Reforming Budgetary System of Russia and its Features in Complex Subordinate Entities: Forming Legal Base

  • Andrey S. Emelyanov Institute of Public Law
Keywords: budgetary legislation, budget, complex federal subordinate entity, program-oriented approach, budget sphere, conception of budgetary process reformation, budgetary system, budgetary regime

Abstract

In Russia, 1990s have seen a hard process of transfer to market relations and to the modern principles of organizing public power, which affected seriously, but not abolished content of state planning. Even in the most crisis prone period of national development, which has occurred between 1990 and 1993, the process of social and economic planning at the level of the federal government developed fast. More than a hundred state programs were adopted in those years. The contemporary Budgetary Code had focused on reforming the budget system to integrate it. Its main objectives were program-oriented approach, ensuring the goal-oriented approach at its short-, mid- and long-term levels. Organizationally, the reform developed at there stages: 1) federal, 2) regional and 3) local. The specifics of the second one are that in the phenomenon of complex subordinate entity having emerged in the 1990s. These entities had required, in particular, a special approach to organizing and performing budgetary planning. The first decade of the 21st century saw an attempt to find a solution of the issue by the enlargement of some Russian Federation subordinate entities by attaching autonomous regions to krais and oblasts. However, due to a number of causes, it was not made with the Khanty-Mansiysk district / Yugra within Tyomen oblast and the Yamalo Nenets district still within Arkhangelsk oblast. As early as in the 1990s, a unique mechanism of the interaction of the regions in budgetary sphere started its formation. The research of the mechanism is of value as it serves as a guarantor of the Russian economy and budgetary system in 21st century.

Author Biography

Andrey S. Emelyanov, Institute of Public Law

Associate Professor, Leading Research Fellow, Institute of Public Law, Doctor of Juridical Sciences. Address: 131 Moskovskiy Trakt, Tyumen 625049, Russian Federation. E-mail: emelyanoff74@mail.ru

References

Artyukhin R.E. (2012) Voprosy razvitiya byudzhetnogo prava [The development of budgetary law]. Reformy i pravo, no 3, pp. 15-24.

Brezhnev O.V. (2016) Organizatsiya konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya v slozhnosostavnykh sub’ektakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy i perspektivy [Organizing constitutional justice in complex federal subordinate entities]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, no 3, pp. 44-47.

Keilhau W. (1951) Principles of Private and Public Planning. London: Allen Unwin, 331 p.

Komyagin D.L. (2011) Byudzhetnoe pravo Rossii: byudzhetnoe ustroystvo i byudzhetnaya sistema [Russian budgetary law]. Publichno-pravovye issledovaniya, no 3-4, pp. 115135.

Komyagin D.L. (2014) Rossiyskie byudzhetnye reformy: iz proshlogo v budushchee [Russian budgetary reforms: from past to future]. Reformy i pravo, no 1, pp. 57-65.

Komyagin D.L. (2012) Sistema printsipov byudzhetnogo prava: rossiyskoe zakonodatel'stvo i nauchnaya doktrina [Budgetary law principles: Russian legislation and doctrine]. Reformy i pravo, no 4, pp. 19-31.

Kozyrin A.N. (2007) Byudzhetnoe zakonodatel'stvo: nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy st. 2 Byudzhetnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Budgetary legislation: commentary to Russian Budgetary Code Article 2]. Reformy i pravo, no 1, pp. 14-18.

Kozyrin A.N. (ed.) (2002) Postateynyy kommentariy k Byudzhetnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Article-by-article commentary to the Budgetary Code]. Moscow: EKAR, 672 p. (in Russian)

Krokhina Yu. A. (2001) Byudzhetnoe pravo i byudzhetnyy federalizm [Budgetary law and budgetary federalism]. Moscow: Norma, 352 p. (in Russian)

Kuleshov E. (2005) Osobennosti razgranicheniya predmetov vedeniya i polnomochiy v slozhnosostavnykh sub’ektakh Federatsii [Subject matter and administration and powers in complex federal subordinate entities]. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika, no 10, pp. 87-93.

Lorwin L. (1945) Time for Planning. A Social Economic Theory and Program for Twentieth Century. N.Y. and L.: Harper, 281 p.

Matnenko A.S. (2009) Pravovoe regulirovanie programmno-tselevogo metoda byudzhet-noydeyatel'nosti. Diss... doktor jurid. nauk. [Legal regulation of program-oriented method of budgeting. Doctor of juridical sciences thesis]. Omsk, 248 p.

Sokolova E.D. (2012) Sistema printsipov finansovogo prava [Financial law principles]. Finansovoe pravo, no 8, pp. 7-8.

Vershilo T.A. (2013) Printsip rezul'tativnosti i effektivnosti ispol'zovaniya byudzhetnykh sredstv: pravovye problemy realizatsii [Delivery and efficiency in applying budgetary funds: issues of application]. Finansovoe pravo, no 5, pp. 21-28.

Vlasenko N.A. (2013) Krizis prava: problemy i podkhody k resheniyu [Crisis of law: problems and approaches to solution]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no 8, pp. 43-54.

Published
2018-03-06
How to Cite
EmelyanovA. S. (2018). Reforming Budgetary System of Russia and its Features in Complex Subordinate Entities: Forming Legal Base. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (4), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2018.4.93.111
Section
Russian Law: Condition, Perspectives, Commentaries