Efficiency of Legal Protection for Intellectual Property Rights: Administrative Barriers
Abstract
The aim for elimination of administrative burdens in order to develop science and technology, to increase the efficiency of legal regulations in intellectual property sphere is imposed in leading documents for transformation and modernization of the Russian economy. In this case analysis of different elements of the governmental regulations, difficulties signification for its proper administrating are of a significant importance. The purpose of the research is to determine what an administrative burden is to form-up the ways of its overruling on order to develop the intellectual property sphere, to determine the functions and structure of the administrative bodies, to expose legal and regulative gaps as a fundamental guideline for optimization of the scientific and technologic development. Methods used are: dialectical and formal logic, functional and other general scholar methods; specific research methods, in particular legal dogmatic method, were applied too. The results include characteristics of administrative burdens, the meaning is defined narrowly and generally; the ways of overruling are determined at different levels: strategic, scheduled and current. The main aims and purposes for better statutory administration of the IP sphere are proposed. Conclusions: the paper revealed that the strategic aims and principles are not settled down in major documents for current regulations. The absence of the main, single administrative body — “megauthority” — in the intellectual property sphere leads to the decrease in the governmental regulations and to uprising of the burdens for the science and technical development. At the level of particular administrative burdens, some blocking legal mechanisms for registration of intellectual property rights and their protection have been identified, in particular in the field of pharmacology.
References
Agamagomedova S.A. (2017) Administrativnye bar'ery pri prokhozhdenii tamozhennogo kontrolya: ponyatie, vidy i sposoby preodoleniya [Administrative barriers in customs control: concept, types and solutions]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no 6, pp. 79-88.
Anawalt H. (2003) International Intellectual Property, Progress, and the Rule of Law. Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, vol. 19, issue 2, pp. 383-405.
Bermudez J., Oliveira M. (eds.) (2004) Intellectual Property in the Context of the WTO TRIPS Agreement: challenges for public health. Rio de Janeiro: Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, 170 p.
Evstaf'ev V., Orekhov D., Khitrova L. (2017) Problemy upravleniya pravami Rossiyskoy Federatsii na rezul'taty intellektual'noy deyatel'nosti [Issues of administrating the rights of the Russian Federation and the results of intellectual activity]. Promyshlennaya sobstvennost', no 1, pp. 17-22.
Fabrichnyi S.Yu., Ruzakova O.A. (2017) Kommercializacia intellektualnoi sobstvennosti: problemy regulirovania. Patenty i licenzii, no 7, pp. 41-48.
Ivanov A. Yu. (2017) Prinuditel'noe litsenzirovanie dlya innovatsionnogo razvitiya: o neobkhodimosti balansirovki rezhima intellektual'nykh prav [Involuntary licensing of innovative development: on balancing the regime of intellectual rights]. Zakon, no 5, pp. 78-93.
Ivliev G.P. (2017) Printsip dobrosovestnosti v deyatel'nosti Federal'noy sluzhby po intellektual'noy sobstvennosti [The principle of good faith in the activity of the Federal Intellectual Property Service]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava, no 2, pp. 56-62.
Kalyatin V.O. (2018) Razvitie sistemy ewgulirovania rasporyazhenia pravami na intellektualnyu sobstvennost v Rossii [Development of regulating direction of intellectual property rights in Russia]. Imyschestvennye otnoshenia v Rossiyskoi Federatcii, no 2, pp. 54-63.
Minbaleev A.V. (2016) Sistema gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v sfere intellektual'noy sobstvennosti [The system of state administration in intellectual property]. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya «Pravo», no 3, pp. 112-115.
Naryshkin S.E., Khabrieva T.Ya. (2006) Administrativnaya reforma v Rossii: nekotorye itogi i zadachi yuridicheskoy nauki [Administrative reform in Russia: preliminary results and objectives of legal science]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no 11, p. 9.
Nozdrachev A.F. (2011) Sistemnaya reglamentatsiya administrativnoy deyatel'nosti: otechestvennaya doktrina i praktika [System regulation of administrative activity: Russian doctrine and practice]. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika, no 8, pp. 5-41.
Ruzakova O.A., Grin' E.S. (2017) Primenenie tekhnologii Blockchain k sistematizatsii rezul'tatov intellektual'noy deyatel'nosti [Blockchain in Systematizing the results of intellectual property activity]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki, no 38, pp. 508-520.
Shishkov B.E. (2015) Mekhanizmy gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva v oboronno-promyshlennom komplekse [The mechanisms of public-private partnership in military-industrial complex]. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii, no 12, pp. 88-97.
Vaypan V.A. (2017) Osnovy pravovogo regulirovaniya tsifrovoy ekonomiki [Fundamentals of legal regulation in digital economy]. Pravo i ekonomika, no 11, pp. 5-18.
Voynikaynis E. (2016) Pravo intellektual'noy sobstvennosti v tsifrovuyu epokhu: paradigma balansa i gibkosti [Intellectual property law in the digital age: paradigm of balance and flexibility]. Moscow: Yurisprudentsiya, 552 p. (in Russian)
Copyright (c) 2018 Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












