Formation and Development of the Legislation on Ukrainian International Private Law

  • Natalia Yu. Erpyleva National Research University Higher School of Economics
  • Irina V. Getman-Pavlova National Research University Higher School of Economics
Keywords: international private law, codification of law, form and manner of codification, complex autonomous law, Ukraine, civil law conception, case practice

Abstract

The paper analyzes the case of legislation and case practice in Ukraine, in particular the trends in the current process of codifying international private law. The analysis of international private law documents approved for the past 35 years internationally shows that the majour forms (ways) of modern codifications of International Private Law are the following: 1) introbranch form — within the general codification of civil law; 2) interbranch form, the codification o civil law includes a special part with the majour norms and institutes of general and special parts of international private law; 3) autonomous branch form — issuing a special law applying to codifying international private law; 4) complex autonomous form — issuing a law or code combining the principles and conflict of law norms of international Private Law as well as the provisions of international civil process. Ukraine chose a large-scale codification of international private law, i.e. approved a complex autonomous law On International Private Law (enacted as of September 1, 2005), applicable to the choice of law and civil conflicts concerning foreign law and order. This way of codifying international private law is typical of the pluralist concept of private law dominating in Ukraine currently. The law materialized the idea of converging formalist and pragmatic approaches to conflict of law regulation. The case practice for the period of the applicable law since 2005 has shown its relevance and demonstrated interesting examples of its application. Between 2010 and 2013, the law of 2005 experienced significant changes, which in turn may not be considered as a reform of Ukrainian international private law. The paper concludes that currently, the Ukrainian law on international private law requires updating due to the development of European conflict of law regulation and formation of new conflict of law approaches.

Author Biographies

Natalia Yu. Erpyleva, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Head, Department of International Private and Public Law Department, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Professor, Doctor of Juridical Sciences. Address: 20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation. Е-mail: natasha.erpyleva@rambler.ru

Irina V. Getman-Pavlova, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Associate Professor, International Private and Public Law Department, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Candidate of Juridical Sciences. Address: 20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation. E-mail: getmanpav@mail.ru

References

Anufrieva L.P. (2007) Zakon o mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave Ukrainy: vzglyad cherez prizmu sovremennykh tendentsiya v razvitii MChP [Law on International Private Law in Ukraine: Look through the prism of Modern Trends in Developing International Private Law]. Zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava, no 4 (58), pp. 3-10.

Audit B. Droit international privé. Paris: Economica, 2006. 930 p.

Clarkson C.M.V., Hill J. (2006) The Conflict of Laws. Oxford University Press, 672 p.

Boguslavskiy M.M., Lisitsyn-Svetlanov A.G., Trunk A. (eds.) (2013) Sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo v Rossii i Evrosoyuze: v 2 t. Moscow: Norma, SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.

Dariescu C. (2012) New Romanian choice-of-law rules on marriage effects. Analele Stiintifice ale universitatii “Al.I. Cuza”. Tomul LVIII. Stiinnte Juridice. Nr. II, pp. 89-100.

Dovgert A., Merezhko O. (2013) Metodologiya mizhnarodnogo privatnogo prava [Methodology of International Private Law]. Privatne pravo, no 1, pp. 42-50.

Dovgert A.S. (2014) Zakonodavstvo ukraïni z mizhnarodnogo privatnogo prava: dzherela zapozichennya [International Private Law in Ukraine]. Privatne pravo i pidpriemnitstvo. Vip. 13, pp. 13-17.

Dovgert A.S. (2007) Reforma koliziynogo prava v Ukraïni [Conflict of Law Reform in Ukraine]. Problemi pravovogo regulyuvannya komertsiynikh vidnosin v umovakh ïkh internatsionalizatsiî: monografiya / za zag. red. O.D. Krupchana. Ternopil': Vidavnitstvo «Pidruchniki i posibniki», pp. 7-45.

Dovgert A.S. (2010) Udoskonalennya koliziynogo regulyuvannya ta mizhnarodnogo tsivil'nogo protsesu pislya reformi mizhnarodnogo privatnogo prava 2005 roku [Conflict of Laws and Civil Law in Ukraine]. Byuleten’ Ministerstva yustitsiï Ukraïni, no 8, pp. 146-152.

Dovgert A.S., Kisil V.G. (eds.) (2012) Mizhnarodne privatne pravo. Zagal'na chastina: Pidruchnik [International Private Law. Reference book]. Kiïv: Alerta, 375 p.

Merezhko O. (2010) Problemi teoriï mizhnarodnogo publichnogo ta privatnogo prava [Theoretical Problems of International Public Law]. Kiïv: Yustinian, 319 p.

Pilich M. Concise Introduction to Polish Private International Law. Available at: http://pil.mateuszpilich.edh.pl/Introduction_PIL.pdf (accessed: 25 March 2016).

Symeonides S.C. (2014) Codifying Choice of Law Around the World: An International Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, 411 p.

Symeonides S.C. (2001) Material Justice and Conflict Justice in Choice of Law. International Conflict of Laws for the Third Millennium: Essays in Honor of Friedrich K. Juenger / P. Borchers & J. Zekoll (eds.). N.Y.: Transnational Publishers, pp. 125-140.

Zvekov V., Marysheva N. (2006) Zakon Ukrainy 2005 goda «O mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave» [Law of Ukraine 2005]. Khozyaystvo i pravo, no 5, pp. 119-129.

Published
2016-02-24
How to Cite
ErpylevaN. Y., & Getman-PavlovaI. V. (2016). Formation and Development of the Legislation on Ukrainian International Private Law. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (3), 122-138. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2016.3.122.138
Section
Law in the Modern World