Issues in Definition of Public Domain in Modern Information Society

  • Vitaly O. Kalyatin National Research University Higher School of Economics
Keywords: intellectual property, copyright, patent law, public domain, term of protection, folklore, traditional knowledge, access to works, territory of law application, international regulation

Abstract

The article is devoted to determining the area of public domain and problematic issues of its application. In theory, legal regime of public domain provides modern society with a wide range of opportunities of intellectual property use, however, regulation of this regime and even its definition may differ from country to country, which creates legal uncertainty. The well-known principle idea/expression dichotomy which declares that all ideas should be free to use, may show the sphere of public domain in general, but it does not permit to determine the area of this regime precisely. In the narrow sense, public domain is a specific regime for situations where existing exclusive right to work expired or ceased to exist on any reason. In this case, we have a specific legal regulation rather than absence of legal regulation at all. This may provide a public control for use of intellectual property and, at the same time, avoid monopolization. However, practical application of the public domain regime is limited by a number of factors, in particular, limited access to the object, existence of protecting elements inside the work, specific technical conditions of its use, territorial limitation of exclusive right, etc. In order to provide effective use of the global humankind heritage, these factors should be reflected in legal documents at the international level. Unfortunately, currently there is clear shortage of international regulation of the public domain regime. National legislation (including the Russian one) as a rule does not provide necessary legal support either. As a result, society may not obtain proper access to results of creative activity of its members.

Author Biography

Vitaly O. Kalyatin, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Senior Fellow, Information Law Laboratory, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Professor, S.S. Alexeev Research Centre of Private Law under President of Russia, Candidate of Juridical Sciences. Address: 20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000, Russia. E-mail: kalvit@yandex.ru

References

Amangel'dy A.A. (2015) Zakonodatel'stvo Respubliki Kazakhstan ob intellektual'noy sobstvennosti. Postateynyy nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy [Legislation on Intellectual Property in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Commentary]. Almaty: Pravovaya Reforma Press, 867 p.

Boyle J. (2010) The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press, 336 p.

Colin C. (2010) Registers, Databases and Orphan Works / Copyright and Cultural Heritage. Preservation and Access to Works in a Digital World. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 28-50.

Copyright and the Value of the Public Domain: an Empirical Assessment. Newport: Intellectual Property Office, 2015. Available at: https://shorturl.at/T5Xd4 (accessed: April 18, 2016)

Deazley R. (2006) Rethinking Copyright History, Theory, Language. Northampton: Edward Elgar, 201 p.

Dyusol'e S. (2011) Obzornoe issledovanie po avtorskomu pravu i smezhnym pravam i obshchestvennomu dostoyaniyu. VOIS, Komitet po razvitiyu i intellektual'noy sobstvennosti [Review on Copyright and Public Domain. WIPO, Committee on Developing Intellectual Property], p. 7. Available at: //http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/ru/cdip_7/cdip_7_inf_2.pdf (accessed: April 18, 2016)

Harris J. (1996) Property and Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 416 p.

Kalyatin V.O. (2015) Funktsii rezhima obshchestvennogo dostoyaniya v sovremennom informatsionnom obshchestve [Instruments of Public Domain in Modern Information Society]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, no 4, p. 4-16.

Lange D. (1981) Recognizing Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 44, no 4, pp. 147181.

Losev S.S. (2014) Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Zakonu Respubliki Belarus' «O patentakh na izobreteniya, poleznye modeli i promyshlennye obraztsy» [Commentary to the Belarus Law On Invention Patents, Useful Models and Industrial Patterns]. Minsk: Institut Radiologii, 458 p.

Matsuura K. (2004) UNESCO's Approach to Open-Access and Public-Domain Information. Open Access and Public Domain in Digital Data and Information for Science. Proceedings of Symposium. Washington: National Academies Press, pp. 7-9.

Pessach G. (2008) Networked Memory Institutions: Social Remembering, Privatization and its Discontents. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, no 26, pp. 71-149.

Rahmatian A. (2010) Copyright Protection for the Restoration, Reconstruction and Digitization of Public Domain Works. Copyright and Cultural Heritage. Preservation and Access to Works in a Digital World. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 51-76.

Riley M. (ed.) (2004) Indigenous Intellectual Property Rights: Legal Obstacles and Innovative Solutions. Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press, 393 p.

Samuelson P. (2003) Digital Information, Digital Networks, and the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 66, pp. 80-107.

Published
2016-02-23
How to Cite
KalyatinV. O. (2016). Issues in Definition of Public Domain in Modern Information Society. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2016.2.4.14.
Section
Russian Law: Condition, Perspectives, Commentaries