Legal Issues of Counteractions to Encouraging Murders and Suicides
Abstract
The article is devoted to researching criminal legal problems of regulation of responsibility for declining and assisting in committing suicides as well as for organizing activities related to the propaganda of murders and suicides. New articles of the Criminal Code need in improvement. Besides, outside the legal framework there remains the organization of activities aimed at encouraging the commission of the murder. The urgency of the issues is due to the fact that, according to statistical information and research, the number of suicides remains at a high level, and qualitative indicators changing towards increasing the number of victims among minors. The number of “motiveless” acts of aggression is growing, including at social infrastructure facilities provoked not without the participation of communities of social networks and channels of messengers of violent subjects. For the purpose of the study, the authors focused on the development of recommendations for improving criminal legislation taking into account the recent changes made to it in the fight against inducement and the promotion of suicide, as well as the great role of social networks and messengers in people's lives. During the research, the methodological basis was the dialectical method of cognition because it allowed evaluating the subject of research in connection with the norms of criminal law and social phenomena. Such scholar methods, as comparative legal, normative dogmatic method and content analysis were applied with the help of which it became possible to analyze social phenomena in the context of their legal regulation. The article analyzes the provisions of criminal law doctrine regarding the problems of countering the external influence on committing suicide and murder. The study of forensic investigation allowed us to identify modern qualitative changes of such influence. In the course of the study, the authors concluded that it is possible to combine articles 110 and 110.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation because they contain significant similarities, and the perpetrator in the course of their execution tends to the same result. The authors also proposed a version of the expanded version of article 110.2 of the Criminal Code, covering the organization of activities aimed at encouraging not only suicide, but also murders.
References
Agafonov A.V. (2012) Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za dovedeniye do samoubiystva [Criminal Responsibility for Bringing to Suicide]. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 208 p. (in Russian)
Agapov P.V., Mikhaylov K.V. (2007) Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za sodeystviye terroisticheskoy deyatel'nosti: tendentsii sovremennoy ugolovnoy politiki: [Criminal Responsibility for the Promotion of Terrorist Activities: Trends in Modern Criminal Policy]. Saratov: Saratovskiy yuridicheskiy institute, 144 p. (in Russian)
Andreissen K. (2006) Do We Need to be Cautious in Evaluating Suicide Statistics? European Journal of Public Health, no. 4, pp. 445-447.
Artiyshina O.V. (2017) Novelly UK RF o protivodeystvii deyatel'nosti, napravlennoy na pobuzhdeniye nesovershennoletnikh k suitsidal'nomu povedeniyu [Novels of the Criminal Code of Russia on counteraction to activity, directed at adolescents to suicidal behavior]. Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii, no 3, pp. 85-92.
Bailey C., Capona A., Mebane D., Snell C. (2002) School Crime Policy Changes: The Impact of Recent Highly Publicized School Crimes. American Journal of Criminal Justice, no 2, pp. 269-285.
Dokuyev A.A. (2015) Sootnosheniye ugolovno-pravovoy normy ob otvetstvennosti za sodeystviye terroristicheskoy deyatel'nosti i norm o souchastii v prestupleniyakh terroristicheskogo kharaktera [Correlation of Criminal Law on The Responsibility for Help to Terrorism and Rules of Complicity in the Terrorist Crimes]. Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii, no 4, pp. 102-113.
Drepelev A.S. (2015) O priznake sushchestvennosti v opredelenii ponyatiya posobnika prestupleniyu [Signpost of Materiality in a Helper to a Crime Definition]. Vestnik Rybinskoy gosudarstvennoy aviatsionnoy tekhnologicheskoy akademii, no 1, pp. 224-229.
Hawdon J., Oksanen A., Rasanen P. (2014) Glamorizing Rampage Online: School Shooting Fan Communities on YouTube. Technology in Society, no 39, pp. 55-67.
Kyppö J., Semenov A., Veijalainen J. (2010) Analyzing Presence of School-Shooting Related Communities at Social Media Sites. International Journal of Multimedia Intelligence and Security, vol. 1, no 3, pp. 232-268.
Nedzel N. (2014) Concealed Carry: The Only Way to Discourage Mass School Shootings. Academic Questions, no 4, pp. 429-435.
Nurkayeva T.N. (2016) O problemakh primeneniya nekotorykh sostavov prestupleniy, svyazannykh s osushchestvleniyem terroristicheskoy deyatel'nosti [Application of Some Offenses relating to Terrorism]. Vestnik VEGU, no 5, pp. 73-80.
Rarog A.I. (2015) Prioritety rossiyskoy ugolovno-pravovoy politiki [Priorities of the Russian Criminal Policy]. Ugolovnoye pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii [Criminal Law Development in the XXI century. Papers of international conference]. Moscow: RG Press, pp. 13-17.
Sablina M.A. (2016) Podstrekatel'stvo: terminologicheskiy i kvalifikatsionniy aspekty [Incitement: Terminology and Qualification Aspects]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, no 4, pp. 129-139.
Sumiala J., Tikka M. (2011) Imagining Globalized Fears: School Shooting Videos and Circulation of Violence On YouTube. Social Anthropology, no 3, pp. 254-267.
Zhadan V.N. (2016) O kvalifikatsii vovlecheniya nesovershennoletnego v soversheniye prestupleniya [Qualification of Engaging a Minor in Committing an Offence]. Monitoring pravoprimeneniya, no 2, pp. 42-48.
Copyright (c) 2018 Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.













