Legal regulation of platform employment in BRICS
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to review the state of legal regulation of platform employment in the BRICS member states, assess common problems and work out ways to solve them. To achieve the goal, the method of comparative legal research was chosen as the main one. Study consists of several sections. In the first section the advantages and disadvantages of using platform employment for different participants are considered, as well as possible areas of mutual coordination of interests for the purpose of a legal settlement of the relations mentioned are modeled. The following sections provide a detailed analysis of the state of legal regulation and existing law enforcement practices in each of the BRICS countries. A brief analysis of the legal regulation in the new BRICS states is provided as a separate section. In all the studied states, there has been an increase in the volume of platform employment to one degree or another; there is a similar distribution structure between countries by gender, age, and professional characteristics of those employed on platforms, fields of activity of platforms, salary levels, as well as problems and risks for those employed on the platform. It has been revealed, the measures taken by states in response to the growth of the virtually unregulated sector of the economy and the growing platform employment vary as following. Some countries are taking a wait-and-see attitude regarding the introduction of regulatory changes, others are introducing soft regulation with a minimum of mandatory requirements, while others are developing special regulation of platform employment, introducing special legal statuses for those employed on platforms, while not always maintaining the line of the real features of these categories of employees. In all the countries considered, there are similar potential areas for further legal regulation: the regulatory definition of the categories of platform employment, the consolidation of the list of responsibilities of digital platforms in front of employees (issues of access to social programs and medical packages, transparency of access to the platform and to conditions of work distribution on it, the possibility of working of one person on multiple platforms, collective rights, clear framework regarding the work regime and recreation, safety of working conditions and the place of its implementation).
References
Amorim H., Moda F. (2020) Work by app: algorithmic management and working conditions of Uber drivers in Brazil. Work Organization, Labor & Globalization, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 101-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.14.1.0101
Cano M., Espelt R., Morell M. (2021) Flexibility and freedom for whom? Precarity, freedom and flexibility in on-demand food delivery. Work Organization, Labor & Globalization, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 46-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.15.1.0046
Chernykh N.V. (2023) Transformation of labor as an object of public relations and the spread of atypical forms of employment. Aktual’nye problémy rossijskogo prava=Current Issues of the Russian Law, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 104-113 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.157.12.104-113
Davidov G. (2023) Platform workers, autonomy, and capability approach. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/979-12-215-0507-8.20
Dhanya M.B. (2024) BRICS and the gig economy: a focus on India's platform employment. Social and Labor Research, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 21-30.
Elsayed M. (2021) The United Arab Emirates' labor market: an overview. LSE Middle East Centre Paper Series.
Fagioli A. (2021) To exploit and dispossess: twofold logic of platform capitalism. Work Organization, Labor & Globalization, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 126-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.15.1.0126
Grebenshchikov A.V., Diveeva N.I., Kuzmenko A.V. (2020). Labor relations with an online aggregator: tomorrow's reality? Ezhegodnik trudovogo prava=Annual Review of Labor Law, issue 10, pp. 53-66 (in Russ.)
Hassan R. (2023) Work arrangements in the informal sector and gig economy. Digital platform economy in Egypt.
Hassani H. (2021) Online platforms and sharing economy: promises and challenges for gig workers. Global Media Journal-Persian Edition, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 53-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ktbdrm.7
Heeks R., Graham M. et al. (2021) Systematic evaluation of gig work against decent work standards: The development and application of the Fairwork framework. The Information Society, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 267-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2021.1942356
Korshunova T.Yu., Motsnaya O.V. (2022) The influence of platform employment on changing perceptions of employee and employer. Ezhegodnik trudovogo prava=Annual Review of Labor Law, issue 12, pp. 76-91 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu32.2022.107
Lushnikov A.M., Lushnikova M.V. (2022) Labor law and the digital economy: Russian experience in the context of global trends. Ezhegodnik trudovogo prava =Annual Review of Labor Law, issue 12, pp. 19-29 (in Russ.)
Menegatty E. (2022) Moving past the uncertain classification of platform workers. Ezhegodnik trudovogo prava=Annual Labor Law Review, issue 12, pp. 167-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu32.2022.112
Mokofe W. (2022) Achieving decent work for digital platform workers in South Africa. Obiter, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 161-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v43i2.14278
Motina E.V., Tomashevsky K.L., Chichina E.V. (2024) Legal regulation of atypical forms of employment in context of digitalization and regional integration. Minsk: Amalfeya, 244 p. (in Russ.)
Mpofu T., Tsibolane P. et al. (2021) Risks and risk-mitigation strategies of gig economy workers in the global South: the case of ride-hailing in Cape Town. In: J.M. Bass, P.J. Wall (eds.) Information and Communication Technologies for Development. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 58, pp. 26-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65828-1_3
Nurgalieva E.N., Baymakhanova A.S. (2024) Aspects of platform employment legal regulation in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Vestnik Evrazijskogo nacional’nogo universiteta L.N. Gumileva. Pravo=Bulletin of Euroasian National Gumilev University. Law, no. 1, pp. 49-65 (in Russ.)
Rolf S., Schindler S. (2023) The US-China rivalry and the emergence of state platform capitalism. Environment and Planning A, vol. 55, no 1, pp. 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221146545
Sinyavskaya O.V., Biryukova S.S. et al. (2022) Platform employment in Russia: scales, motives and barriers to participation. Moscow: HSE, 31 p. (in Russ.)
Sinyavskaya O.V., Biryukova S.S. et al. (2021) Platform employment: definition and regulation. Moscow: HSE, 71 p. (in Russ.)
Shuraleva S.V. (2023) Impact of digital technologies on legal regulation of labor and employment of vulnerable groups of workers. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki=Bulletin of Perm University, no. 65, pp. 645-661 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2023-62-645-661
Surie A. (2020) On-demand platforms and pricing: how platforms can impact the informal urban economy, evidence from Bengaluru, India. Work Organization, Labor & Globalization, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 88-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.14.1.0083
Tianyu W., Fang L. (2021) Internet platform employment in China: legal challenges and implications for gig workers through the lens of court decisions. Industrial Relations, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 541-564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1083612ar
Trenton E., Stevie S. (2024) Location-based platform work in South Africa. Mapping prospects for organizing: a report for Solidarity Center Labor Research Service.
Xiaohui B., Beck T. et al. (2023) Platform economy in China and Germany.
Zhou I. (2020) Digital labor platforms and labor protection in China.
Copyright (c) 2025 Novikov D.A., Nogaylieva F. K.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
