Скрыть
Раскрыть

Контактная информация

Адрес редакции

109028 Москва, Большой Трёхсвятительский пер., 3, офис 113

Тел.: (985) 220-99-87

e-mail: lawjournal@hse.ru

Адрес издателя и распространителя

Фактический: 115230, Москва, Варшавское шоссе, 44а, офис 201, Издательский дом ВШЭ.

Почтовый: 101990, Москва, ул. Мясницкая, 20

Тел./факс: (495) 772-95-71 e-mail: id.hse@mail.ru


Шитов А. Н.

The Communicative Theory of Punishment and Repentance

2018. № 4. С. 162–180 [содержание номера]
The paper argues that the repentance of an offender can make his punishment inappropriate and that courts must consider repentance as a sufficient reason not to inflict punishment at all or to reduce it. The discussion begins with an examination of the communicative theory of punishment which acknowledges that punishment must aim at the repentance of offenders. However, this theory, as brilliantly presented in the works of Antony Duff, does not admit generally that repentance is a sufficient reason to remit punishment. Another representative of the communicative theory, John Tasioulas, argues that repentance must be considered as a ground for mercy. Both writers, however, perceive repentance outside the normative framework of criminal justice process. The author argues that repentance can and must be an essential element in inflicting or remitting punishment. The reasons to support such a conclusion are drawn from a variety of writings ranging from traditional criminology to the theological writings of Augustine, Aquinas, and Calvin.
Библиографическое описание: Chitov A. (2018) The Communicative Theory of Punishment and Repentance. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, no 4, pp. 162–180 (in English)
BiBTeX
RIS
 
 
Rambler's Top100 rss