https://law-journal.hse.ru/index.php/psychology/issue/feed 2019-03-19T04:07:18+03:00 Байрамян Роксана Мамиконовна psychology.hse@gmail.com Open Journal Systems <p>«Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics» was established by the National Research University — Higher School of Economics (HSE) in 2004 and is administered by&nbsp;the School of Psychology of HSE.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p class="text">Address:<br>Armyanskii ln., 4-2, Moscow, 101000, Russia</p> <p class="text">Е-mail:<br>psychology.hse@gmail.com</p> https://law-journal.hse.ru/index.php/psychology/article/view/1330 2019-03-19T04:04:08+03:00 Ирина Евгеньевна Сироткина isiro@mail.ru 2011-03-16T00:00:00+03:00 Copyright (c) https://law-journal.hse.ru/index.php/psychology/article/view/1331 2019-03-19T04:04:03+03:00 Р. Смит rsmith@mail.ru 2011-03-16T00:00:00+03:00 Copyright (c) https://law-journal.hse.ru/index.php/psychology/article/view/1321 2019-03-19T04:01:05+03:00 2011-03-17T00:00:00+03:00 Copyright (c) https://law-journal.hse.ru/index.php/psychology/article/view/1323 2019-03-19T04:04:52+03:00 Елена Алексеевна Сергиенко e.sergienko@psychol.rus.ru

On the basis of her own studies in the area of early ontogenesis, as well as of work by other researchers, the author argues that the single system of perception and action can be divided into two subsystems, that of perceptual control and that of identification or recognition. They differ in several regards: in ways of interacting with the world (allocentric vs. egocentric), in types of codifying and storing information (modality unspecific coding vs. modality specific coding), in degrees of awareness (higher degree of awareness is characteristic of the subsystem of identification), and in effects of anticipation (anticipation in time and space vs. selective anticipation). Both subsystems appear and develop from birth onward, but the subsystem of perceptual control reaches the stage of mature organisation earlier that the one that deals with identification. Although they have different features, both subsystems are controlled by hierarchically organised representations. Either of them may become dominant in response to a certain task.

2011-03-16T00:00:00+03:00 Copyright (c) https://law-journal.hse.ru/index.php/psychology/article/view/1322 2019-03-19T04:07:18+03:00 Евгений Николаевич Соколов ensok@mail.ru

According to the hypothesis advanced by the author, consciousness emerges in specific neurons (the so-called neurons of consciousness) that together form hierarchic pyramids. The paper suggests an intercellular mechanism for consciousness based on quantum processes in microtubules of the cell skeletons of these neurons.

2011-03-15T00:00:00+03:00 Copyright (c) https://law-journal.hse.ru/index.php/psychology/article/view/1332 2019-03-19T04:03:59+03:00 Катерина Николаевна Поливанова kpolivanova@hse.ru 2011-03-16T00:00:00+03:00 Copyright (c) https://law-journal.hse.ru/index.php/psychology/article/view/1329 2019-03-19T04:04:14+03:00 Виктор Михайлович Аллахвердов vimiall@gmail.com 2011-03-16T00:00:00+03:00 Copyright (c) https://law-journal.hse.ru/index.php/psychology/article/view/1324 2019-03-19T04:04:46+03:00 Татьяна Николаевна Ушакова t.ushakova@mtunet.ru 2011-03-16T00:00:00+03:00 Copyright (c) https://law-journal.hse.ru/index.php/psychology/article/view/1325 2019-03-19T04:04:40+03:00 Александр Георгиевич Шмелев ags04@ht.ru

The discussion around tests has its deeper roots in the crisis of science and methodology in Russia, in the immaturity of the professional community, and in the failure of state employment policy. The article uses the metaphor of a test as a weapon. Like weapons, tests give an advantage to their owner and, like weapons, they may cause harm. This metaphor throws new light on such features of tests as their reliability, validity, and trustworthiness. The confusion about tests, when it arises, is mostly caused by their incompetent use.

2011-03-16T00:00:00+03:00 Copyright (c) https://law-journal.hse.ru/index.php/psychology/article/view/1326 2019-03-19T04:04:34+03:00 Диана Борисовна Богоявленская ijkarus@voxnet.ru

The author provides her own interpretation of what intelligence and creativity tests reveal. The author shows that creativity tests, based on the notion of creativity as divergent thinking, cannot be valid. This notion of creativity contrasts with another notion which originates in philosophy and the human sciences and which is shared by the Russian psychological tradition. The author refers to her own conception of creativity, in which she uses a notion of the unit of analysis. Finally, the author offers a new method of psychological diagnostics, the validity of which has been proved by both theoretical and experimental research.

2011-03-16T00:00:00+03:00 Copyright (c) https://law-journal.hse.ru/index.php/psychology/article/view/1327 2019-03-19T04:04:28+03:00 Марина Александровна Холодная kholod@psychol.ras.ru

The article deals with the problems of psychological diagnostics of a person&rsquo;s intellectual abilities. The author argues that, when interpreting the results of intelligence testing of a particular individual (whether child or adult), it is neither possible to diagnose correctly the person&rsquo;s real intellectual resources nor predict the direction in which this potential will develop. The article discusses professional and ethical principles of applying intelligence tests as well as the social and ideological aspects of testing. Arguing from a stated developmental paradigm, the author attempts to draw limits within which psychometric intelligence tests can be used, and she also addresses the issue of protecting the rights of a personality.

2011-03-16T00:00:00+03:00 Copyright (c) https://law-journal.hse.ru/index.php/psychology/article/view/1328 2019-03-19T04:04:21+03:00 Дмитрий Викторович Ушаков dv.ushakov@gmail.com

The article presents data in support of the high prognostic validity of intelligence tests and of their capacity to predict achievement in learning, professional work, and social status. The structural-and-dynamic theory of intelligence developed by the author both offers an explanation of the prognostic power of intelligence tests and draws the line beyond which it may vanish. The author argues that intelligence tests are more than mere measuring tools: using them, psychologists affect their subject. He suggests ways along which the praxiology of testing, that is, a science of the practical use of tests, could develop.

2011-03-16T00:00:00+03:00 Copyright (c)