Problematic Result of Domestic Lawmaking: Legislative Establishing Protection of Life or Health of Animals and Plants

  • Dmitry B. Gorokhov Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Keywords: lawmaking, legal regime of animals and plants, humane treatment of animals, legal protection of “life or health of animals and plants”, responsibility for causing harm to “life or health of animals and plants”, legal personality of animals and plants, implementation of international legal norms

Abstract

The article presents the result of a comprehensive study of a new legal category — «life or health of animals and plants», which is present in several existing and projected federal laws. The purpose of the study, conducted using formal legal and systemic methods, as well as the method of modeling, is to find out what is the correlation of this category with the legislation and the legal system as a whole. It is proved that the investigated norms contradict the constitutional provisions and the legislation of Russia, moreover, the fundamental principles of law relating animals and plants not to the subjects, but to the objects of legal relations. The design of the criticized rules is such that not only people, but also animals and plants should be recognized as victims of an administrative offense and creditors for compensation for harm to life and health. The analysis of judicial practice shows that these norms will not be useful in the protection of animals from abuse, and objects of fauna, plants, forests and forest resources — from the destruction, illegal use and harmful effects of human economic activity, because these norms are not applicable in practice. The reason for the penetration of norms on protection of «life or health of animals and plants» into the current Russian legislation is found — it is result of bad implementation of the wording of some international treaties with the participation of Russia without taking into account the peculiarities of the Russian legal system. The analysis of publications on the topic indicates attempts of scientific substantiation of the dubious legitimization, which confirms the author's hypothesis about the possible threat of deformation of the Russian legal doctrine. Errors that caused the criticized state of certain norms of federal laws are named and classified. Author justified the necessity of harmonization of terminology and criticized the content of individual norms with the provisions of the Constitution of Russia and federal laws in the areas of health protection, environmental protection and natural resources, the protection of property rights of physical and legal entities. In this regard the recommendation by the planning and coherence of the work proposed at the stage of law-making, the use of legal technology are given.

Author Biography

Dmitry B. Gorokhov, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

Leading Researcher, Department of Environmental and Agricultural Legislation, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Candidate of Juridical Sciences. Address: 34 Bolshaya Cheremushkinskaya Str., Moscow 117218, Russian Federation. Е-mail: julia7709@yandex.ru

References

Ageshkina N.A., Korzhov Y.V. (2016) Commentary to the Federal Law of 27.12. 2002 № 184-FZ “On Technical Regulation”. SPS Consultant Plus (in Russian)

Anisimov A.P. (2016) Classification of Animal Rights. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo, no 1, pp. 183-188 (in Russian).

Belyakova A.M. (1986) Civil Liability for Causing Damage. Theory and Practice. Moscow: MGU Press, 149 p. (in Russian)

Bogolyubov S.A. (2010) Law-making in the Environmental Sphere. Moscow: Eksmo, 528 p. (in Russian)

Chetverikov A.O. (2013) National Security of Russia and the Law of the World Trade Organization. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, no 8, pp. 75-82 (in Russian)

Duyunov V.K. (ed.) Criminal Law of Russia. Moscow: RIOR, 664 p. (in Russian)

Evseev E.F. (2009) On the Correlation of the Definitions “Animal” and “Item” in Civil Law. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika, no 2, pp. 23-26 (in Russian)

Gadzhiev G.A., Voynikanis E.A. (2018) May a Robot be a Subject of Law? (Search for the Regulating Digital Economy). Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, no 4, pp. 24-48 (in Russian)

Gasnikov K.D. (2002) Animals as Object of Civil Rights. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika, no 12, pp. 41-43 (in Russian)

Kashirkina A.A., Morozov A.N. (2014) Russia, the Eurasian Economic Union and the World Trade Organization. Moscow: INFRA-M, 295 p. (in Russian)

Khabrieva T.Ya., Chernogor N.N. (2018) Law in Digital Reality. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no 1, pp. 85-102 (in Russian)

Khabrieva T.Ya., Tikhomirov Yu. A. (eds.) (2015) Concept of Development of Legislation. Moscow: Norma, 544 p. (in Russian)

Khabrieva T.Ya. et al. (2017) Court Practice in Modern Russian Legal System. Moscow: Norma, 432 p. (in Russian)

Khludeneva N.I. (2014) The Defects of Regulating Environmental Protection. Moscow: INFRA-M, 172 p. (in Russian)

Kichigin N.V. (ed.) (2017) Legal Regulation of Recovering Environmental Damage. Moscow: INFRA, 368 p. (in Russian)

Kvanina V.V. (2014) State Control and Legal Responsibility in the Sphere of Technical Regulation. Biznes, Management i pravo. no 1, pp. 35-41 (in Russian)

Laskina N.V. (2013) Comment to the Federal Law of 30.12. 2009 № 384-FZ “Technical Regulating Safety of Buildings and Structures”. SPS Consultant Plus (in Russian)

Lazarev V.V. (ed.) (2003) General Theory of Law and State. Moscow: Yurist, 520 p. (in Russian)

Mikryukov V.A. (2014) Benefits and Burdens of Owning an Animal. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika, no 8. pp. 48-55 (n Russian)

Minina E.L. (2014) Legal Regulating Animal Treatment. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no 12, pp. 80-88 (in Russian)

Mokhov A.A., Kopylov D.E. (2006) Canines as Objects of Civil Rights. Yuridicheskiy mir, no 12, pp. 41-45 (in Russian)

Naumov A.V. (1996) Russian Criminal Law. Moscow: BEK, 560 p. (in Russian)

Nikolyukin S.V., Utkina I.O. (2008) Features of Emergence and the Termination of the Property Right to Neglected and Ownerless Animals: Collisions of Civil Law. Yurist, no 6, pp. 19-27 (in Russian)

Putilo N.V. (ed.) (2017) The Rght of Citizens for Provision of Medicines. Moscow: Norma, 216 p. (in Russian)

Sadikov O.N. (2006) (ed.) Civil Law. Moscow: INFRA. 493 p. (in Russian)

Schupletsova Yu.P. (ed.) (2016) Legal Regulation of Forest Use and Protection under Russian and Foreign Law. Moscow: INFRA-M, 272 p. (in Russian)

Sukhanov E.A. (ed.) (2000) Civil Law. Moscow: BEK, 518 p. (in Russian)

Shakirova D.I. (2018) Legal and Technical Regulating Environmental Protection: Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Moscow, 185 p. (in Russian)

Valeev M.M. (2003) Things as Objects of Civil Relations. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Ekaterinburg, 215 p. (in Russian)

Vaskovsky E.V. (2003) Textbook of Civil Law. Moscow: Statut, 382 p. (in Russian)

Yakovlev V.E. et al. (2017) Legal Capacity: Historical, Sectorial and International Legal Analysis. Moscow: Statut, 434 p. (in Russian)

Zenin I. A. (2007) Civil Law. Moscow: Vyshaya shkola, 567 p. (in Russian)

Zorkin V.D. (ed.) (2014) Modern Constitutionalism. 'Proceedings of Conference to the 20th anniversary of the Constitution of Russia. Moscow: Norma, 480 p. (in Russian)

Published
2019-03-08
How to Cite
GorokhovD. B. (2019). Problematic Result of Domestic Lawmaking: Legislative Establishing Protection of Life or Health of Animals and Plants. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (2), 45-78. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2019.2.45.78
Section
Legal Thought: History and Modernity