Conceptualization of Exclusive Copyright Content

Keywords: intellectual rights, exclusive copyright, moral rights, substantive copyright, author, creativity, content

Abstract

The historical, philosophical, social foundations of exclusive copyright in terms of its content are explored. The prerequisites for the formation of this institute are outlined. Copyright in Rus’ began with state printing houses created by Ivan IV to control the impeccability of biblical texts and counteract their malicious distortion by supporters of Uniatism, thus provoking popular unrest. Peter I Great pursued the same policy. Hence the censorship and censorship regulations and the well-known theory of the normative prehistory of the institution. Western European copyright law, at the stage of its formalization, served the interests of capital, and the system of rules representing the prototype of Russian copyright law, protected spirituality and statehood. The generally accepted history of copyright is critically analyzed. Versions of the origin of this (young, as is commonly believed) institution vary over several centuries. This discrepancy indicates a lack of an objective historical approach and prevents a comprehensive qualification. The struggle for ownership of the results of creativity, on the one hand, and against the monopoly of the copyright holder (state of appropriation), on the other, is qualified in the study as the main source of development of the content of exclusive copyright. From the point of functional analysis it seems promising to clarify the characteristics of the content of exclusive copyright and compare it with such related categories as the concept, structure, and system of exclusive copyright. Differences between the noted protective correlates are sometimes ignored in the modern doctrine of intellectual rights. An imperfect change of emphasis is emphasized: the category of content in the latest research is replaced by the category of the structure of exclusive rights. A conclusion is made about the need to develop a comprehensive concept of the content of exclusive copyright and approaches to its definition are outlined. The semantic meaning of the content of exclusive copyright is expressed in a legally established list of absolute property rights (the scope of subjective rights) to a work and in a system of methods for the economic exploitation of a given intellectual product that correlates with that list.

Author Biography

Dmitriy Bratus, Ural State Law University

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor

References

Alekseev S.S. (2006) Intellectual property rights. Ekaterinburg: University, 120 p. (in Russ.)

Alferov A.L. (2001) From the history of copyright in Russia. Pravo i politika=Law and Politics, no. 9, pp. 122-130 (in Russ.)

Bakhtiarov A. (1895) Ivan Fedorov. The first Russian book printer: a historical essay. Saint Petersburg: Evdokimov, 31 p. (in Russ.)

Bakuntsev A.V. Copyright for works of literature in the Russian Empire. Laws, regulations, international treaties (1827-1917). Moscow: VK Publishers, 2006. 91 p. (in Russ.)

Berdyaev N.A. (2018) The meaning of creativity. Moscow: AST, 416 p. (in Russ.)

Bulwer-Lytton E. (1988) The last days of Pompeii. Pelham, or the adventures of a gentleman. Moscow: Pravda, 768 p. (in Russ.)

Chertanov M. (2013) Darwin. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya, 407 p. (in Russ.)

Cicero M.T. (2016) About the state. About laws. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proyekt, 249 p. (in Russ.)

Dozortsev V.A. (2003) Intellectual rights. Concept. System. Codification. Moscow: Statut, 416 p. (in Russ.)

Engels F. (1966) Letter to V. Borgius. In: Marx K., Engels F. Works. Vol. 39. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury, pp. 174 — 177 (in Russ.)

Fromm E. (2014) To have or to be? Moscow: AST, 320 p. (in Russ.)

Gavrilov E.P. (2016) Intellectual property rights. Copyright and adjacent rights. 21th century. Moscow: Yurservitum, 878 p. (in Russ.)

Gongalo B.M. (2021) Subject of civil law. Selected works. Vol. 2. Moscow: Statut, 720 p. (in Russ.)

Gordon M.V. (1955) The Soviet copyright. Moscow: Gosyurizdat, 232 p. (in Russ.)

Gribanov V.P. (1994) The right to protection as a subjective civil right. In: Civil law. E.A. Sukhanov (ed.). Moscow: BEK, 384 p. (in Russ.)

Halfina R.O. (1974) General doctrine of legal relations. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 351 p. (in Russ.).

Hegel G.V.F. (2007) Philosophy of law. Moscow: Mir knigi, 464 p. (in Russ.)

Ioffe O.S. (2000) Legal relations under Soviet civil law. Selected works. Moscow: Statut, 782 p. (in Russ.)

Jonas V.Ya. (1963) Criterion of creativity in copyright law and practice. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 138 p. (in Russ.)

Kantorovich Ya.A. (1916) Copyright in literary, musical, artistic and photographic works. Petrograd: Brockhaus-Efron, 792 p. (in Russ.)

Kashanin A.V. (2010) Development of views on the relationship between the personal non-property and property rights in the doctrine of copyright. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika=Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice, no. 7, pp. 88-99 (in Russ.)

Kheifets I.Ya. (1931) Copyright. Moscow: Sovetskoye zakonodatel'stvo, 220 p. (in Russ.)

Krasavchikov O.A. (2017) Legal facts in Soviet civil law. Selected works. Moscow: Statut. Vol. 1, 492 p., vol. 2, 494 p. (in Russ.)

Liptsik D. (2002) Copyright and related rights. Moscow: Ladomir, 794 p. (in Russ.)

Makovsky A.L. (2008) Exclusive right (article 1229). In: Commentary on part four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Statut, 715 p. (in Russ.)

Makovsky A.L. (2010) On the codification of civil law (1922-2006). Moscow: Statut, 736 p. (in Russ.)

Makovsky A.L. (2018) Article 1229. Exclusive right. In: Commentary on part four of the Civil Code. E.A. Pavlova (ed.). Moscow: Research Center for Private Law, 928 p. (in Russ.)

Mamardashvili M. (2019) Vilnius lectures on social philosophy: experience in physical metaphysics. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka, 320 p. (in Russ.)

Mangel A. (2020) History of reading. Saint Petersburg: Limbach Publishers, 432 p. (in Russ.)

Melnikov V. (2010) Violation of copyright in photographs in the European Convention on Human Rights. Intellektualnaya sobstvennost. Avtorskie i smezhnye prava=Intellectual Property. Copyright and Adjacent Rights, no. 1, pp. 25-32 (in Russ.)

Mikheeva L.Yu. (2019) Modernization of the institution of intangible benefits: achievements and prospects. In: Codification of Russian private law. D.A. Medvedev (ed.). Moscow: Statut, 492 p. (in Russ.)

Murzin D.V. (2017) Concept, history and sources of copyright. In: Intellectual property rights. Vol. 2. Copyright. Moscow: Statut, 367 p. (in Russ.)

Murzin D.V. (2023) General provisions on intellectual rights. In: Civil law. B.M. Gongalo (ed.). Vol. 1. Moscow: Statut, 622 p. (in Russ.)

Nazarov A.G. (2017) Limits of exercise of the exclusive right to the results of intellectual activity. Moscow: Prospekt, 184 p. (in Russ.)

Ovsyannikov M.F. (1983) A brief dictionary of aesthetics. Moscow: Prosvesh-cheniye, 223 p. (in Russ.)

Pavlova E.A. (2009) Exclusive rights (intellectual property). In: Civil law. Vol. II. Moscow: INFRA-M, 608 p. (in Russ)

Pilenko A.A. (1894) International literary conventions. Saint Petersburg: Navy Ministry, 555 p. (in Russ.)

Scherbak N.V. (2022) Copyright and neighbouring rights in the system of intellectual rights. Doctor of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Moscow, 509 p. (in Russ.)

Sergeenko M.E. (1983) Notes. In: Plinyi Junior Letters. Moscow: Nauka, 408 p. (in Russ.)

Shershenevich G.F. (1891) Copyright for literary works. Kazan: University, 314 p. (in Russ.)

Shershenevich G.F. (2001) Civil law course. Tula: Avtograf, 720 p. (in Russ.)

Soloviev V.S. (2007) Hegel. In: Hegel G. Philosophy of law. Moscow: Mir knigi, 464 p. (in Russ.)

Spiridonova N.B. (2022) Structure of exclusive copyright. Zhurnal suda po in-tellektualnym pravam=Journal of the Intellectual Rights Court, no. 2, pp. 5-20 (in Russ.)

Sukhanov E.A. (2007) Codification of legislation on intellectual property. In: Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Part Four: Commentary. Text. Moscow: Statut, 352 p. (in Russ.)

Sviridova E.A. (2019) Concept and content of copyright. In:. Intellectual property: artistic property. G.F. Ruchkina (ed.). Moscow: Infra-M, 231 p. (in Russ.)

Tabaeva Z. (2014) All hope is for the poet! Business Kazakhstan, no. 18, p. 11 (in Russ.)

Tolstoy Yu.K. (2013) From my experience. Moscow: Prospekt, 400 p. (in Russ.)

Vasari G. (2020) Great artists: selected biographies. Moscow: AST, 544 p. (in Russ.)

Vasiliev A.S. (2017) Copyright. In: Commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. S.A. Stepanov (ed.). Moscow: Prospekt; Ekaterinburg: Institute of Private Law, 1648 p. (in Russ.)

Vasilyev A.S., Lisachenko A.V., Murzin D.V. (2020) Legal protection of scholar activity results. Ekaterinburg: Autograph, 338 p. (in Russ.)

Voskoboynikov O. (2023) 16 essays on the history of art. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 472 p. (in Russ.)

Published
2024-06-06
How to Cite
BratusD. (2024). Conceptualization of Exclusive Copyright Content. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 17(2), 114-143. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2024.2.114.142
Section
Russian Law: Condition, Perspectives, Commentaries