Evolution and Cessation of the Existence of Customary Rules of International Law
Abstract
The doctrine of international law pays a lot of attention to the formation norm of customary international law. At the same time, it is quite rare to find studies on their evolution and the end of existence. In this article, therefore, based on a dialectical approach, the use of scientific research methods, and such private-scientific methods as a comparative legal method, as well as methods of legal modelling and legal forecasting, the results of the study of the evolution norm of customary international law, as well as their extinction, are presented. In the case of the established norms of customary international law, their evolution provides for a stage of their qualitative change, development and is conditioned, first of all, by the needs of the development of inter-State relations. Evolution is accompanied by clarification of the elements of such norms. At the same time, the emergence of a new norm is not possible without violations of existing ones, and offenders, deviating from the established norms, with international legal responsibility, at the same time must explain to other States the reasons for such behavior. This practice is mainly related to the dispositive norms of international law. In order for a new norm of customary international law to be formed, it is necessary that the deviation from the previous norm be massive, initially local and, in the future, universal. The criteria for the formation norm of customary international law are applicable to assess the changes that are taking place. The main factors that may influence the evolution norm of customary international law include the emergence of a non-existent rule of amended new rule in the laws of states, the international treaty, and the new international soft law. Codification and the progressive development of international law contributed to the evolution norm of customary international law. It is important to note that, in the absence of the needs of social development, as well as appropriate practice, the norm of customary international law dies. In this case it is possible to create fundamentally new norms of customary international law, and in the future their evolution.
References
Alekseev S.S. (1995) Theory of Law. Moscow: BEK, 320 p. (in Russian)
Chernichenko S.V. (2014) Contours of International Law. Moscow: Nauchnaya Kniga, 592 p. (in Russian)
Chernichenko S.V. (1999) Theory of International Law. Vol. 2. Moscow: NIMP, 531 p. (in Russian)
D'Amato A. (1987) The President and International Law: A Missing Dimension. American Journal of International Law, no 2, pp. 375-377.
Danilenko G.M. (1988) Custom in Contemporary International Law. Moscow: Nauka, 192 p. (in Russian)
Frolov I.T. (ed.) (1986) Philosophical Dictionary. Moscow: Politizdat, 590 p. (in Russian)
Henkerts J.-M., et al. (2006) Customary international humanitarian law. Vol. 1. Moscow.: International Committee of the Red Cross, 818 p. (in Russian)
Il'inskaja O.I. (2012) Issues of applying customary international law. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava, no 11, pp. 114-125 (in Russian)
Kartashkin V.A. (2015) Changing the Normative Content of the Principles of Modern International Law. Moscow Journal of International Law, no 1, pp. 29-39 (in Russian)
Kelsen H. (1967) Principles of International Law. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 461 p.
Klimenko B.M., Petrovsky V.F., Rybakov I.M. (ed.) (1982) Dictionary of International Law. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, 248 p. (in Russian)
Kojevnikov F.I. (ed.) (1957) International Law. Moscow: Gosyurizdat, 472 p. (in Russian)
Kolombos D. (1975) International Law of the Sea. Moscow: Progress, 447 p.
Kuznetcov V.I. (ed.) (2010) International Law. Moscow: Norma, 720 p. (in Russian)
Lukashuk I.I. (1996) International Law. Common Part. Moscow: BEK, 371 p. (in Russian)
Lukashuk I.I. (1997) Norms of International Law in International Normative System. Moscow: Spark, 223 p. (in Russian)
Movchan A.P. (1972) Codification and development of international law. Moscow: Yuridichekaya literatura, 216 p. (in Russian)
Punjin S.M. (ed.) (2014) Principles of demarcation of marine spaces. International Law of the Sea. Moscow: Statut, pp. 61-93 (in Russian)
Shammasova L.R. (2006) International Custom in Contemporary International Law. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Moscow, 214 p. (in Russian)
Tunkin G.I. (2000) Theory of International Law. Moscow: Zertsalo, 111 p. (in Russian)
Vasyakina E.V. (2014) Evolution of International Criminal Tribunals (1945-1994). Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Moscow, 193 p. (in Russian)
Vilegjanin A.N., Kalamkaryan R.A. (2012) International custom as the main source of international law. Gosudarstvo i pravo, no 6, pp. 78-89 (in Russian)
Villiger M. (1997) Customary International Law and Treaties: A Manual on the Theory and Practice of the Interrelation of Sources. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 378 p.
Vincy F., Parisi F. (2009) Stability and Change In International Customary Law. Supreme Court Economic Review, no 1, pp. 279-309.
Vittstum W. et al. (2011) International Law. Moscow: Infotropik Media, 962 p. (in Russian)
Copyright (c) 2019 Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












