Legal Regulation of Treatment of Stray Animals in Russia
Abstract
The article analyzes the concept of “stray animals” provided in Russia, both from the point of view of potential competition between the norms of the Civil Code and Federal Law No. 498-FZ and in comparison with the foreign approach. The article offers the author’s vision of the legal “groups” of stray animals and establishes the application limits of the responsible treatment to such animals, which include the non-identical legal status of different groups of stray animals in Russia. Thus, the author distinguishes three categories: (i) stray animals, (ii) animals without owners, and (iii) animals that have been relinquished. The article proves that “stray animal” is general term which includes companion animals and farm animals, while “animals without owners” and “animals that have been relinquished” are only a variety of stray companion animals. The author compared the current regulation of the constituent entities of the Russia in terms of the procedure for identifying animals when catching and the possibility of catching owned animals. Also, it shows the results of author’s research of the entire regional legislation on the criteria of stray animals catching. Moreover, the article highlights the admissibility of euthanasia of stray animals both from the point of view of the current regulation and of humanity, and foreign approaches to euthanasia. The author studied the issues of humanity and effectiveness of the program for controlling the number of stray animals in Russia using the method caught-sterilization-vaccination-release, compared it with other methods used and presented an analysis of the experience of European countries in the implementation of stray animals control programs.
References
Beck A. (1973) The ecology of stray dogs: a study of free-ranging urban animals. Baltimore: York Press, pp. 1-98.
Beck A. (1975) The ecology of “feral” and free-roaming dogs in Baltimore. In: The wild canids, their systematic, behavioral ecology and evolution. M. Fox (ed.). New York.: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 380-390.
Beran G. (1982). Ecology of dogs in the Central Philippines in relation to rabies control efforts. Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases, vol. 5, pp. 265270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-9571(82)90047-9
Broom D. (1998) Welfare, stress and the evolution of feelings. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, vol. 27, pp. 371-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60369-1
Broom D. (2014) Sentience and animal welfare. Wallingford: CABI, pp. 27-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780644035.0000
Carding A. (1969) The significance and dynamics of stray dog populations with special reference to the UK and Japan. Journal of Small Animal Practice, vol. 7, pp. 419-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.1969.tb04052.x
Dühring E. (2000) The value of life. Moscow: AST, 344 p. (in Russ.)
Duncan I. (1981) Animal rights — animal welfare, a scientist's assessment. Poultry Science, vol. 60, pp. 489-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0600489
Fox M., Beck A., Blackman E. (1975) Behavior and ecology of a small group of urban dogs (Canis familiaris). Applied Animal Ethology, vol. 1, pp. 119-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(75)90082-6
Guseva V. (2013) Dog ownership through the eyes of stray dog: property rights and the stray dog population. Available at: https://scholar.colorado.edu/downloads/pk02cb089 (accessed: 24.08.2021)
Gorokhov D.B. (2020) Quality and efficiency of application of the Law on Responsible Treatment of Animals. Zhurnal rossyiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, no. 4, pp. 153171 (in Russ.)
Gorokhov D.B., Gorokhova Yu.V. (2015) Legal regulation of relations on the content, use and protection of animals not related to objects of animal world. Zakonodatelstvo i ekonomika = Legislation and Economics, no. 3, pp. 22-41 (in Russ.)
Khorkov V.N., Alles M.V. (2019) Controversial issues of administrative regulation of animal keeping in the Federal Law On Responsible Treatment of Animals. Administrativnoe pravo iprotcess = Administrative Law and Process, no. 10, pp. 75-79 (in Russ.)
Krasnov Yu.K., Nadvikova V.V., Shkatulla V.I. (2014) Legal technique. Moscow: Yustitsinform, 220 p. (in Russ.)
Mokhov A.A., Kopylov D.E. (2006) Canids as objects of civil rights. Juridicheskyi mir = World of Justice, no. 12, pp. 38-49 (in Russ.)
Okunev K. (2016) Pets as objects of civil rights.
Sadikov O.N. et al. (2006) Civil law. Moscow: Norma, 493 p. (in Russ.)
Tasker L. (2007) Stray animal control practices: Europe. L.: WSPA, pp. 1-54.
Copyright (c) 2022 Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.