyevA., & KasatkinaA. (2025). Splitting of Contractual Statute In Standard Master Agreements in the Over-the-Counter Derivatives Market. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 18(1), 165-190. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2025.1.165.190