Regulating the Sector of Public Procurement in Regional Trade Associations in the EU

  • Tatyana Kachurina Department of International Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics
Keywords: EU procurement law, procurement principles, international procurement, regional trade union, EU Directive, transparency principle, non-discrimination principle, in house doctrine, procurement method, tendering procedure, contract award, objective scope, subjective scope, procurement supplier, public procurement law, international procurement law

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of the international public procurement sector regulation in the regional trade unions in the European Union. The article examines the key regional legal documents of the European Union such as EU Directives and analyzes the problems of their legal application at the national level. The directives form the basis for the regulation mechanism of the public procurement and coordinate procedures for public bidding for both private and state-owned enterprises. The directives encourage free competition in the bidding process and stimulate cross-border trading. The paper describes various ways of applying the basic principles of the public procurement law (in particular, it deals with the aspect of the transparency principle as a mechanism to control public contracts’ award). The principle of transparency is considered in the paper as a “monitoring tool” for public procurement contracts. Transparency principle is described in international judicial practice, where the goal of applying the transparency principle is seen as a guarantee of compliance with other fundamental legal principles (e.g. the principle of fair competition and the principle of non-discrimination). It describes EU Directives’ subjective and objective application scope and the procedures of public procurement contracts’ award. The article points out the main terms and conditions of the tender procedures and outlines issues of possible violations of the EU and national law by the public authorities involved in procurement practice. The article provides a detailed overview of the tendering procedures’ types, the process of suppliers’ qualifications and defines procurement financial thresholds. Directives prescribe four different public procurement procedures (open, closed, competitive dialogue procedure and negotiation). Presenting of the essential internal company or financial documentation is compulsory step in the process of suppliers’ qualification. The article also discusses the importance of the most advantageous economic proposals in the procedure of the contract award. The author refers to the topic of advertising as a method of important information disclosure during the tendering process and discusses potential «pitfalls» in the field of information security breach. The article analyses EU judicial practice and raises the issue of application of the «in house» doctrine.

Author Biography

Tatyana Kachurina, Department of International Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Postgraduate student

References

De Gucht, Barniel Μ. On the Markets of Europe and striving free market http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/kazakhstan/documents/eu_kazakhstan/public_procurement_ru.pdf

Khramkin A. Mezhdunarodniy opyt postroeniya systemy goszakupok [International experience of procurement]. Available at Budget.ru http://www.bujet.ru/airMH/46008.php (accessed 12 November 2013). European Public Law (2010), vol.16, May 2010, no 2.

Třepte P. (2007) Public Procurement in the EU: A practitioners Guide. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Directive 2004/17/ec, directive 2004/17/ec of the European Parliament and of the Council, 31 March 2004, «Coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors», Eur-lex, Europa. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do2uri=OJ:L:2004:134:0001:0113:en:PDF (accessed 12 November 2013).

Directive 2004/18/ec, directive 2004/18/ec of the European Parlament and of the Council, 31 March 2004, «On the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts», Eur-lex, Europa. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriSen//LexUriServ.do2uri=OJ:L:2004:134:0114:0240:EN:PDF (accessed 12 November 2013).

Treaty on European Union–Maastricht Treaty, in force from 1st of November 1993, Eur-lex, Europa. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/11992M/htm/11992M.html (accessed 12 November 2013).

Regulation 2151/2003-O.J. 2003, L.329/1, COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2151/2003 of 16 December 2003, «Amending Regulation (EC) No 2195/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV)», Eur-lex, Europa, Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do2uri=OJ:L:2003:329:0001:0270:EN:PDF (accessed 12 November 2013).

Regulation 1422/2007, O.J. 2007; L.317/34, COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1422/2007 of 4 December 2007, «Amending Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council in respect of their application thresholds for the procedures for the award of contracts», Eur-lex, Europa. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do2uri=OJ:L:2007:317:0034:0035:EN:PDF (accessed 12 November 2013).

C-373/00 Adolf Truly GmbH v Bestattung Wien GmbH (‘Truly’) [2003] ECR 1-1931.

C-223/99 and C-260/99 Agora Sri and Excelsior Snc di Pedrotti Bruna & C. v Ente Autonomo Fiera Internazionale di Milano and Ciftar Soc. coop, ari (Agora’) [2001] ECR 3605.

Case C-434/02 Arnold Andre GmbH & Co KG v Landrat des Kreises Herford (Arnold’) [2004] ECR 1-11825.

C-59/00 Bent Mousten Vestergaard v Spottrup Boligselskab [2001] ECR I-9505.

C-87/94 Commission v Belgium (‘Walloon Buses’) [1996] ECR I-2043.

C-234/89 Commission v Denmark [1993] ECR I-3353.

Case 307/87 Commission v Greece [1989] ECR 1461.

C-507/03 Commission v Ireland (OJ 2004 C35/4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1469-7688/4/3/M01

C-45/87 Commission of the European Communities v Ireland (‘Dundalk’) [1987] ECR 4929.

C-353/93 Commission of the European Communities v Ireland (‘Coillte Teoranta’) [1998] ECR 8565.

C-323/96 Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (‘Vlaamse Raad’) [1998] ECR I-5063.

C-513/99 Concordia bus Finland v Helsinki Municipality [2002] ECR 1-7213.

C-360/97 Connemara Machine Turf Co Ltd v Coillte Teoranta (‘Connemara’) [1998] ECR 1-8761.

C-231/03 Consorzio Aziende Metano (‘Coname’) v Padania Acque SpA (‘Coname’) [2005] ECR I-7287 C-27-29/86 Constructions et Enterprises Industrielles (CEI) & Bellini v Association Intercommunalepur les Autoroutes des Ardennes (Ardennes’) [1987] ECR 334^7.

C-448/01 EVN AG and Wienstrom GmbH v Republic of Austria [2003] ECR 1-14527.

C-4-0/0-Frisch, Chiari & Partner [2003].

C-31/87 Gebroeders Beentjes BV v State of the Netherlands (‘Beentjes’) [1998] ECR 4635.

C-360/96 Gemeentden Arnhem and Gemeente Rheden v BFI Holding BV (Arnhem’) [1998] ECR 16821. Case 186/87 Ian William Cowan vTresor Public [1989] ECR 195.

C-285 i C-286/99 Impresa Lombardini SpA — Impresa Generale di Costruzioni v ANAS — Entenazionale per le strade and Societa ltaliana per Condotteď Acqua SpA (‘Impresa Lombardini’) (C-285/99), Impresa ing. Mantovani SpA v ANAS — Entenazionale per le strade and Ditta Paolo Bregoli (C-286/99) [2001] ECR I-9233.

Case C-304/01 Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities [2004] ECR I-7655.

Published
2013-02-12
How to Cite
KachurinaT. (2013). Regulating the Sector of Public Procurement in Regional Trade Associations in the EU. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (4), 107-127. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2013.4.107.127
Section
Law in the Modern World