Enigma of the Constitution of Russian Federation 1993: “Generally Recognized Principles and Norms of International Law”

  • Liudmila P. Anufrieva Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Keywords: generally recognized principles and norms of international law, UN Commission of International Law, genesis, ‘general principles of law recognized by civilized nations, fundamental principles of international law, peremptory norms of ‘general international law, jus cogens, positive law

Abstract

The International law, being the independent legal system, has essential peculiarities, which are not manifested merely by the availability itself of the core component — the relevant system of its principles. The article explores very specific aspect related to the “generally recognized principles and norms of international law” as a category of legal science, in an atypical perspective of finding the origins of its inclusion into the Russian legal system basing on the grounds of analysis of domestic law and effective trends of international practice in this regard. The term and the category itself ‘generally recognized principles and norms of international law' have become an integral part of the Russian contemporary jurisprudence and positive law in a whole due to relevant incorporation thereof into provisions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, 1993. They constitute an important layer in the history of constitutional evolution of our state, which, however, has not yet received due attention in legal literature. Despite the wide-spread use of the afore-referred term in science and positive domestic law both in the Soviet Union and nowadays Russia, the scholars as far as the international law, have not till to date defined the substance and scope of the ‘generally recognized principles and norms' as part of the said system of law nor juxtaposed the same with other categories and notions immune to International Law. Meanwhile, the said term continuously coexists in international law and its research along with other concepts, also covered by the range of designations pertaining to principles — ‘fundamental principles', ‘general principles of law recognized by civilized Nations', jus cogens, etc., which fact, in turn, requires appropriate orientation. The present piece, having relied upon the historiographical approach and theoretical positions substantiated by international legal science, is deemed to attempt to elucidate some queries related to the core issues regarding the subject-matter of the article — the ‘generally recognized principles and norms of international law'- and its constituent elements, as well as its relationship and links with other afore-referred phenomena, i.e. “fundamental principles of international law”, firstly, and the norms of jus cogens (‘peremptory norms of general international law'), secondly. This approach allowed to penetrate into the essence of the analyzed categories. The outcome of the work of the UN International Law Commission (UN IL Commission) related to the topic of ‘jus cogens' is a matter of special attention in the course of analysis.

Author Biography

Liudmila P. Anufrieva, Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Professor, Chair of International Law, Kutafin Moscow State Law University, Doctor of Juridical Sciences. Address: 9 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya Str., Moscow 125993, Russian Federation. E-mail: anufrieva@msal.ru

References

Abashidze A.H. (2017) Principles of International Law: Concept and Terminology Moscovskyi zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no 4, pp. 19-29 (in Russian)

Aleksidze L.A. (1982) Issues of the Theory of International Law. Tbilisi: University Press, 406 p. (in Russian)

Avak'yan S.A. (2000) The Constitution of Russia. Moscow: RYID Press, 528 p. (in Russian)

Berestnev Yu.Yu. (ed.) (2016) Guide to Precedential Practice of the European Court of Human Rights 2002-2016. Moscow: Razvitie pravovykh system, 1288 p. (in Russian)

Bobrov R.L. (1962) Contemporary International Law. Leningrad: University Press, 114 pp. (in Russian)

Bobrov R.L. (1968) Major Issues of the Theory of International Law. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 272 pp. (in Russian)

Chernichenko S.V. (2012) Interplay between Peremptory Norms of International Law and Obligations erga omnes. Moscovskyi zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no 3, pp. 3-16 (in Russian)

Chernichenko S.V. (2014) Outline of International Law. General Issues. Moscow: Nauchnaya kniga, 592 p. (in Russian)

D'Amato A. (1990) It's a bird, it's a plane, it's jus cogens! Connecticut Journal of International Law, no 1, pp. 1-6.

Ispolinov A.S. (2014) Jus cogens in the Judgements of International and Municipal Courts. Rossiyskiy juridicheskiy zhurnal, no 6, pp. 7-14 (in Russian)

Harris D., O'Boyle M., Warbrik C. (2017) Pravo Evropeyskoi konventsii po pravam cheloveka. Moscow: Razvitie pravovykh system, 1342 p. (in Russian)

Kleinlein T. (2016) Jus Cogens as the ‘Highest Law’? Peremptory Norms and Legal Hierarchies. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2015: Jus Cogens — Quo Vadis? (ed.). Amsterdam: Springer, vol. 46, pp. 173-210.

Konovalov A.V. (2018) On the Concept of Principles of Law. Lex Russica, no 8, pp. 81-87 (in Russian)

Korovin E.A. (1951) On the Generally Recognized Norms of the International Law. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, no 9, pp. 14-19 (in Russian)

Marochkin S.Yu. (2019) The Operation of International Law in the Russian Legal System. A Changing Approach. Brill/Nijhoff, Asian Law Series, vol. 8, 308 p.

Minasyan N.M. (1960) The Sources of Contemporary International Law. Rostov: University Press, 152 pp. (in Russian)

Morozov A.N. (2018) Reflection of Generally Recognized Principles of International Law in the Constitution. Journal of Russian Law, no 7, pp. 33-45 (in Russian)

Nefedov B.I. (2019) Principles in the International Law: Terminology. Moscow Journal of International Law, no 1, pp. 6-17 (in Russian)

Neshataeva T.N. (2004) The Court and the Generally Recognized Principles and Norms of International Law. Vestnik Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda, no 3, pp. 124-140 (in Russian)

Pushmin E.A. (1979) Concept of Major Principles of Contemporary International Law. In: Soviet Yearbook of International Law. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 76-84 (in Russian)

Sheyndlin B.V. (1959) Essence of Soviet Law. Leningrad: University Press, 140 p. (in Russian)

Shestakov L.N. (1981) Concerning the problem of identification of the norms jus cogens in the International Law. In: Soviet Yearbook of International Law. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 66-76 (in Russian)

Shaw M. (2008) International Law. 6th ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1708 pp.

Simma B. (ed.). (2002) The Charter of the United Nations. A Commentary. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 895 p.

Talalaev A.N. (1959) Major Principles of the International Law. Soviet Yearbook of International Law. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 513-515 (in Russian)

Tolstik V.A. (2000) Generally Recognized Principles and Norms of International Law within the Legal System of Russia. Journal of Russian Law, no 8, pp. 67-77 (in Russian)

Verdross A. von (1937) Forbidden Treaties in International Law. American Journal of International Law, no 31, pp. 571-574.

Wet de E. (2004) The Prohibition of Torture as an International Norm of Jus Cogens and Its Implications for National and Customary Law. European Journal of International Law, no 1, pp. 97-121.

Published
2019-03-09
How to Cite
AnufrievaL. P. (2019). Enigma of the Constitution of Russian Federation 1993: “Generally Recognized Principles and Norms of International Law”. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (3), 4-25. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2019.3.4.25
Section
Russian Law: Condition, Perspectives, Commentaries